Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/310,111

ELECTRONIC DEVICE METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CHARGING CURRENT FOR MULTIPLE BATTERIES BASED ON SENSING RESISTORS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 01, 2023
Examiner
KOUSAR, SADIA
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
69 granted / 109 resolved
-4.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
155
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
§102
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 109 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over McCoy et al. (US 2012/0182021), herein after McCoy and Kim et al. (US 2020/0036198), herein after Kim. Regarding claim 1, McCoy discloses An electronic device (fig. 3), comprising: a first battery (302, fig. 3); a second battery (301, fig. 3); a first sensing integrated circuit (IC) (303A, fig. 3) configured to identify a measurement value of a total charging current for the first battery and the second battery through a first sensing resistor electrically connected to the first battery and the second battery (Current measuring device 303A gives I.sub.total, paragraph [0033]); and a second sensing IC configured to identify a second charging current value for the second battery through a second sensing resistor electrically connected to the second battery (current measuring device 303B gives I.sub.1, paragraph [0033]), McCoy further discloses monitor the total charging current for both the batteries (A third approach includes a current measuring device to measure I.sub.1 (or I.sub.2), with the value of I.sub.total being acquired from other sources, such as a battery management unit, paragraph [0032]) wherein the first charging current value is identified based on the measurement value of the total charging current and the second charging current value (calculating of I.sub.2 (or I.sub.1) from the measured values, paragraph [0032] and Current measuring device 303A gives I.sub.total, and current measuring device 303B gives I.sub.1; I.sub.2 is equal to the difference between I.sub.total and I.sub.1, allowing calculation of the differential current between batteries 301 and 302, paragraph [0033];the differential current technique is used to find the first charging current value). However, McCoy does not explicitly disclose at least one processor; wherein the at least one processor is configured to: set the total charging current for charging the first battery and the second battery to a first value, set the total charging current to a second value less than the first value, based on identifying a first charging current value greater than a first reference value or the second charging current value greater than a second reference value. Kim discloses and electronic device and manage power between the batteries. Kim discloses at least one processor (470 with the integrated circuit 440, fig. 4); wherein the at least one processor is configured to: set the total charging current for charging the first battery and the second battery to a first value (the power management integrated circuit 440 may output charging related information during the charging of the first and second batteries 410 and 420. The charging related information may include, for example, at least one of the total charge current, paragraph [0042]shows that the processor set the total charging current for the batteries), set the total charging current to a second value less than the first value, based on identifying a first charging current value greater than a first reference value or the second charging current value greater than a second reference value When the total voltage is higher than the third reference voltage, the power management integrated circuit 440 may, based on the voltages of the first and second batteries 410 and 420, control the charging current to be reduced in a stepwise manner, paragraph [0079]). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 2, McCoy in view of Kim disclose the electronic device of claim 1. Kim further discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to set the total charging current to a third value greater than the first value, based on the first charging current value being less than a third reference value or the second charging current value being less than a fourth reference value (When the total voltage is higher than the third reference voltage, the power management integrated circuit 440 may, based on the voltages of the first and second batteries 410 and 420, control the charging current to be reduced in a stepwise manner, paragraph [0079]). And the same process work in opposite side. If the total voltage is less than the reference voltage the applied current increases). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 3, McCoy in view of Kim disclose the electronic device of claim 1. Kim further discloses wherein the first sensing IC includes an interface power management integrated circuit (IF PMIC) configured to charge the first battery and the second battery (The power management integrated circuit governs charging of the batteries based on an overall state of the batteries, paragraph [0009]), and wherein the second sensing IC includes a direct current integrated circuit (DC IC) (board 430 which provide direct power to the batteries, fig. 4). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 4, McCoy in view of Kim disclose the electronic device of claim 1. Kim further discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to display on a display a notification indicating an abnormal state of a power path for the first battery or a power path for the second battery based on the second value, and wherein a difference between the second value and the first value is greater than a threshold value (paragraph [0100]). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a display to notify the abnormality of the battery on the screen as taught by Kim, in order to . This prevents damage, improves safety, and extends battery life. Regarding claim 5, McCoy further discloses the first sensing circuit (303A, fig. 3) measure the first charging current (paragraph [0032]-[0033]). However, McCoy is silent about wherein the at least one processor is further configured to obtain a signal notifying that the charging current value is greater than the first reference value. Kim discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to obtain, from the first sensing IC, a signal notifying that the first charging current value is greater than the first reference value (the first battery 410 is being charged by the power from the external charger supplied through the first path, the first charging control circuit 450 may perform a charging current limiting function based on a command of the processor 470, paragraph [0084] where the first IC 450 already gives the signal to processor that the charging current is higher than the reference voltage). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 6, McCoy further discloses the second sensing IC (303B, fig. 3) measure the second charging current value. However, McCoy does not explicitly disclose that wherein the at least one processor is further configured to obtain, from the second sensing IC, a signal indicating identification of the second charging current value being greater than the second reference value. Kim discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to obtain, from the second sensing IC, a signal indicating identification of the second charging current value being greater than the second reference value (the second charging control circuit 460 may perform the charging current limiting function based on the command of the processor 470. For example, the second charging control circuit 460 may limit the current (charging current) input to the second battery 420 to a third specified range by performing the charging current limiting function, paragraph [0089] where the first IC 460 already gives the signal to processor that the charging current is higher than the reference voltage). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regrading claim 7, McCoy discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: identify a third charging current value measured through a third sensing resistor connected to a third battery (an active differential current monitoring system 600 for a battery pack configured with two blocks of parallel batteries, 601A-D and 602A-D, that are connected in series. The battery pack provides power to a device via terminals 607 and 608. The parallel connection of each battery to its neighboring parallel battery(s) is made via a respective differential current measurement module that includes one of switches 603A-D/604A-C, and a respective associated current measuring device 605A-C/606A-C). However, McCoy does not explicitly disclose that set the total charging current to the second value based on a third charging current value, the second value being less than the first value, and wherein the third charging current value is greater than a fifth reference value. Kim discloses that the current flowing to charge the plurality of the batteries are controlled to protect the batteries from overcharging current damage. Kim discloses set the total charging current to the second value based on a third charging current value, the second value being less than the first value, and wherein the third charging current value is greater than a fifth reference value (the power management integrated circuit 440 may, based on the voltages of the batteries, control the charging current to be reduced in a stepwise manner, paragraph [0079]; claims 6-10). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 8, McCoy discloses wherein the first sensing resistor includes a passive device disposed between the first battery and the first sensing IC, without an integrated circuit (IC) configured to limit current, and wherein the second sensing resistor includes a passive device disposed between the second battery and the second sensing IC, without an IC configured to limit current (battery 302 is connected to 303A and battery 301 is connected to 303B, fig. 3 where 303 is a current sense resistor with amplification includes a current sense resistor and amplification hardware so that the voltage drop across the current sense resistor may be kept relatively small (i.e., so that the insertion loss resulting from the sense resistor is relatively small), paragraph [0031]). Regarding claim 9, McCoy discloses a method performed by an electronic device, the method comprising: identifying a measurement value of the total charging current through a first sensing resistor electrically connected to the first battery and the second battery(Current measuring device 303A gives I.sub.total, paragraph [0033]); identifying a second charging current value for the second battery through the second sensing resistor electrically connected the second battery(current measuring device 303B gives I.sub.1, paragraph [0033]), McCoy further discloses monitor the total charging current for both the batteries (A third approach includes a current measuring device to measure I.sub.1 (or I.sub.2), with the value of I.sub.total being acquired from other sources, such as a battery management unit, paragraph [0032]) wherein the first charging current value is identified based on the measurement value of the total charging current and the second charging current value (calculating of I.sub.2 (or I.sub.1) from the measured values, paragraph [0032] and Current measuring device 303A gives I.sub.total, and current measuring device 303B gives I.sub.1; I.sub.2 is equal to the difference between I.sub.total and I.sub.1, allowing calculation of the differential current between batteries 301 and 302, paragraph [0033];the differential current technique is used to find the first charging current value.); However, McCoy is silent about setting a total charging current for charging a first battery and a second battery to a first value and setting the total charging current to a second value less than the first value, based on identifying a first charging current value being greater than a first reference value or the second charging current value being greater than a second reference value, wherein the first charging current value is identified based on the measurement value of the total charging current and the second charging current value. Kim discloses the method of controlling the charging and discharging of plurality of the batteries with the connected processor and IC circuit (figs. 4-5). Kim further discloses setting a total charging current for charging a first battery and a second battery to a first value(the power management integrated circuit 440 may output charging related information during the charging of the first and second batteries 410 and 420. The charging related information may include, for example, at least one of the total charge current, paragraph [0042]shows that the processor set the total charging current for the batteries); and setting the total charging current to a second value less than the first value, based on identifying a first charging current value being greater than a first reference value or the second charging current value being greater than a second reference value, wherein the first charging current value is identified based on the measurement value of the total charging current and the second charging current value (When the total voltage is higher than the third reference voltage, the power management integrated circuit 440 may, based on the voltages of the first and second batteries 410 and 420, control the charging current to be reduced in a stepwise manner, paragraph [0079]). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 10, McCoy in view of Kim discloses a method of claim 9. Kim further discloses the method further comprising setting the total charging current to a third value greater than the first value based on the first charging current value or the second charging current value, wherein the first charging current value is less than a third reference value, and wherein the second charging current value is less than a fourth reference value(When the total voltage is higher than the third reference voltage, the power management integrated circuit 440 may, based on the voltages of the first and second batteries 410 and 420, control the charging current to be reduced in a stepwise manner, paragraph [0079]). And the same process work in opposite side. If the total voltage is less than the reference voltage the applied current increases). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 11, McCoy in view of Kim discloses a method of claim 9. Kim further discloses wherein the measurement value of the total charging current is identified through an interface power management integrated circuit (IF PMIC) (The power management integrated circuit governs charging of the batteries based on an overall state of the batteries, paragraph [0009]); and wherein the second charging current value is identified through a direct current integrated circuit (DC IC) (board 430 which provide direct power to the batteries, fig. 4). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 12, McCoy in view of Kim discloses a method of claim 9. Kim further discloses the method further comprising displaying on a display a notification for indicating an abnormal state of a power path for the first battery or a power path for the second battery based on the second value, wherein a difference between the second value and the first value is greater than a threshold value (paragraph [0100]). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a display to notify the abnormality of the battery on the screen as taught by Kim, in order to . This prevents damage, improves safety, and extends battery life. Regarding claim 13, McCoy further discloses the first sensing circuit (303A, fig. 3) measure the first charging current (paragraph [0032]-[0033]), however, McCoy is silent about obtaining, from a first sensing integrated circuit (IC) connected to the first sensing resistor, a signal notifying that the first charging current value is greater than the first reference value. Kim discloses obtaining, from a first sensing integrated circuit (IC) connected to the first sensing resistor, a signal notifying that the first charging current value is greater than the first reference value (the first battery 410 is being charged by the power from the external charger supplied through the first path, the first charging control circuit 450 may perform a charging current limiting function based on a command of the processor 470, paragraph [0084] where the first IC 450 already gives the signal to processor that the charging current is higher than the reference voltage). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 14, McCoy further discloses the second sensing IC (303B, fig. 3) measure the second charging current value. However, McCoy does not explicitly disclose that obtaining, from a second sensing integrated circuit (IC) connected to the second sensing resistor, a signal indicating the identification of the second charging current value greater than the second reference value. Kim discloses obtaining, from a second sensing integrated circuit (IC) connected to the second sensing resistor, a signal indicating the identification of the second charging current value greater than the second reference value(the second charging control circuit 460 may perform the charging current limiting function based on the command of the processor 470. For example, the second charging control circuit 460 may limit the current (charging current) input to the second battery 420 to a third specified range by performing the charging current limiting function, paragraph [0089] where the first IC 460 already gives the signal to processor that the charging current is higher than the reference voltage). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 15, McCoy in view of Kim discloses the method of claim 9. McCoy further discloses the method further comprising: identifying a third charging current value measured via a third sensing resistor connected to a third battery(an active differential current monitoring system 600 for a battery pack configured with two blocks of parallel batteries, 601A-D and 602A-D, that are connected in series. The battery pack provides power to a device via terminals 607 and 608. The parallel connection of each battery to its neighboring parallel battery(s) is made via a respective differential current measurement module that includes one of switches 603A-D/604A-C, and a respective associated current measuring device 605A-C/606A-C). However, McCoy does not explicitly disclose that setting the total charging current to a second value based on the third charging current value, the second value being less than the first value, and wherein the third charging current value is greater than a fifth reference value. Kim discloses that the current flowing to charge the plurality of the batteries are controlled to protect the batteries from overcharging current damage. Kim discloses setting the total charging current to a second value based on the third charging current value, the second value being less than the first value, and wherein the third charging current value is greater than a fifth reference value(the power management integrated circuit 440 may, based on the voltages of the batteries, control the charging current to be reduced in a stepwise manner, paragraph [0079]; claims 6-10). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 16, McCoy in view of Kim discloses the method of claim 9. McCoy further discloses wherein the first sensing resistor includes a passive device disposed between the first battery and a first sensing integrated circuit (IC), without an IC configured to limit current, and wherein the second sensing resistor includes a passive device disposed between the second battery and a second sensing IC, without an IC configured to limit current (battery 302 is connected to 303A and battery 301 is connected to 303B, fig. 3 where 303 is a current sense resistor with amplification includes a current sense resistor and amplification hardware so that the voltage drop across the current sense resistor may be kept relatively small (i.e., so that the insertion loss resulting from the sense resistor is relatively small), paragraph [0031]) . Regarding claim 17, McCoy discloses An electronic device (fig. 3) comprising: a first battery (302, fig. 1); a second battery (302, fig. 3); a first sensing resistor (303A, fig. 3) connected to the IF PMIC; a second sensing resistor (303B) connected to the DC IC; and wherein the second sensing resistor is disposed between the first sensing resistor and the second battery (303B is connected between 301 and 303A, fig. 3). However, McCoy does not explicitly disclose an interface power management integrated circuit (IF PMIC) configured to charge the first battery and the second battery; a direct current integrated circuit (DC IC). Kim discloses an interface power management integrated circuit (IF PMIC) (440, fig. 4) configured to charge the first battery and the second battery (the power management integrated circuit 440 may use at least some of the power supplied from the external charger to control charging of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420, paragraph [0079]); a direct current integrated circuit (DC IC) (board 430, fig. 4), at least one processor configured to control the IF PMIC and the DC IC (processor 470 connected to PMIC and DC IC and control them, fig. 4). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify McCoy to include PMIC with the first sensing resistor, DC IC with the second sensing resistor, and a processor to control them as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 18, McCoy in view of Kim discloses the electronic device of claim 17. Kim further discloses wherein the IF PMIC and the DC IC are connected through an inter integrated circuit (I2C) (a flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) extending from the first housing structure to the second housing structure and crossing the hinge axis, a power management integrated circuit (PMIC) disposed in the first housing structure and electrically connected to the processor and the FPCB, paragraph [0011]). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Regarding claim 19, McCoy in view of Kim discloses the electronic device of claim 17. McCoy further discloses the electronic device further comprising: a third battery; and a third sensing resistor disposed between the first sensing resistor and the third battery (fig. 6 shows three batteries with their respective sensing resistors). Regarding claim 20, McCoy in view of Kim discloses the electronic device of claim 17. Kim further discloses wherein the first battery is connected to the first sensing resistor through a first flexible printed circuit board (FPCB), wherein the second battery is connected to the second sensing resistor through a second FPCB (paragraph [0011]). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify McCoy to include a processor with the connected integrated circuit to control the charging and discharging of the batteries in a specific manner as taught by Kim, in order to optimize power conversion and enhance the charging efficiency as compared with the conventional discrete control circuit. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SADIA KOUSAR whose telephone number is (571)272-3386. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:30am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian Huffman can be reached at (571) 272-2147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SADIA . KOUSAR Examiner Art Unit 2859 /JULIAN D HUFFMAN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 01, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12580391
SYSTEM FOR CHARGING VEHICLE BATTERY USING MOTOR DRIVING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573859
Battery Pack, System, Operation Status Transmission Method And Program
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12556011
CHARGING PILE WITH PERMANENTLY-HORIZONTAL CHARGING BLOCK AND CHARGING DEVICE HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12549025
BATTERY CONFIGURATION FOR GAS ENGINE REPLACEMENT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12515544
LIGHT PIPE APPARATUS AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+9.4%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 109 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month