Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/316,380

ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 12, 2023
Priority
Oct 25, 2019 — provisional 62/926,035 +12 more
Examiner
CLARK, GREGORY D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1033 granted / 1221 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.6%
+12.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1221 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, because the specification, while being enabling for a limited number of compounds does not reasonably provide a written description for the invention encompassed by the claims. Applicant recites: A compound consisting of a first group and a second group; wherein, each of the first group and the second group independently comprises at least one continuous moiety comprising at least three rings; atoms of the first group do not overlap with atoms of the second group, and no fused ring system is part of both groups; the compound has a highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and a lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO); the second group contains at least 70% of the electron density of the HOMO and at least 70% of the electron density of the LUMO; and the first group is at least 30% deuterated. A compound comprising or consisting of a first group and a second group; wherein each of the first group and the second group independently comprises at least one continuous moiety comprising at least three rings; atoms of the first group do not overlap with atoms of the second group, and no fused ring system is part of both groups; wherein a device lifetime LTI of an OLED in which the compound is used as a host is at least 30% higher than a device lifetime LT2 of a first test OLED in which a first comparative compound is used as a host; wherein the first comparative compound consists of a first group and a second group and has the same chemical structure as the compound except that the first group of the first comparative compound is not deuterated; and wherein the OLED and the first test OLED are different only in deuteration levels of the compound and the first comparative compound. The written description of a compound with a HOMO and LUMO based on a first group and a second wherein both groups comprising at least three rings; atoms of the first group do not overlap with atoms of the second group, and no fused ring system is part of both groups wherein ); the second group contains at least 70% of the electron density of the HOMO and at least 70% of the electron density of the LUMO; and the first group is at least 30% deuterated, does not allow for a determination of the metes and bounds to conduct a comprehensive structure search as said compound is simply defined as a generic material with no limiting chemical features with exception of comprising at least three rings; atoms of the first group do not overlap with atoms of the second group, and no fused ring system is part of both groups wherein. The unlimited scope makes reasonable a structural search very difficult to impossible to establish search parameters fully encompassing the scope of the claims. the first group is a fully deuterated triphenyl silyl (paragraph 026) the second group comprises at least one second moiety selected from the group consisting of carbazole, indolocarbazole, dibenzothiophene, indolodibenzothiophene, dibenzofuran, indolodibenzofuran, dibenzoselenophene, indolodibenzoselenophene, 5,9-dioxa-13b-boranaphtho[3,2,l-de ]anthracene, imidazole, pyridine, pyrimidine, pyrazine, pyridazine, triazine, benzo[d]benzo[4,5]imidazo[l,2-a]imidazole; and azavariants thereof (paragraph 0068) The specification while offering a number of examples is very limited in comparison to the unlimited scope of the claims 1 and 10. claims 1 and 10 lack a defined scope fully supported by a written description commensurate in scope with the claims. The lack of support in the specification for full scope of the claims fails to show that the applicant was in possession of the invention as recited. Therefore, claims 1 and 10 and all claims requiring the limitations claims 1 and 10 are rejected for lacking a suitable written description. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY D CLARK whose telephone number is (571)270-7087. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-4PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Chriss can be reached on 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY D CLARK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703824
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707883
POLYCYCLIC COMPOUND, LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENT INCLUDING THE SAME, AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703711
ORGANIC MOLECULES FOR OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698274
BENZIMIDAZOLE-SUBSTITUTED FLUORANTHENE COMPOUND, AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692279
ORGANIC MOLECULES FOR OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.3%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1221 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month