Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/317,859

MULTI-USER ENCODING FOR UNEQUAL MODULATION AND CODING SCHEME ASSIGNMENT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 15, 2023
Examiner
CHASE, SHELLY A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allowance Rate
719 granted / 759 resolved
+34.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
784
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 759 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1 to 21 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 to 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over HU et al. (EP 4 117 220 A1) in view of Huang (USPAP 2023/0413367). Claims 1 to 2 and 7 to 8: HU substantially teaches the claimed invention. HU teaches a method and a communication apparatus for indicating a modulation scheme corresponding to a multi-resource unit and related device, the communication apparatus comprising: one or more access point (Aps) and one or more stations (STAs) (see fig. 1 and par. 0048). HU teaches that the station may support a wired or wireless network and/or extremely high throughput (ETH) or may be a STA applicable to a future Wi-Fi standard (see par. 0054). HU teaches that a resource unit (RU) can be allocated to different users for downlink and uplink data transmission (see par. 0055). HU teaches that RU status may be indicated by a 8-bit resource unit allocation subfield and a user may identify, by reading a station ID in a user field (see par. 0063 to 0064). Hu teaches that a plurality of user fields may indicate a multi-RU (multiple resource unit, MRU) allocated to one communication device (see par. 0068). HU teaches that the MCS of each RU in a combined MRU is an MCS that is set in a user field and the user field corresponding to the first 20MHz bandwidth range includes a STA ID on the STA 2 (see par. 0087). HU teaches that the first device needs to determine whether the first device is a Mu-MIMO and needs to set a quantity of data stream and also determine a quantity of users on a multi-RU (see par. 0101). HU teaches that a quantity of user fields corresponds to the first RU in the plurality of RUs indicated by the RU allocation subfield (see par. 0103). HU teaches that the user field may indicate MCS (modulation and coding scheme) of a plurality of RUs (see par. 0125 et seq.). HU teaches that the communication apparatus includes a processor (1401) may include one or more memories (1402) and the memory may be separately disposed or may be integrated (see fig. 14, and par. 0200). HU teaches that the user field may indicate MCS (modulation and coding scheme) of a plurality of RUs (see par. 0125 et seq.). HU teaches that the communication apparatus includes a processor (1401) may include one or more memories (1402) and the memory may be separately disposed or may be integrated (see fig. 14, and par. 0200). HU fails to specifically teach the limitation of decoding user fields or first portions of unequal modulation and coding scheme (UEM) user fields from a first user specific field” and the limitation of: “decode a second user specific field to retrieve remaining portions of UEM user fields for UEM users for a full set of modulation and coding schemes (MCS);” however. Huang in an analogous art teaches a method and system for uplink multi-user transmission in a wireless local area network comprising the steps of: a STA decoding the received trigger frame to determine whether the RU adaptation is enabled for the STA and the STA further decodes the Common info field of the trigger frame to determine whether the RU adaptation is enabled for the STA. Huang also teaches that further; the STA may decode the Common Info field of the trigger frame to determine that the RU adaptation is disabled for the STA and wherein the Common Info field is set to indicate that the RU adaptation is disabled for all of the plurality of STA’s when Ru or MRU allocated to any of the plurality of STA’s is used for multi-user-input multi-output (MU-MIMO) allocation (see par. 0069). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the communication apparatus of HU to include the decoding step of Huang because Huang teaches that it is known in the art that a STA reception unit includes a decoding unit to determine the RU adaptation that will aid in increasing the system throughput. This modification would have been obvious because a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to employ a method and system for a wireless communication device comprising a decoder in the reception unit for determining the RU adaptation and increasing the system throughput as taught by Huang (see par. 0121). As to the further limitation of the claims, HU teaches that the frame may be extremely high throughput PPDU (EHT-PPDU) according to IEEE 802.11ac/xi Standards (see par. 0034). Huang teaches that the PPDU received and decoded may be according to IEE 802.11ac/xi Standards and Specifications, in a very high throughput (see par. 0004). As per claims 3 to 5, HU teaches that the remaining user fields do not indicate a quantity of users and the remaining user fields are user fields indicating an MCS. HU teaches that the actual quantity of users may alternatively be determined based on a device ID included in a user field corresponding to the multi-RU for the first device (see par. 0110 et seq.). HU teaches that the first RU and the fourth RU are simultaneously allocated to a STA1, a STA2, aSTA3 and aSTA4 as an MRU (see par. 0113). Hu further teaches that a user filed may include the STA ID (see par. 0124). HU teaches that an EHT-sig field comprises a common field and a user specific field wherein the user specific field includes a user field corresponding to the first device (see par. 0061). HU teaches that the common filed includes 1 to N resource units and the resource units includes 1 to m user fields with every two user-field forming a group (see fig. 3 and par. 0061). As per claim 6, HU teaches that the user field in which the first MCS is located is a first user field in a plurality of user fields corresponding to the first device (STA1) (see par. 0097). HU teaches that the user field in which the first MCS is located may include a plurality of MCS and may indicate the plurality of MCS’s in another manner. HU also teaches that the preset sequence may be a descending sequence and may indicate a higher-order modulation scheme (see par. 0129). As per claim 9, HU teaches that all possible resource unit arrangement and combination modes are indicated through indexing and an index may further indicate a quantity of users performing single-user/multi-user multiple-input multiple-output (SU/MU-MIMO) transmission in the RU (see par. 0062). As per claim 10, HU teaches that the communication device comprises a concept of a content channel (CC) based on the IEEE802.11ax standard (see par. 0062). HU teaches that the first preset entry is used at a corresponding MRU in a content channel (see par. 0081) HU further teaches that the content channels may be in ascending sequence of frequencies based a structure of a content channel (see par. 0083). As per claim 11, HU teaches that the resource unit allocation subfield is eight bits and the user field total length is 21 bits (see par. 0126 and 0165). Claims 12 to 13 and 18 to 19: HU teaches a computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer-readable storage medium is executed by a computer, a function of a communication device. HU teaches that a resource unit (RU) can be allocated to different users for downlink and uplink data transmission (see par. 0055). HU teaches that RU status may be indicated by an 8-bit resource unit allocation subfield and a user may identify, by reading a station ID in a user field (see par. 0063 to 0064). Hu teaches that a plurality of user fields may indicate a multi-RU (multiple resource unit, MRU) allocated to one communication device (see par. 0068). HU teaches that the MCS of each RU in a combined MRU is an MCS that is set in a user field and the user field corresponding to the first 20MHz bandwidth range includes a STA ID on the STA 2 (see par. 0087). HU teaches that the first device needs to determine whether the first device is a Mu-MIMO and needs to set a quantity of data stream and also determine a quantity of users on a multi-RU (see par. 0101). HU teaches that a quantity of user fields corresponds to the first RU in the plurality of RUs indicated by the RU allocation subfield (see par. 0103). HU fails to specifically teach the limitation of decoding user fields or first portions of unequal modulation and coding scheme (UEM) user fields from a first user specific field” and the limitation of: “decode a second user specific field to retrieve remaining portions of UEM user fields for UEM users for a full set of modulation and coding schemes (MCS);” however. Huang in an analogous art teaches a method and system for uplink multi-user transmission in a wireless local area network comprising the steps of: a STA decoding the received trigger frame to determine whether the RU adaptation is enabled for the STA and the STA further decodes the Common info field of the trigger frame to determine whether the RU adaptation is enabled for the STA. Huang also teaches that further; the STA may decode the Common Info field of the trigger frame to determine that the RU adaptation is disabled for the STA and wherein the Common Info field is set to indicate that the RU adaptation is disabled for all of the plurality of STA’s when Ru or MRU allocated to any of the plurality of STA’s is used for multi-user-input multi-output (MU-MIMO) allocation (see par. 0069). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the communication apparatus of HU to include the decoding step of Huang because Huang teaches that it is known in the art that a STA reception unit includes a decoding unit to determine the RU adaptation that will aid in increasing the system throughput. This modification would have been obvious because a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to employ a method and system for a wireless communication device comprising a decoder in the reception unit for determining the RU adaptation and increasing the system throughput as taught by Huang (see par. 0121). As per claims 14 to 16, HU teaches that the remaining user fields do not indicate a quantity of users and the remaining user fields are user fields indicating an MCS. HU teaches that the actual quantity of users may alternatively be determined based on a device ID included in a user field corresponding to the multi-RU for the first device (see par. 0110 et seq.). HU teaches that the first RU and the fourth RU are simultaneously allocated to a STA1, a STA2, aSTA3 and aSTA4 as an MRU (see par. 0113). HU further teaches that a user filed may include the STA ID (see par. 0124). HU teaches that an EHT-sig field comprises a common field and a user specific field wherein the user specific field includes a user field corresponding to the first device (see par. 0061). HU teaches that the common filed includes 1 to N resource units and the resource units includes 1 to m user fields with every two user-field forming a group (see fig. 3 and par. 0061). As per claim 17, HU teaches that the user field in which the first MCS is located is a first user field in a plurality of user fields corresponding to the first device (STA1) (see par. 0097). HU teaches that the user field in which the first MCS is located may include a plurality of MCS and may indicate the plurality of MCS’s in another manner. HU also teaches that the preset sequence may be a descending sequence and may indicate a higher-order modulation scheme (see par. 0129). Claims 20 and 21: HU substantially teaches the claimed invention. HU teaches a method and a communication apparatus for indicating a modulation scheme corresponding to a multi-resource unit and related device, the communication apparatus comprising: one or more access point (Aps) and one or more stations (STAs) (see fig. 1 and par. 0048). HU teaches that the station may support a wired or wireless network and/or extremely high throughput (ETH) or may be a STA applicable to a future Wi-Fi standard (see par. 0054). HU teaches that a resource unit (RU) can be allocated to different users for downlink and uplink data transmission (see par. 0055). HU teaches that RU status may be indicated by a 8-bit resource unit allocation subfield and a user may identify, by reading a station ID in a user field (see par. 0063 to 0064). Hu teaches that a plurality of user fields may indicate a multi-RU (multiple resource unit, MRU) allocated to one communication device (see par. 0068). HU teaches that the MCS of each RU in a combined MRU is an MCS that is set in a user field and the user field corresponding to the first 20MHz bandwidth range includes a STA ID on the STA 2 (see par. 0087). HU teaches that the first device needs to determine whether the first device is a Mu-MIMO and needs to set a quantity of data stream and also determine a quantity of users on a multi-RU (see par. 0101). HU teaches that a quantity of user fields corresponds to the first RU in the plurality of RUs indicated by the RU allocation subfield (see par. 0103). HU teaches that the user field may indicate MCS (modulation and coding scheme) of a plurality of RUs (see par. 0125 et seq.). HU teaches that the communication apparatus includes a processor (1401) may include one or more memories (1402) and the memory may be separately disposed or may be integrated (see fig. 14, and par. 0200). HU teaches that the user field may indicate MCS (modulation and coding scheme) of a plurality of RUs (see par. 0125 et seq.). HU teaches that the communication apparatus includes a processor (1401) may include one or more memories (1402) and the memory may be separately disposed or may be integrated (see fig. 14, and par. 0200). HU fails to specifically teach the limitation of decoding user fields or first portions of unequal modulation and coding scheme (UEM) user fields from a first user specific field” and the limitation of: “decode a second user specific field to retrieve remaining portions of UEM user fields for UEM users for a full set of modulation and coding schemes (MCS);” however. Huang in an analogous art teaches a method and system for uplink multi-user transmission in a wireless local area network comprising the steps of: a STA decoding the received trigger frame to determine whether the RU adaptation is enabled for the STA and the STA further decodes the Common info field of the trigger frame to determine whether the RU adaptation is enabled for the STA. Huang also teaches that further; the STA may decode the Common Info field of the trigger frame to determine that the RU adaptation is disabled for the STA and wherein the Common Info field is set to indicate that the RU adaptation is disabled for all of the plurality of STA’s when Ru or MRU allocated to any of the plurality of STA’s is used for multi-user-input multi-output (MU-MIMO) allocation (see par. 0069). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the communication apparatus of HU to include the decoding step of Huang because Huang teaches that it is known in the art that a STA reception unit includes a decoding unit to determine the RU adaptation that will aid in increasing the system throughput. This modification would have been obvious because a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to employ a method and system for a wireless communication device comprising a decoder in the reception unit for determining the RU adaptation and increasing the system throughput as taught by Huang (see par. 0121). As to the further limitation of the claims, HU teaches that the frame may be extremely high throughput PPDU (EHT-PPDU) according to IEEE 802.11ac/xi Standards (see par. 0034). Huang teaches that the PPDU received and decoded may be according to IEE 802.11ac/xi Standards and Specifications, in a very high throughput (see par. 0004). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Liu et al. (USPAP 2019/0238195) discloses a method for group-based unequal MCS schemes. YU et al. (EP 3 934 140 A1) discloses an information indication method and apparatus for a data transmission system. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHELLY A CHASE whose telephone number is (571)272-3816. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 8:00-5:30, 2nd Friday 8:00-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Albert Decady can be reached at 571-272 3819. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Shelly A Chase/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2112
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 10, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12659076
Methods for Rapid Fault Recovery of Corrupted 5G/6G Messages
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12647218
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12647208
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF LOW LATENCY DATA COMMUNICATION FOR PHYSICAL LINK LAYER RELIABILITY
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12647309
PROBABILISTIC CONSTELLATION SHAPING FOR SLOT AGGREGATION
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12640842
COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES APPLYING LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK CODE BASE GRAPH SELECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+2.5%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 759 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month