Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/317,980

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING AND/OR ADAPTING MUSICAL NOTATIONS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 16, 2023
Priority
May 19, 2022 — provisional 63/343,689 +1 more
Examiner
SCHREIBER, CHRISTINA MARIE
Art Unit
2800
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Simply Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
788 granted / 990 resolved
+11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1002
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 990 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 a1 or a2 as being anticipated by Novoa (U.S. Patent Publication 2023/0099808), effectively filed on 9/30/2021, the filing date of the provisional application number 63/250,321. Regarding claim 1, Novoa discloses a method for providing a user with musical notations for playing a musical instrument, the method comprising: receiving source musical notation data descriptive of source musical notation information that can be played with a musical instrument and/or sung by one or more users (figure 1, item 202); analyzing the received source musical notation data for generating a source notation analysis output (is transcribed into a digital score file transcription by a processor, abstract); receiving at least one target requirement defining target musical notation information (one or more target rules, abstract); and providing, based on the source notation analysis output and the at least one target requirement, target musical notation data descriptive of target musical notation information (figure 1, items 106, 108). Regarding claim 2 Novoa discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the providing of target musical notation data includes adapting the source musical notation data to arrive at the target musical notation data (figures 1 and 2 item 108). Regarding claim 3, Novoa discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the providing of target musical notation data includes selecting, based on the source notation analysis output and the at least one target requirement, a set of target musical notation data from a plurality of sets of available target musical notation data (abstract). Regarding claim 4, Novoa discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the source notation analysis output relates to one of the following: identifying one or more instruments that can be engaged for playing the source musical notation information (figure 2, item 112); a source difficulty level of the source musical notation (paragraph 81, to compensate for the difficulty); a source style relating to the source musical notation information (as shown in figures 8A-8C, different instruments); or any combination of the aforesaid. Regarding claim 5, Novoa discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the at least one target requirement of the target musical notation information relates to one of the following: at least one target difficulty level (provided a simplification, figure 2); at least one target style; at least one target musical instrument for playing the target musical notation information (as shown in figures 8a-8c); at least one physiological characteristic of at least one target user playing an instrument according to the target musical information; at least one social characteristic of the at least one target user; or any combination of the aforesaid. Regarding claim 6, Novoa discloses the method of claim 5, wherein the at least one target requirement is used to define one or more of the following musical notation characteristics: scale (figure 6); beats per minute (tempo adjustment, figure 2); time signature (paragraph 64); clefs (paragraph 63); tempo (tempo figure 2); note structure such as note length (as shown in figure4A, item 434), rest lengths (as shown in figure 4A item 430); rhythmic style; and playing setting. Regarding claim 7, Novoa discloses the method of claim 5, wherein the target difficulty level is characterizable by one of the following musical notation characteristics: scale; beats per minute; time signature; clefs; tempo; note structure such as note length, rest lengths; rhythmic style; playing setting, or any combination of the aforesaid. The difficulty may be characterizable by any item shown in figure 2, which overlaps the applicant’s claimed invention. Regarding claim 8, Novoa discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the adapting of the source musical notation data is performed by employing a Machine Learning (ML) Model (machine learning, paragraph 71). Regarding claim 9, Novoa discloses the method of claim 1, comprising displaying information relating to the target musical information data (figures 8A-8D is a display of information relating to the target musical information data based on level). Regarding claim 10, Novoa discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the target musical notation information is a simplified or more complex version of the source musical notation information (multiple levels are provided from level 1 to level 5). Regarding claim 11, Novoa discloses a system for providing a user with musical notations for playing a musical instrument, the system comprising: at least one processor configured to execute computer code instructions stored in the at least one memory (abstract) for performing: receiving source musical notation data descriptive of source musical notation information that can be played with a musical instrument and/or sung by one or more users; analyzing the received source musical notation data for generating a source notation analysis output; receiving at least one target requirement defining target musical notation information; automatically providing, based on the source notation analysis output and the at least one target requirement, target musical notation data descriptive of target musical notation information (method of claim 1, as indicated above). Claims 12-20 are rejected over Novoa for the system of claim 11, performing the method steps of claims 2-10 indicated above, which apply to claim 12- 20. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The examiner points to the references cited in the form 892. The examiner advises the applicant to review these references, because the examiner may apply the references in future actions, if necessitated by amendment. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT W HORN whose telephone number is (571)272-8591. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei Hammond can be reached on 571-270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT W HORN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837 May 5, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2023
Application Filed
May 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Nov 05, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12694857
SELECTIVE TONE SHIFTING DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694856
CONTEXT-AWARE INPUT GESTURES FOR MUSIC CREATION APPLICATIONS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686592
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING LEVELING FAULT OF ELEVATOR
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12682873
DISPLACEMENT SENSOR AND ELECTRONIC MUSICAL INSTRUMENT
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681988
PREDICTION DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 990 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month