Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/314,201

METHOD OF PRODUCING DOUBLE-SIDED PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE SHEET AND DOUBLE-SIDED PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE SHEET

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 09, 2023
Examiner
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nitto Denko Corporation
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
645 granted / 1141 resolved
-8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1192
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1141 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on January 16, 2026 has been entered. Withdrawn Rejections Any rejections and or objections, made in the previous Office Action, and not repeated below, are hereby withdrawn due to Applicant’s amendments and/or arguments in the response dated December 17, 2025. However, new rejections may have been made using the same prior art if still applicable to the newly presented amendments and/or arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3, 4 and 10 – 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shirai et al. (USPGPub 2011/0070430 A1) in view of Ikemura et al. (JP 2021134274 A) and Mitsui Kazuma et al. (EP 2492330 A2). Shirai et al. disclose a double-sided pressure-sensitive adhesive sheet (Figures 1 and 2; Abstract) comprising: a substrate film having a first surface and a second surface opposite the first surface (Figures 1 and 2, #10), the substrate film having a thickness of 12 μm or less (Paragraphs 0014, 0099, and 0105; a first pressure-sensitive adhesive layer disposed on the first surface, having a first adhesive surface opposite the substrate film, and formed from a first water-dispersed pressure-sensitive adhesive composition (Figures 1 and 2, #22; Paragraphs 0035 - 0092); a second pressure-sensitive adhesive layer disposed on the second surface, having a second adhesive surface opposite the substrate film, and formed from a second water-dispersed pressure-sensitive adhesive composition (Figures1 and 2, #21; Paragraphs 0035 - 0092); and a release liner in releasable contact with the first adhesive surface (Figures 1 and 2, #31), wherein the first water-dispersed pressure-sensitive adhesive composition contains a water-dispersible polymer, water, and a leveling agent (Paragraph 0091) as in claim 3. With respect to claim 4, the second pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is formed from a coating film of the second water-dispersed pressure-sensitive adhesive composition applied to the substrate film (Paragraph 0092). Regarding claims 13 and 14, the first release liner has a thickness of 35 μm or more (Figure 1, #31; Paragraphs 0036 and 0107). Regarding claims 10 – 12, the substrate film includes an anchoring layer forming the first surface and/or an anchoring layer forming the second surface (Paragraphs 0016, 0100 and 0101). However, Shirai et al. fail to disclose the thickener includes a carboxylic acid copolymer thickener and a polyacrylic thickener, a blending ratio of the leveling agent to 100 parts by mass of the water-dispersible polymer is 0.1 parts by mass or more and 2 parts by mass or less, and wherein a ratio of the thickener in a solid content of the first water-dispersed pressure-sensitive adhesive composition is 1% by mass or more and 3% by mass or less, and the second release liner having a thickness of 25 μm or less. Ikemura et al. teach a water-dispersed pressure-sensitive adhesive composition (Abstract) containing a leveling agent (Page 4, lines 40 – 48) in a blending ratio of the leveling agent to 100 parts by mass of the water-dispersible polymer is 0.1 parts by mass or more and 2 parts by mass or less (Page 5, lines 9 – 25), and wherein a ratio of the thickener in a solid content of the first water-dispersed pressure-sensitive adhesive composition is 1% by mass or more and 3% by mass or less (Page 5, lines 26 – 31) for the purpose of having a desired viscosity and surface tension (Page 5, lines 20 – 25). Mitsui Kazuma et al. teach a water-dispersed pressure-sensitive adhesive composition (Abstract) having the thickener includes a carboxylic acid copolymer thickener and a polyacrylic thickener (Paragraphs 0066 – 0069 and 0128) for the purpose of having an adhesive with a higher viscosity and resistant to dimple effects (Paragraph 0066). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a thickener includes a carboxylic acid and polyacrylic, a leveling agent in a blending ratio of the leveling agent to 100 parts by mass of the water-dispersible polymer is 0.1 parts by mass or more and 2 parts by mass or less and wherein a ratio of the thickener in a solid content of the first water-dispersed pressure-sensitive adhesive composition is 1% by mass or more and 3% by mass or less in Shirai et al. in order to have a desired viscosity and surface tension as taught by Ikemura et al. to have an adhesive with a higher viscosity and resistant to dimple effects as taught by Mitsui Kazuma et al. With regard to the limitations of “the second release liner is thinner than the first release liner, and the second release liner having a thickness of 25 μm or less”, Shirai et al. clearly discloses having a release liner in releasable contact with the adhesive surface, the release liner having a thickness of 25 μm or less (Figure 1, #32; Paragraphs 0036 and 0107), wherein the thickness of the release liner may be selected according to the purpose of the release liner (Paragraph 0107). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the applicant’s invention was made to have two release liners with two different thicknesses, since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the size of a component. A change in size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. MPEP 2144.04. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 3, 4 and 10 – 17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Please see the newly presented rejection in view of Mitsui Kazuma et al. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Patricia L Nordmeyer whose telephone number is (571)272-1496. The examiner can normally be reached 10am - 6:30pm EST, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Patricia L. Nordmeyer/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /pln/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 January 28, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 21, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 22, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 30, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 05, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577436
EMBOSSING OR DEBOSSING OF A LABEL SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12557867
ADHESIVE MOUNTABLE STACK OF REMOVABLE LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552130
TRANSPARENT SOLDER MASK PROTECTION FILM, METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME, AND METHOD FOR USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12547210
TAPE MEMBER AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12548474
LABEL WITH STAND-UP MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+37.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1141 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month