Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/311,193

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION CHARGING CIRCUIT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 02, 2023
Examiner
TSO, EDWARD H
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1098 granted / 1260 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1297
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§103
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1260 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The IDS filed 5/2/23 has been considered and placed of record. The initialed copy is attached herewith. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Correction of the following is required: “The electronic function circuit 16” should be explicitly defined as “a load” because the limitation “a load” is mentioned generally once in paragraph 0007 and no circuit is associated with “a load” in the disclosure. It is firstly defined in at least claim 5. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because the box labeled as “power reception circuit 24” in figures 3-8 is supposed to be “charging circuit 24.” The power reception circuit is designated as reference number 20. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(a) The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Re claim 1, the limitation “a voltage conversion circuit” on line 9 is unclear because there are three “voltage conversion circuits” labeled as 15, 23 and 31 described in the drawings. For examination purpose, the Examiner assumes the “voltage conversion circuit 15” is the claimed “voltage conversion circuit.” The limitation “a load connected to the voltage conversion circuit” on line 11 is confusing because the limitation “a load” is mentioned generally once in paragraph 0007 and no circuit is associated with “a load.” Re claims 2-4 and 15-20, they are rejected for depending on rejected claims Re claims 5 and 10-14, the limitation “the load includes an electronic function circuit” is confusing because there is no explicit mention of the load being associated with the electronic function circuit in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2, 8, 10, 13, 18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re claim 2, the limitation “the communication period” on line 2 lacks proper antecedent basis. Re claims 8, 10, 13, 18 and 20, the claims are indefinite for depending directly or indirectly on indefinite claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(a)/(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 1st paragraph/2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The art made of record fails to disclose or suggest a wireless communication charging circuit system having, at least, a communication circuit that is electrically connected to the communication antenna and is configured to perform communication with the reader-writer device using the communication antenna; and a control circuit that includes a microcontroller that is configured to control operation and stopping of the voltage conversion circuit and operation and stopping of the charging circuit, wherein during a period in which communication with the reader-writer device is to be performed using the communication antenna, the communication circuit is configured to cause the reader-writer device to recognize the communication circuit and communicate with the reader-writer device, and the control circuit is configured to set a power path so that power used by the microcontroller is supplied from the power storage device, and during a period in which charging of the power storage device is to be performed by the reader-writer device, the communication circuit is configured to cause the reader-writer device to recognize the communication circuit and operate so as to generate a magnetic field, and the control circuit is configured to set a power path so that power used by the microcontroller is supplied from the power reception circuit. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Art made of record exemplified various RFID card with communication circuit. Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to the Examiner at the below-listed number. The Examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Thu from 7:00am-5:00pm. The Examiner’s SPE is Taelor Kim and he can be reached at 571.270.7166. The fax number for the organization where this application is assigned is 571.273.8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866.217.9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800.786.9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571.272.1000. /EDWARD TSO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 571.272.2087
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603523
ELECTRONIC CHARGING SHELF SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597782
CHARGER INCLUDING MULTIPLE ADJUSTABLE POWER SOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597787
DATA LINE AND CHARGING DEVICE WITH SWITCHABLE CONFIGURATION CHANNEL CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587022
A BATTERY STORAGE SYSTEM WITH MULTI-LEVEL CONVERTER AND MULTIPLE STORAGE SECTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580418
GROUND ASSEMBLY FOR AN INDUCTIVE CHARGING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.1%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1260 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month