Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/311,895

METHODS OF ISOLATING AND DETECTING VIRUSES FROM LIQUID WITH POSSIBILITY OF CONTAINING VIRUSES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 04, 2023
Examiner
EMCH, GREGORY S
Art Unit
1678
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Jnc Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
305 granted / 615 resolved
-10.4% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+43.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
652
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§103
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 615 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-8 are pending and under examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujita (US 20070105094). Current invention directs to a method of isolating viruses from a liquid sample. The principle lies in using characteristic of outer shell phospholipid of virus and trapping with polymer coated magnetic particles where the polymer having affinity of the virus phospholipid (i.e. aggregating agent) followed by masking agent which can enhance homogeneous dispersion of the virus magnetic particle complex and then isolate the virus through magnetism. Fujita teaches mixing a virus containing liquid sample with magnetic fine particle wherein the magnetic particles having cationic functional group thereon capable of trapping a phospholipid vesicle virus (Title, abstract; section 0018). Fujita further teaches using (1) aggregating agent capable of enhancing forming virus-magnetic particles complex; (2) masking agent enhancing homogeneously dispersing in the liquid solution (section 0018; 0049). The magnetic particles used is water-soluble having hydroxyl group, cationic and with magnetism capability (section 0021). In addition, as to the masking agent, Fujita teaches using poly(meth)acrylic acid as a masking agent having an average molecular weight of 10,000 to 50,000 (section 0021; 0031-0032). The virus can be isolated by the magnetism separation (section 0016-0019; 0059, 0081). However, Fujita does not explicitly teach adding the masking agent to the mixed solution in a concentration range of 0.01-0.1 mass%. It is noted, in examples of making masking agent, Fujita uses higher molecular weight of “polyacrylic acid 2500” (MW=25000, 250 mg) and “polyacrylic acid 5000”(MW=50000, 250 mg)(section 0180-0181). The mass% for the masking agents is about (250 mg/(99.75g ultra pure water +0.1ml diethy pyrocarbonate))x100% ≅ 0.25%. Fujita also teaches using poly(meth)acrylic but this compound is not used in the examples for demonstration (section 0039, 0044). The current invention uses poly(meth)acrylic acid as the masking agent having a wider molecular weight range for, from 5000-100000 comparing to “polyacrylic acid 2500” (MW=25000)” and “polyacrylic acid 5000”(MW=50000)”. Therefore, before using the current method of isolating viruses from samples, it would have been prima facie obvious to one ordinary skilled person in the art to perform a preliminary test for a new similar masking agent poly(meth)acrylic based on the known similar polyacrylic acid and establish a response range around the mass 0.25% (e.g. 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 %...) for purpose of optimizing the assay. Preliminary optimization is well-known and commonly practiced in the field. One artisan in the field would have been motivated to do so for optimizing the overall assay. As to claim 2, the method can be used to isolate influenza virus (section 0029). As to claim 4, the water-soluble cationic magnetic particles containing magnetitie, maghemite, hematitie, or goethite or latex beads (section 0024, 0027, claim 3). As to claim 5, the average particle size is about 300 nm (section 0022). As to claim 6, Fujita teaches that the aggregating agent can be a polymer having structure of polyalkylene glycol structure in a main chain, and one of the agents used is polyethylene glycol (section 0034 and 0114). As to claim 7-8, Fujita also teaches denaturing, dispersing, extracting, amplifying virus and its nucleic acids for further characterization (detection) by PCR (section 0067-0068; 0134). Claim(s) 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujita as applied to claims 1-2 and 4-8 above, and further in view of Pérez-Cataluña (Science of Total Environment 2021 758:143870). Fujita reference has been discussed above, and the virus scope of Fujita include influenza virus, cytemegalo virus, HIV, papilloma virus, respiratory syncytial virus, poliomyelitis virus, pox virus, measles virus, arbovirus, coxsackievirus, herpes virus, hantavirus, hepatitis virus, Lyme disease virus, mumps virus and rotavirus (section 0029). However Fujita does not explicitly cover isolation and detection of SARS-CoV-2. Since the outbreak of SARS-Cov-2 at the end of 2019 (COVID-19 pandemic), SARS-Cov-2 has been a focal attention in public and medicine with respect to its detection, treatment and vaccination. Pérez-Cataluña teaches detecting SARS-Cov-2 in wastewater for epidemiology tracking, known as wastewater-based epidemiology (WEB)(page 143871, left column). WEB has been implemented globally for detection SARS-Cov-2 and shed lights into epidemiology study in wastewater, sewers and sludges (page 14371, left column). Pérez-Cataluña also teaches isolating nucleic acid from wastewater samples and detecting SARS-Cov-2 virus (See Materials and Methods, page 2-3). Therefore, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the methodology of Fujita to isolate and detect SARS-Cov-2 as taught by Pérez-Cataluña in isolating and detecting SARS-Cov-2 virus because of public health concern. One ordinary skilled person in the field would have been motivated to do so because of the importance in epidemiological survey of SARS-Cov-2 and its impact on health as well as commerce. See, e.g., “Conclusions” section of pp. 4-5 of Pérez-Cataluña. The artisan would have had a reasonable expectation of success based on the cumulative disclosures of these prior art references. Conclusion No claim is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHANGHWA J CHEU whose telephone number is (571)272-0814. The examiner can normally be reached 8 am to 8 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gregory Emch can be reached at 5712728149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CHANGHWA J. CHEU Primary Examiner Art Unit 1678 /CHANGHWA J CHEU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1678
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 04, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600799
ANTI-IgG NANOBODIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12570710
TARGETING LILRB4 WITH CAR-T OR CAR-NK CELLS IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12332252
GFAP ACCUMULATING IN STROKE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 17, 2025
Patent 12138261
INHIBITORS OF BCL-2
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 12, 2024
Patent 12071479
Antibodies Against ILT2 and Use Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 27, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+43.6%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 615 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month