Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/314,804

SCHEDULING ENHANCEMENTS FOR TRANSMIT OPPORTUNITY SHARING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 09, 2023
Examiner
CHRISS, ANDREW W
Art Unit
2472
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 4m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
150 granted / 208 resolved
+14.1% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 4m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
267
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 208 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 20 January 2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Applicant’s response, filed 20 January 2026, has been entered and carefully considered. Claims 1, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 19 and 20 are amended. Claims 5 and 12 are canceled. Claims 1-4, 6-11 and 13-20 are currently pending. The outstanding rejection of Claims 1-3, 6-11, 13-18 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) is withdrawn in light of Applicant’s amendment to Claims 1, 9 and 16. The outstanding rejection of Claims 4 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. 103 is withdrawn in light of Applicant’s amendment to said claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1, 9 and 16 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 20 February 2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-3, 6-10, 13-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xia et al (WIPO Publication 2022/118136), hereinafter Xia (already of record, cited on Applicant’s IDS filed September 17, 2024), in view of Kim et al (WIPO Publication 2024/191182), hereinafter Kim. Citations from Kim are taken from the provided machine translation of the reference. Regarding Claim 1, Xia discloses an apparatus for wireless communications (Figure 14, non-AP STA hardware setup), comprising: at least one transceiver (Figure 14 – RF module 404 coupled to antennas 406a-406n; see also paragraph 00179) at least one memory comprising executable instructions (paragraph 00178 and paragraph 00538, the station comprises an associated memory storing instructions that are executed by the processor); one or more processors configured to execute the executable instructions to cause the apparatus (paragraphs 00178 and 00538) to: transmit, via the at least one transceiver, a first frame that includes a request for a network allocation vector (NAV) setting associated with a shared transmission opportunity (TXOP) (Figure 46 and paragraphs 00380-00382, wherein a non-AP STA sends a Share Offer/Request frame (1512) to an AP indicating an offer/request for shared TXOP access); receive, via the at least one transceiver, a second frame triggering the shared TXOP (Figure 46 and paragraph 00383, wherein the AP then sends a shareability frame (1518) to other transmitters in the BSS, as well as an AP in a different BSS, triggering the shared TXOP); and communicate, via the at least one transceiver during the shared TXOP, with a NAV associated with the request (Figure 46 and paragraph 00384, the devices communicate using either NAV (share offer/req) or NAV (OBSS share)). However, while Xia discloses the share offer/request frame does include a duration (Figures 77-78 and paragraphs 00507-00508), Xia does not disclose the request indicates a NAV duration for the NAV setting. In an analogous art, Kim discloses this. Specifically, at Figure 17 and paragraphs 275-276, Kim discloses a TXOP initiation frame (i.e., request frame) send by a non-AP STA that comprises a duration of the obtainable TXOP. This duration field of the TXOP is used by recipients to set NAVs (as described in paragraph 481). Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Xia and Kim. One would have been motivated to do so in order to avoid transmission collisions between stations in a network (refer to paragraphs 126-127 of Kim). Claim 16 comprises the same limitations as Claim 1, claimed as a method. Therefore, Claim 16 is rejected using the same rationale as presented above regarding Claim 1. Regarding Claims 2 and 17, Xia further discloses select(ing) the NAV setting, from a plurality of NAV settings having different durations (Figures 77-78 and paragraphs 00507-00508, wherein the Share Offer/Request and Share Offer/Request Info frame formats comprise a duration (which can be set to a number of microseconds)); and includ(ing), in the request, a field that indicates the selected NAV setting (Figures 77-78 and paragraphs 00507-00508, the number of microseconds is included in the transmitted frame). Regarding Claims 3 and 18, Xia further discloses at least a first duration of the different durations corresponds to a duration of the shared TXOP (Figures 77-78 and paragraphs 00507-00508, wherein the Share Offer/Request and Share Offer/Request Info frame formats comprise a duration (which can be set to a number of microseconds) of the shared TXOP). Regarding Claim 6, Xia further discloses the first frame includes a request for the shared TXOP (Figure 46 and paragraphs 00380-00382, wherein a non-AP STA sends a Share Offer/Request frame (1512) to an AP indicating an offer/request for shared TXOP access). Regarding Claim 7, Xia further discloses the request requests that the NAV setting be applied for just the shared TXOP (Figures 77-78 and paragraphs 00507-00508, wherein the Share Offer/Request and Share Offer/Request Info frame formats comprise a duration of the shared TXOP (which can be set to a number of microseconds)), therefore meeting the claimed alternative limitation. Regarding Claim 8, Xia further discloses the apparatus is configured as a wireless station (Figure 14 and paragraph 00177, non-AP STA hardware setup). Regarding Claim 9, Xia discloses an apparatus for wireless communications at a first wireless node (Figure 14 and paragraph 00178 – WLAN station operating as a first AP), comprising: at least one transceiver (Figure 14 – RF module 404 coupled to antennas 406a-406n; see also paragraph 00179); at least one memory comprising executable instructions (paragraph 00538, the station comprises an associated memory storing instructions that are executed by the processor); one or more processors configured to execute the executable instructions to cause the apparatus (paragraph 00538, the communication stations disclosed comprise one or more computer processor devices executing instructions stored by the memory) to: receive, via the at least one transceiver, a first frame that includes a request for a network allocation vector (NAV) setting associated with a shared transmission opportunity (TXOP) (Figure 46 and paragraphs 00380-00382, wherein a non-AP STA sends a Share Offer/Request frame (1512) to an AP indicating an offer/request for shared TXOP access); transmit, via the at least one transceiver, a second frame triggering the shared TXOP (Figure 46 and paragraph 00383, wherein the AP then sends a shareability frame (1518) to other transmitters in the BSS, as well as an AP in a different BSS, triggering the shared TXOP); and communicate, via the at least one transceiver, during the shared TXOP, in accordance with the request (Figure 46 and paragraph 00384, the devices communicate using either NAV (share offer/req) or NAV (OBSS share)). However, while Xia discloses the share offer/request frame does include a duration (Figures 77-78 and paragraphs 00507-00508), Xia does not disclose the request indicates a NAV duration for the NAV setting. In an analogous art, Kim discloses this. Specifically, at Figure 17 and paragraphs 275-276, Kim discloses a TXOP initiation frame (i.e., request frame) send by a non-AP STA that comprises a duration of the obtainable TXOP. This duration field of the TXOP is used by recipients to set NAVs (as described in paragraph 481). Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Xia and Kim. One would have been motivated to do so in order to avoid transmission collisions between stations in a network (refer to paragraphs 126-127 of Kim). Regarding Claim 10, Xia discloses the request includes a field that indicates selection of the NAV setting, from a plurality of NAV settings having different durations (Figures 77-78 and paragraphs 00507-00508, wherein the Share Offer/Request and Share Offer/Request Info frame formats comprise a duration (which can be set to a number of microseconds)). Regarding Claim 13, Xia further discloses the first frame includes a request for the shared TXOP (Figure 46 and paragraphs 00380-00382, wherein a non-AP STA sends a Share Offer/Request frame (1512) to an AP indicating an offer/request for shared TXOP access). Regarding Claim 14, Xia further discloses the request requests that the NAV setting to be applied for just the shared TXOP (Figures 77-78 and paragraphs 00507-00508, wherein the Share Offer/Request and Share Offer/Request Info frame formats comprise a duration of the shared TXOP (which can be set to a number of microseconds)), therefore meeting the claimed alternative limitation. Regarding Claim 15, Xia further discloses the apparatus is configured as an access point (Figure 14 and paragraph 00178). Regarding Claim 20, Xia further discloses the request further includes a request for the shared TXOP (Figure 46 and paragraphs 00380-00382, wherein a non-AP STA sends a Share Offer/Request frame (1512) to an AP indicating an offer/request for shared TXOP access). Claims 4, 11 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xia in view of Kim as applied to Claims 3, 10 and 18 above, and further in view of Xin et al (United States Pre-Grant Publication 2021/0007016), hereinafter Xin. Regarding Claim 4, the combination of Xia and Kim discloses the limitations of Claim 3, as described above. Xia further discloses receiving, via the at least one transceiver, one or more signals after expiration of the NAV associated with a duration (Figure 46, wherein after the NAV periods end, the AP receives further signals (e.g., request 1536)). However, the aforementioned references do not disclose the selected NAV setting has a second duration that is shorter than a first duration, an indicated NAV duration comprises the second duration, and the NAV is associated with the second duration. In an analogous art, Xin discloses this. Specifically, Xin discloses a station sending a CTS either with a short NAV (duration field in the frame to shorten the channel occupancy) (paragraph 0231) or a full NAV (paragraph 0228)). Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Xia / Kim and Xin. One would have been motivated to do so in order to reduce a probability of packet collisions (see paragraph 0008 of Xin). Regarding Claim 11, the combination of Xia and Kim discloses the limitations of Claim 10, as described above. Xia further discloses at least a first duration of the different durations corresponds to a duration of the shared TXOP (Figures 77-78 and paragraphs 00507-00508, wherein the Share Offer/Request and Share Offer/Request Info frame formats comprise a duration (which can be set to a number of microseconds) of the shared TXOP). However, the aforementioned references do not disclose the selected NAV setting has a second duration that is shorter than the first duration, an indicated NAV duration comprises the second duration. In an analogous art, Xin discloses this. Specifically, Xin discloses a station sending a CTS either with a short NAV (duration field in the frame to shorten the channel occupancy) (paragraph 0231) or a full NAV (paragraph 0228)). Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Xia / Kim and Xin. One would have been motivated to do so in order to reduce a probability of packet collisions (see paragraph 0008 of Xin). Regarding Claim 19, the combination of Xia and Kim discloses the limitations of Claim 18, as described above. Xia further discloses receiving, via the at least one transceiver, one or more signals after expiration of the NAV associated with a duration (Figure 46, wherein after the NAV periods end, the AP receives further signals (e.g., request 1536)). However, the aforementioned references do not disclose the selected NAV setting has a second duration that is shorter than a first duration, an indicated NAV duration comprises the second duration. In an analogous art, Xin discloses this. Specifically, Xin discloses a station sending a CTS either with a short NAV (duration field in the frame to shorten the channel occupancy) (paragraph 0231) or a full NAV (paragraph 0228)). Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Xia / Kim and Xin. One would have been motivated to do so in order to reduce a probability of packet collisions (see paragraph 0008 of Xin). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW W. CHRISS whose telephone number is (571)272-1774. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8am-4pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Bates can be reached at (571) 272-3980. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW W CHRISS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2472
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 29, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 18, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593235
ANALYTICS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574793
First Network Node, Second Network Node and Methods in a Wireless Communications Network
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12562805
BEAM MANAGEMENT ENHANCEMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556340
SEPARATE HYBRID AUTOMATIC RECEIPT REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR DOWNLINK TRANSMISSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12507218
CONTROL PLANE MESSAGE FOR SLOT INFORMATION CONVEYANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+24.1%)
4y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 208 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month