Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/314,381

RAILING ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS OF INSTALLATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 09, 2023
Priority
May 16, 2022 — provisional 63/342,227
Examiner
HALL, ZACHARY A
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
UFP Industries, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
83 granted / 138 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +51% interview lift
Without
With
+51.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
163
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
75.1%
+35.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 138 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) were submitted on 09 May 2023 and 02 December 2024. The submissions are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9, 13-14, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable over Martin (US 10,794,063 B1). Regarding claim 1, Martin discloses a railing system (see Fig. 12) comprising: at least one post (122-123 in Fig. 12); at least one rod (121b-d in Fig. 12) defining a first distal end and a second distal end (see Fig. 12); and at least one connector assembly (10 in Figs. 1-3) operably coupling one of the first distal end or the second distal end of the at least one rod to the at least one post (see Figs. 7-9 for example), wherein the at least one connector assembly is configured for movably coupling the at least one rod to the at least one post such that the at least one rod is pivotable relative to the at least one post in at least one plane of movement (see Abstract). Regarding claim 2, Martin discloses wherein the at least one post (122-123 in Fig. 12) comprises at least a first post (122) and a second post (123), the second post spaced apart from the first post (see Fig. 12), the at least one rod (121b-d) extending between the first post and the second post (see Fig. 12). Regarding claim 3, Martin discloses wherein the at least one connector assembly (10 in Figs. 1-3) comprises at least a first connector assembly (A in annotated Figure 12 below) movably coupling the one of the first distal end or the second distal end to the first post (122 in Fig. 12) and a second connector assembly (B in annotated Figure 12 below) movably coupling the other of the first distal end or the second distal end to the second post (123 in Fig. 12). PNG media_image1.png 466 1124 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 1. Annotated Figure 12. Regarding claim 4, Martin discloses wherein the at least one connector assembly (10 in Figs. 1-3) is configured for movably coupling the at least one rod (121b-d in Fig. 12) to the at least one post (122-123 in Fig. 12) such that the at least one rod is pivotable relative to the at least one post in multiple planes of movement (see Abstract and see Fig. 12). Regarding claim 5, Martin discloses wherein the at least one connector assembly (10 in Figs. 1-3) is configured for movably coupling the at least one rod (121b-d in Fig. 12) to the at least one post (122-123 in Fig. 12) such that the at least one rod is pivotable relative to the at least one post in at least a vertical plane of movement and a horizontal plane of movement (see Abstract and see Fig. 12). Regarding claim 6, Martin discloses further comprising a rail (121a in Fig. 12) extending perpendicularly from the at least one post (122-123 in Fig. 12). Regarding claim 7, Martin discloses further comprising at least one support (15 in Figs. 1-3) coupled to the at least one rod (121b-d in Fig. 12), the at least one support spaced from and extending generally parallel to the at least one post (122-123 in Fig. 13, see NOTE below). NOTE: See in the Abstract, Figs. 1-3, and Fig. 13 that the support (15) can be moved relative to the post and therefore can be placed in a generally parallel position with respect to the post. Generally parallel is not defined in the specification and is therefore interpreted to mean any angle other than perpendicular to the post. Regarding claim 8, Martin discloses wherein the at least one support (15 in Figs. 1-3) is further coupled to at least one of the rail (121a in Fig. 12, see Fig. 12) and a support surface upon which the railing system is assembled (see Fig. 12). Regarding claim 9, Martin discloses wherein the at least one connector assembly (10 in Figs. 1-3) comprises: a ball (14 in Figs. 1-3) coupled to the one of the first distal end or the second distal end of the at least one rod (121b-d in Fig. 12); and a seat (12 in Figs. 1-3) coupled to the at least one post (122-123 in Fig. 12) and adapted to at least partially retain and pivotably receive the ball within the seat (see Figs. 1-3), wherein pivotal movement of the ball within the seat operably couples the at least one rod for pivotable movement relative to the at least one post in the at least one plane of movement (see Abstract and Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 13, Martin discloses wherein the connector assembly (10 in Figs. 1-3) further comprises a plate (11 in Figs. 1-3) coupled to and protruding outwardly from a wall of the at least one post (122-123 in Fig. 13), the plate defining at least one opening (see Fig. 1 for example) forming at least a portion of the seat (12 in Figs. 1-3), wherein at least a portion of the ball (14 in Figs. 1-3) is positioned behind the plate when the ball is retained within the opening (see Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 14, Martin discloses a connector assembly (10 in Figs. 1-3) for operably coupling a rod (121b-d in Fig. 12) to a post (122-123 in Fig. 12) within a railing system (see Fig. 12), the connector assembly comprising: a ball (14 in Figs. 1-3) coupled to an end of the rod (see Fig. 12 for example); and a seat (12 in Figs. 1-3) coupled to the post and adapted to at least partially retain and pivotably receive the ball within the seat (see Figs. 1-3), wherein pivotal movement of the ball within the seat operably couples the rod for pivotable movement relative to the post in at least one plane of movement (see Abstract). Regarding claim 20, Martin discloses further comprising a plate (11 in Figs. 1-3) coupled to and protruding outwardly from a wall of the post (122-123, see Fig. 12), the plate defining at least one opening (see Figs. 1-3) forming at least a portion of the seat (see Figs. 1-3), wherein at least a portion of the ball is positioned behind the plate when the ball is retained within the at least one opening (see Figs. 1-3). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZACHARY A HALL whose telephone number is (571)272-5907. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday 8:00am to 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Anderson can be reached on 571-270-5281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZAH/Examiner, Art Unit 3678 /AMBER R ANDERSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3678
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635090
Fast-locking Structure of LED Display Module and Its Disassembly and Assembly Method
1y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12595661
LENGTH ADJUSTABLE RAILING PANEL WITH REMOVABLE UPRIGHT END RAILS
4y 10m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576503
CONNECTION ASSEMBLY FOR A HAND-GUIDED MACHINE TOOL AND HAND-GUIDED MACHINE TOOL
4y 9m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560198
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTI-DOF CROSS-PIVOT FLEXURE BEARING WITH ENHANCED RANGE AND ENHANCED LOAD CAPACITY
5y 3m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560189
JOINT STRUCTURE
4y 0m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+51.0%)
3y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 138 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month