Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/317,778

CHARGING STATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 15, 2023
Priority
May 17, 2022 — DE 10 2022 112 278.6
Examiner
DIAO, M BAYE
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Audi AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1252 granted / 1431 resolved
+19.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1466
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1431 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Acknowledgement is made of application #18/317,778 filed on 05/15/2023 in which claims 1-10 have been presented for prosecution in a first action on the merits. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) filed on 05/15/2023 and 04/01/2026 have been considered and placed of record. Initialed copies are attached herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-2,8,10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rakuff et al., (Rakuff) US 2021/0086639 in view of Flechl USPAT 11,279,253 B2 (both also cited by Applicants). Regarding claim 1: Rakuff at least discloses and shows in Figs. 1,4 and 11: A charging station(100)(see Fig. 1 and [0023]) for an electric vehicle(4), the charging station(100) comprising: a horizontal boom(construed as extension mechanism 120 since a boom can be an extension unit, arm, legs etc…)(see [0034]) with a charging cable conduit(130) situated at a front side of the charging station at the base of the charging station(see Figs. 10-11), wherein the boom(130) is connected(via charging station housing 104) to the charging station(100)(note- The extension mechanism 120 can be an elongated, flexible structure that is configured to fold upon itself when retracted into the station housing 104 and to unfold and linearly reposition itself horizontally adjacent to the ground surface 6 when extended. The extension mechanism 120 can extend between a proximal end 122 that may be fixed or secured inside the station housing 104 and a distal end 124 that is detached and free to move with respect to the station housing; see [0034] and [0052]) and can swivel to either side and be locked in a desired position(see labels 26 and 27 in Fig. 11). However, Rakuff does not expressly teach the limitations of: wherein the boom is connected by a swivel mechanism to the charging station wherein the boom is connected by a swivel mechanism to the charging station and can swivel using the swivel mechanism horizontally to either side and be locked in a desired position. Flechl discloses factual evidence of the use of a swivel mechanism (construed as arm 6 in combination with mechanism 14 with spindle 15 )(col. 13, lines 1-23; col. 14, lines 33-42)(note-the arm 6 can have both pivot and linear movements). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Flechl’s actuation arm with the boom of Rakuff so as to provide a flexibility and displacement in a multi-direction fashion so as to enable contact between the contacting element and the coupling element, as per the teachings of Flechl (col. 13, lines 34-45). Accordingly claims 1 and 10 would have been obvious. Regarding claim 2, Rakuff in view of Flechl discloses all the claimed invention as set forth and discussed above in claim 1. Rakuff further discloses, wherein the charging cable conduit(134) runs along a longitudinal axis of the boom(130)(see Fig. 4). Regarding claim 8, Rakuff in view of Flechl discloses all the claimed invention as set forth and discussed above in claim 1. Modified Rakuff further discloses, wherein the swivel mechanism(combination of 6,14 and 15) is adapted to lift the boom up from the ground when the swivel mechanism is unlocked, and to lower the boom to the ground when the swivel mechanism is locked(see [0045] and Figs. 7-8)(noted- the limitation of “the swivel mechanism is adapted to lift the boom up from the ground when the swivel mechanism is unlocked, and to lower the boom to the ground when the swivel mechanism is locked” is a functional limitation and the lift mechanism of Rakuff in its normal operating conditions would meet these limitations). Flechl also discloses, wherein the swivel mechanism(combination of 6,14 and 15) is adapted to lift the boom up from the ground when the swivel mechanism is unlocked, and to lower the boom to the ground when the swivel mechanism is locked(see col. 14, lines 6-14). Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rakuff et al., (Rakuff) US 2021/0086639 in view of Flechl USPAT 11,279,253 B2 (both also cited by Applicants) and in further view of CH 715173B1 to Köhler. Regarding claim 9, Rakuff in view of Flechl discloses all the claimed invention as set forth and discussed above in claim 1. However, the combination of Rakuff and Flechl does not disclose the charging station having at least one charging receptacle on the front side of the charging station. In the same filed of endeavor, namely in electric vehicle charging station, Köhler discloses factual evidence of, a charging station 1 has a stationary charging station 2, a control panel 3 mounted in the charging station 2 for the charging station 1, a charging cable 4 mounted in the charging station 2 and a plug receptacle 5(see Köhler; Figs. 1 and 14) mounted in the charging station 2 for a connector connected to the charging cable 4. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to avail of the teachings of Köhler by having the charging station of Rakuff in view of Flechl dispose of at least one charging receptacle on the front side of it in order to enable an extra charging spot for an additional vehicle equipped with a matching male plug. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rakuff et al., (Rakuff) US 2021/0086639 in view of Flechl USPAT 11,279,253 B2 (both also cited by Applicants) in further view of Machida et al., (Machida) JP 2022039185 A. Regarding claim 6, Rakuff in view of Flechl does not expressly teach the limitations of, “wherein the boom is provided with a warning marking”. Machida discloses that operation of the boom 30 is restricted, a warning device for warning the operator OP to confirm the locked state of the safety belt 90 may be provided on the traveling body 10 or the workbench 40. This warning device may emit a warning sound by a speaker or the like, may emit light by a warning light, or may emit a warning by a color or a character by a panel or the like. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to provide the boom of Rakuff as modified by Flechl a warning marking in order to provide safety and protection to both the charging station and the vehicle operator. Allowable Subject Matter . The prior art filed on 05/15/2023 and 04/01/2026 together with art made of record fail to disclose or suggest a charging station and method for operating the same comprising, among other claimed allowable features, As in claim 3: wherein the boom has a movable cover, which is adapted to opening or closing the charging cable conduit. Claims 4-5 depend either directly or indirectly from claim 3 and thus are also allowed for the same reasons. Regarding claim 7, patentability exists at least in part with the claimed limitations of, wherein the swivel mechanism is configured to be locked and unlocked by a foot switch. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Citation of Prior art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. USPATs 9,352,652 ; 9,227,519; 8,487,584; 8,262,,402; 7,804,274; 5,711,558; 5,306,999 and 4,158,802 discloses rechargeable batteries powered electric vehicle and charging station for electric vehicles. KR 102279220 B1 to Kim discloses an electric car charging station. JP 2014033577 A to Sugiura discloses the general state of the art regarding a charging stand. GB 2609408 to Olivier discloses electric vehicle charging station and interface device therefor. GB 2438979 to Calvey et al., (Calvey) discloses the general state of the art regarding a charging station having: an interface for connecting the charging station to a data network, a socket for receiving a plug and a key-operated locking mechanism for locking the plug in said socket. FR 2742250 A1 to Kazdaghli discloses the general state of the art regarding management of electrical supply to electric vehicle recharging stations. US 2010/0013433 A1 to Baxter et al., (Baxter) discloses a vehicle charging station having a dual position locking door. DE 102019109727 A1 to Leidig et al., (Leidig) discloses a charging system for electrical charging of electric vehicles or plug-in hybrid vehicles. CN 102790413 A discloses an electric vehicle charging station. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to M'BAYE DIAO whose telephone number is (571)272-6127. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 10:00AM-6:30PM and OFF most of the time Friday when working IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TAELOR KIM can be reached at 571-270-7166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. M'BAYE DIAO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2859 /M BAYE DIAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 April 13, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 15, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12614909
PREEMPTIVE CHARGING FOR POWER OUTAGE MITIGATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12607683
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING A LOW-PASS FILTER, BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, BATTERY AND VEHICLE
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12609543
BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND OVER-VOLTAGE PROTECTION METHOD THEREOF
2y 12m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12606036
EVSE COUPLER LOCKING SYSTEMS, VEHICLES, AND CONTROL LOGIC FOR MANAGING VEHICLE CHARGING WITH BROKEN COUPLER LATCHES
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12600265
POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, ELECTRIC VEHICLE PROVIDED WITH POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1431 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month