Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/311,451

ELECTRONIC COMPONENT WITH ALIGNED DIE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 03, 2023
Priority
May 04, 2022 — FI 20225383
Examiner
MOVVA, AMAR
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
611 granted / 770 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
795
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
72.0%
+32.0% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 770 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, species B (claims 1, 3, 13, 14 and 16) in the reply filed on 2-2-2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 13, 14, and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yaku (US 2013/0181353). [claim 1] An electronic component (fig. 12-14, fig. 1-11 could also be used, note that the only difference between the two figure sets is that fig. 1-11 and fig. 12-14 is that 1-11 has one single continuous die aligning element 18 while fig. 12-14 may have it discontinuous 32, see fig. 1 and 12, [0050]) comprising: a support that includes a die-attachment surface (16, fig. 12, 14) that defines a horizontal plane (extending side to side, fig. 12), with a vertical direction (into the page in fig. 12) being perpendicular to the horizontal plane; a first die (14, fig. 12, 14) that is vertically fixed to the die-attachment surface with a die-attach material (34, fig. 12,14, see [0053] which explains the adhesive bond between the die and the substrate); and a die-aligning element (32B, 32C, fig. 12, 14) that is adjacent to the die-attachment surface and that is integral with at least one of the support or a packaging structure that is rigidly attached to the support (fig. 14, [0053]), wherein the die-aligning element comprises a first die-alignment wall that is horizontally fixed to a first side of the first die with the die-attach material (34, fig. 14, [0053]), and wherein a second side of the first die that is opposite to the first side of the first die is horizontally unfixed (unfixed from the die-aligning element, 32, fig. 12). [claim 3] The electronic component according to claims claim 1, wherein a vertical distance from the die-attachment surface to a bond line between the first die and the die-attach material is D (D is near zero as can be seen in fig. 14, [0053]), and a vertical height of the first die is H (side of the die 14, see fig. 14, see also fig. 5) , and wherein the first die-alignment wall has a first wall height (fig. 14, fig. 5) in the vertical direction that is greater than D and less than D + H/2 (fig. 14, fig. 5). [claim 13] The electronic component according to claim 1, wherein the die-aligning element comprises a cuboid shape (see e.g. the example of fig. 8). [claim 14] An electronic component (fig. 12-14, fig. 1-11 could also be used, note that the only difference between the two figure sets is that fig. 1-11 and fig. 12-14 is that 1-11 has one single continuous die aligning element 18 while fig. 12-14 may have it discontinuous 32, see fig. 1 and 12, [0050]) comprising: a support that includes a die-attachment surface (16, fig. 12, 14) that defines a horizontal plane (extending side to side, fig. 12), with a vertical direction (into the page in fig. 12) being perpendicular to the horizontal plane; a die-aligning element (32B, 32C, fig. 12, 14) that is integral with the support and that includes a first die- alignment wall that vertically extends from the die-attachment surface (fig. 14, [0053]); and a first die (14, fig. 12, 14) that is vertically fixed to the die-attachment surface with a die-attach material (34, fig. 14, [0053]) and that includes a first side that is horizontally fixed to the die-aligning element with the die- attach material (34, fig. 14, [0053]), wherein a second side of the first die that is opposite to the first side of the first die is horizontally unfixed (unfixed from the die-aligning element, 32, fig. 12). [claim 16] The electronic component according to claims 14. wherein a vertical distance from the die-attachment surface to a bond line between the first die and the die-attach material is D (D is near zero as can be seen in fig. 14, [0053]), and a vertical height of the first die is H (side of the die 14, see fig. 14, see also fig. 5), and wherein the first die-alignment wall has a first wall height in the vertical direction that is greater than D and less than D + H/2 (fig. 14, fig. 5). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMAR MOVVA whose telephone number is (571)272-9009. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio Maldonado can be reached at 571-272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMAR MOVVA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672293
MEMORY DEVICE ASSEMBLY WITH A LEAKER DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660206
THREE-DIMENSIONAL NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE WITH FILAMENT CONFINEMENT
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660317
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660154
MICROELECTRONIC DEVICES, AND RELATED METHODS OF FORMING MICROELECTRONIC DEVICES
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660203
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, METHOD OF FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE HAVING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 770 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month