Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/311,096

Apparatus and Method for Audio Signal Transformation

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 02, 2023
Examiner
BEKEE, CHIMEZIE EZERIWE
Art Unit
2691
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
11 granted / 16 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
43
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
67.7%
+27.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 16 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment 1. The amendment filed December 22, 2025 has been entered. Claims 1-42 are still pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 2. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claims 1-8, 10, 17, 18, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 34, 36, 37, 39, 40 and 42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Boehm et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2019/0052990 A1, hereinafter "Boehm"). Regarding Claim 1, Boehm teaches an apparatus for audio signal transformation (device for applying DRC gain factors to a HOA signal, Fig. 8, Para. [0050]), comprising: a determination unit (a processor or one or more processing elements of device for applying DRC gain factors to a HOA signal, Para. [0050]) configured for determining, using spherical harmonics information, a transformation rule (gain factors, an iDSHT used with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]) for transforming an audio input signal within a first domain, being different from a spherical harmonics domain (for transforming HOA signal into the spatial domain [first domain] different from the spherical harmonics domain, Para. [0050]), and a transformation unit (a processor or one or more processing elements of device for applying DRC gain factors to a HOA signal, Para. [0050]) configured for transforming, using the transformation rule, the audio input signal, being represented in the first domain, to acquire a transformed audio signal being represented in the first domain (HOA signal is converted into the spatial domain using iDSHT with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, and then transformed in the spatial domain by multiplying with the gain factors to obtain a dynamic range compressed transformed HOA signal, Para. [0050]), wherein the spherical harmonics information comprises information on a plurality of spherical harmonics and/or comprises information being represented in the spherical harmonics domain (an iDSHT is used with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 2, Boehm teaches wherein the audio input signal and the transformed audio signal are represented in the first domain, being a spatial domain, which is different from the spherical harmonics domain (the HOA input signal is represented in the spatial domain, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 3, Boehm teaches wherein the first domain is an equivalent spatial domain (the HOA input signal is represented in the equivalent spatial domain, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 4, Boehm teaches wherein the transformation rule comprises transformation information, wherein the transformation information comprises one or more transformation matrices and/or a plurality of transformation vectors and/or a plurality of coefficients for transforming the audio input signal, being represented in the first domain to acquire the transformed audio signal, being represented in the first domain (gain factors, an iDSHT used with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]), wherein the transformation information depends on the plurality of spherical harmonics (gain factors, an iDSHT used with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 5, Boehm teaches wherein the transformation information depends on transformation information for transforming audio content in the spherical harmonics domain (gain factors, an iDSHT used with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 6, Boehm teaches wherein the transformation information for transforming audio content in the spherical harmonics domain comprises one or more transformation matrices and/or a plurality of transformation vectors and/or a plurality of coefficients for transforming the audio content in the spherical harmonics domain (gain factors, an iDSHT used with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 7, Boehm teaches wherein the determination unit is configured to determine the transformation rule such that the transformation rule is configured to implement a spatial rotation of the audio input signal within the first domain (transformation rule is configured to implement a spatial rotation; gain factors, an iDSHT used with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]), and wherein the transformation unit is configured to transform, using the transformation rule, the audio input signal, being represented in the first domain, by conducting the spatial rotation of the audio input signal in the first domain to acquire the transformed audio signal being represented in the first domain (spatial rotation is conducted when HOA signal is converted into the spatial domain using iDSHT with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, and then transformed in the spatial domain by multiplying with the gain factors to obtain a dynamic range compressed transformed HOA signal, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 8, Boehm teaches wherein the determination unit is configured to determine the transformation rule by determining a rotation matrix or a plurality of rotation vectors or a plurality of coefficients of the rotation matrix within the spherical harmonics domain (transformation rule determines a rotation matrix; gain factors, an iDSHT used with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]), and by converting the rotation matrix of the plurality of rotation vectors or the plurality of coefficients of the rotation matrix from the spherical harmonics domain into the first domain (HOA signal is converted into the spatial domain using iDSHT with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, and then transformed in the spatial domain by multiplying with the gain factors to obtain a dynamic range compressed transformed HOA signal, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 10, Boehm teaches wherein the determination unit is configured to transform the plurality of spatial directions to acquire a plurality of transformed directions of the first domain (an iDSHT used with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]), and wherein the determination unit is configured to determine the transformation rule such that the transformation rule depends on information on the plurality of spherical harmonics for the plurality of transformed directions (an iDSHT used with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 17, Boehm teaches wherein the apparatus is configured to receive a transformation input (device for applying DRC gain factors to a HOA signal, the device comprising a processor or one or more processing elements adapted for receiving a HOA signal and one or more gain factors, Para. [0050]), wherein the determination unit is configured to determine the transformation rule for transforming an audio input signal within the first domain depending on the transformation input (transformation rule is dependent on received HOA signal and gain factors, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 18, Boehm teaches wherein the transformation rule comprises a first transformation matrix (an iDSHT, Para. [0050]), wherein the determination unit is configured to determine a further transformation rule comprising a further transformation matrix (transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]), and wherein the determination unit is configured to determine an interpolated transformation matrix by interpolating between the first transformation matrix and the further transformation matrix (HOA signal is converted into the spatial domain using iDSHT with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 23, Boehm teaches an apparatus for audio signal transformation (device for applying DRC gain factors to a HOA signal, Fig. 8, Para. [0050]), comprising: a first conversion unit (a processor or one or more processing elements of device for applying DRC gain factors to a HOA signal, Para. [0050]) configured for converting an audio input signal from a first domain into an equivalent spatial domain (transforming HOA signal into the spatial domain [equivalent spatial domain], Para. [0050]), wherein the first domain is different from the equivalent spatial domain (HOA domain is different from the equivalent spatial domain, Para. [0050]), a transformation unit (a processor or one or more processing elements of device for applying DRC gain factors to a HOA signal, Para. [0050]) configured for transforming the audio input signal, being represented in the equivalent spatial domain, depending on a transformation rule within the equivalent spatial domain to acquire a transformed audio signal, being represented in the equivalent spatial domain (HOA signal is converted into the equivalent spatial domain using iDSHT with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, and then transformed in the equivalent spatial domain by multiplying with the gain factors to obtain a dynamic range compressed transformed HOA signal, Para. [0050]), and a second conversion unit (a processor or one or more processing elements of device for applying DRC gain factors to a HOA signal, Para. [0050]) for converting the transformed audio signal from the equivalent spatial domain into the first domain (the transformed equivalent spatial domain audio signal is converted back into the HOA domain, Para. [0050]). Regarding Claim 25, it is similarly rejected as Claim 4. Regarding Claim 27, it is similarly rejected as Claim 7. Regarding Claim 29, it is similarly rejected as Claim 17. Regarding Claim 31, it is similarly rejected as Claim 18. Regarding Claim 34, it is similarly rejected as Claim 1. The decoder can be found in Boehm (Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 36, it is similarly rejected as Claim 23. The decoder can be found in Boehm (Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 37, it is similarly rejected as Claim 1. The method can be found in Boehm (Para. [0049]). Regarding Claim 39, it is similarly rejected as Claim 23. The method can be found in Boehm (Para. [0049]). Regarding Claim 40, it is similarly rejected as Claim 1. The non-transitory digital storage medium can be found in Boehm (Para. [0051]). Regarding Claim 42, it is similarly rejected as Claim 23. The non-transitory digital storage medium can be found in Boehm (Para. [0051]). 4. Claims 20-22, 24, 26, 28, 32, 35, 38, and 41 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2016/0104493 A1, hereinafter "Kim"). Regarding Claim 20, Kim teaches an apparatus for audio signal transformation (audio encoder 900 and audio decoder 920, Figs. 30 and 31, Paras. [323] and [0342]), comprising: a first conversion unit (first conversion unit 924, Fig. 31) configured for converting an audio input signal from a first domain into a spherical harmonics domain, wherein the first domain is different from the spherical harmonics domain (first conversion unit 924 converts the 3 transmitted audio signals 905 from the spatial domain [first domain] into the spherical harmonics domain 915, Fig. 31, Paras. [0342] - [0357]), a transformation unit (transformation unit 926, Fig. 31) configured for transforming the audio input signal, being represented in the spherical harmonics domain, depending on a transformation rule within the spherical harmonics domain to acquire a transformed audio signal, being represented in the spherical harmonics domain (transformation unit 926 transforms the audio signal 915 represented in the spherical harmonic domain based on the transformation information 913 within the spherical harmonic domain to acquire a transformed audio signal 903, Fig. 31, Paras. [0342] - [0357]), and a second conversion unit (second conversion unit 914, Fig. 30) for converting the transformed audio signal from the spherical harmonics domain into the first domain (second conversion unit 914 transforms the transformed spherical harmonics domain signal 915 into spatial audio domain signal 905, Fig. 30, Paras. [0323] - [0332]). Regarding Claim 21, Kim teaches wherein the first domain is a spatial domain, which is different from the spherical harmonics domain (first conversion unit 924 converts the 3 transmitted audio signals 905 from the spatial domain [first domain] into the spherical harmonics domain 915, Fig. 31, Paras. [0342] - [0357]). Regarding Claim 22, Kim teaches wherein the first domain is an equivalent spatial domain (first conversion unit 924 converts the 3 transmitted audio signals 905 from the spatial domain [first equivalent spatial domain] into the spherical harmonics domain 915, Fig. 31, Paras. [0342] - [0357]). Regarding Claim 24, Kim teaches wherein the transformation rule comprises transformation information, wherein the transformation information comprises one or more transformation matrices and/or a plurality of transformation vectors and/or a plurality of coefficients for transforming the audio input signal, being represented in the first domain to acquire the transformed audio signal (inverse rotation angle parameter 913 [transformation information], Fig. 31, Para. [0346]). Regarding Claim 26, Kim teaches wherein the transformation rule is configured to implement a spatial rotation of the audio input signal (transformation rule 913 is used to perform rotation on the input signal 915, Fig. 31, Para. [0346]), and wherein the transformation unit is configured to transform, using the transformation rule, the audio input signal by conducting the spatial rotation of the audio input signal (transformation unit 926 may perform a rotation in accordance with the rotation matrix based on the inverse rotation angle parameter 913, Fig. 31 Para. [0346]). Regarding Claim 28, Kim teaches wherein the apparatus is configured to receive a transformation input (receives transformation input 913, Fig. 31), wherein the transformation unit is configured for transforming an audio input signal depending on the transformation input (transformation unit 926 transforms the audio signal 915 based on the transformation information 913, Fig. 31, Paras. [0342] - [0357]). Regarding Claim 32, Kim teaches wherein the apparatus is configured to perform a binauralization processing to the transformed audio signal, being represented in the first domain, to acquire a binaural output (audio signal transformation using a mobile device to create realistic binaural output (Para. [0433]). Regarding Claim 35, it is similarly rejected as Claim 20. Regarding Claim 38, it is similarly rejected as Claim 20. The method can be found in Kim (Paras. [0363] - [0410]). Regarding Claim 41, it is similarly rejected as Claim 20. The non-transitory digital storage medium can be found in Kim (Para. [0363]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claims 9, 19, and 33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boehm et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2019/0052990 A1, hereinafter "Boehm") in view of Kim et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2016/0104493 A1, hereinafter "Kim"). Regarding Claim 9, Boehm fails to explicitly teach wherein the determination unit is configured to determine the transformation rule by determining a rotation matrix or a plurality of rotation vectors or a plurality of coefficients of the rotation matrix directly within the first domain without converting rotation information from the spherical harmonics domain into the first domain. However, Kim teaches wherein the determination unit is configured to determine the transformation rule by determining a rotation matrix without converting rotation information from the spherical harmonics domain into the first domain (soundfield analysis unit 910 is used to obtain rotation angle parameter 911 without converting rotation information from the spherical harmonics domain into the first domain, Fig. 30, Para. [0324]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the audio signal transformation apparatus (as taught by Boehm) to include determining a rotation matrix without converting rotation information from the spherical harmonics domain into the first domain (as taught by Kim). Doing so will lead to less computation and improved efficiency. Regarding Claim 19, Boehm fails to explicitly teach wherein the apparatus is configured to perform a binauralization processing to the transformed audio signal, being represented in the first domain, to acquire a binaural output. However, Kim teaches audio signal transformation using a mobile device to create realistic binaural output (Para. [0433]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the audio signal transformation apparatus (as taught by Boehm) to include binauralization processing to the transformed audio signal in the first domain to acquire a binaural output (as taught by Kim). Doing so will provide a highly realistic sound experience (Kim Para. [0433]). Regarding Claim 33, it is similarly rejected as claim 19. 7. Claim 30 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2016/0104493 A1, hereinafter "Kim") in view of Boehm et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2019/0052990 A1, hereinafter "Boehm"). Regarding Claim 30, Kim fails to explicitly teach wherein the transformation unit is configured to determine an interpolated transformation matrix by interpolating between the first transformation matrix and the further transformation matrix. However, Boehm teaches wherein the transformation unit is configured to determine an interpolated transformation matrix by interpolating between the first transformation matrix and the further transformation matrix (HOA signal is converted into the spatial domain using iDSHT with a transform matrix obtained from spherical positions of virtual loudspeakers and quadrature gains q, Para. [0050]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the audio signal transformation apparatus (as taught by Kim) to include interpolating between the first transformation matrix and the further transformation matrix (as taught by Boehm). Doing so will lead to improved computational efficiency. Allowable Subject Matter 8. Claims 11-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments 9. Applicant's arguments filed December 22, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding independent Claim 1, applicant argues (see applicant’s remark, pages 18-21), Boehm clear outlines: ... receiving a HOA signal and one or more gain factors, transforming 40 the HOA signal into the spatial domain ... In other words an HOA signal, which is by definition represented in the Higher Order Ambisonics (HOA) domain, is to be transformed from that Higher Order Ambisonics domain to the spatial domain. In contrast, claim 1 defines: transformation rule for transforming an audio input signal within a first domain ... In response to applicant’s argument above, Boehm teaches HOA audio signal transformed into the spatial domain [mapped as the first domain different from a spherical harmonics domain] and the spatial domain undergoes transformation by multiplying with gain factors to obtain a dynamic range compressed signal [i.e. a gain based transform still within the spatial domain] (see Figs. 7 and 8, Paras. [0012], and [0045]-[0050]). Independent Claims 1, 23, 34, 36, 37, 39, 40, and 42 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 as being anticipated by Boehm. The rejections of Claims 1, 23, 34, 36, 37, 39, 40, and 42 under 35 U.S.C. 102 as being anticipated by Boehm are maintained. Dependent Claims 2-8, 10, 17, and 18 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 as being anticipated by Boehm. The rejections of Claims 2-8, 10, 17, and 18 under 35 U.S.C. 102 as being anticipated by Boehm are maintained. Dependent Claims 9, 19, and 33 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boehm in view of Kim. The rejections of Claims 9, 19, and 33 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boehm in view of Kim are maintained. Conclusion 10. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Jax et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2012/0155653 A1) teaches representing spatial audio scenes using higher-order Ambisonics HOA technology. Magariyachi et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2019/0007783 A1) teaches an audio processing device with a matrix generation unit which generates a vector for each time-frequency with a head-related transfer function obtained by spherical harmonic transform by spherical harmonics. 11. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 12. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHIMEZIE E BEKEE whose telephone number is (571)272-0202. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7.30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHIMEZIE EZERIWE BEKEE/Examiner, Art Unit 2691 /DUC NGUYEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 22, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602426
RECORDLESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604146
BEAMFORMING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586595
APPARATUS, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR ENCODING AN AUDIO SIGNAL OR FOR DECODING AN ENCODED AUDIO SCENE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585145
SMART WEARABLE GLASSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587798
Headphones with Sound-Enhancement and Integrated Self-Administered Hearing Test
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 16 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month