Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/311,622

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING DYNAMIC FEEDBACK DURING SCANNING OF A DENTAL OBJECT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 03, 2023
Examiner
DULANEY, BENJAMIN O
Art Unit
2683
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
3Shape A/S
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
349 granted / 565 resolved
At TC average
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
591
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 565 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement IDS filed 10/30/23 is acknowledged, the references therein relating to the general background of applicant’s invention. Claim Objections Claim 11 is objected to because of the following informalities: the 3rd line appears to be missing the word “representation” between “three-dimensional” and “has”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. “A dental object” is defined multiple times in lines 1 and 3 and is then referred to as “the dental object” making it unclear as to which dental object is meant. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 2-21 are rejected because they incorporate the language of claim 1. Claim 17 recites the limitation "the brightness level" in the 2nd line. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. NOTE: Claims 1-21 would be allowable if the rejections above were properly overcome without modifying the scope of the claims. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the prior art does not contain a valid combination of references that disclose an intraoral scanning device for scanning a dental object comprising a projector that projects a pattern of light onto the dental object, an image sensor for acquiring images, processors for generating a 3D representation of the dental object based on scan patches, updating the 3D representation based on registration of new scan patches wherein the processors determine the amount of overlap between the 3D representation and the new scan patches, and the system provides auditory feedback correlating with the overlap, wherein the feedback comprises a plurality of sound pulses separated by a time delay wherein the delay is adjusted based on the overlap. Similar prior art such as U.S. patent application publication 2015/0221084 by Adamson discloses determining overlap of image patches in a dental scan while U.S. patent application publication 2022/0241056 by Salah et al. discloses changing a beeping frequency depending on the positioning of a camera, however the prior art fails to disclose changing a time delay of sound pulses based upon a determined overlap of new scan patches added to a 3D image. Claims 2-21 would be allowable because they depend upon claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN O DULANEY whose telephone number is (571)272-2874. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abderrahim Merouan can be reached at (571)270-5254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BENJAMIN O. DULANEY Primary Examiner Art Unit 2676 /BENJAMIN O DULANEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2683
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597136
APPARATUS AND METHOD OF RECORDING A STORAGE LOCATION BY SIZE FOR HARVESTED TUBERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592998
NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM HAVING CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590841
Thermal Imaging for Self-Driving Cars
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588874
OPTIMIZING CHECKPOINT LOCATIONS ALONG AN INSERTION TRAJECTORY OF A MEDICAL INSTRUMENT USING DATA ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586185
BLOOD FLOW EXTRACTION IMAGE FORMING DEVICE, METHOD OF FORMING BLOOD FLOW EXTRACTION IMAGE, AND BLOOD FLOW EXTRACTION IMAGE FORMING PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 565 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month