Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/318,728

DFB LASER MANUFACTURING METHOD BASED ON DIELECTRIC LATERALLY COUPLED GRATING WITH DETERMINISTIC GRATING COUPLING COEFFICIENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 17, 2023
Priority
Sep 15, 2021 — CN 202111083202.3 +1 more
Examiner
HARVEY, MINSUN OH
Art Unit
2828
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sun Yat-sen University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
16 granted / 19 resolved
+16.2% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
44
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
83.8%
+43.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 19 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 2. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Watanabe et al. (US 20010036213). Regarding claim 1, Watanabe et al. discloses in figure 6 and specification: A DFB laser manufacturing method based on a dielectric laterally coupled grating with a deterministic grating coupling coefficient (see paragraph [0025] and [0036], wherein the DFB laser manufacturing method comprises steps of: S1: performing photolithography (see, paragraph [0044]) on an epitaxial substrate (see, 9, fig. 6, see also, paragraph [0038]) of a laser without an etch-stop layer to obtain a photoresist pattern with a waveguide morphology in a predetermined geometric configuration, and then performing dry etching and removing a photoresist to obtain a substrate of a waveguide structure in the predetermined geometric configuration (see, paragraph [0044]); S2: depositing a layer of an insulating film with a low refractive index on the substrate obtained in the step S1 (see, paragraph [0057], here, first insulators 40a such as SiO.sub.2, refractive index: 1.46); S3: depositing a dielectric film with a high refractive index on the layer of the insulating film (see, paragraph [0059], here, second insulator layer 40c, polyimide, refractive index: 1.58-1.89); S4: performing photolithography on the dielectric film to prepare a photoresist pattern with a laterally coupled grating morphology (see, paragraph [0044], here, by means of the photolithography); S5: performing etching and removing the photoresist for the dielectric film on the photoresist pattern obtained in the step S4 to prepare a dielectric laterally coupled grating for the laser, and using the dielectric laterally coupled grating to prepare a DFB laser (see, paragraph [0061]). PNG media_image1.png 256 384 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Watanabe et al. discloses in figure 6 and specification the DFB laser manufacturing method based on the dielectric laterally coupled grating with the deterministic grating coupling coefficient according to claim 1, wherein the substrate of the waveguide structure in the predetermined geometric configuration obtained in the step S1 by performing dry etching and removing the photoresist is a zero-footing substrate of the waveguide structure with a deterministic geometry size, the predetermined geometric configuration is a positive trapezoid, the waveguide structure for the substrate of the waveguide structure in the predetermined geometric configuration has the positive trapezoid with an inner angle of 60° to 85°, the inner angle being favorable for a footing with a height of less than 100 nm (see, paragraph [0044] and [0045]). Regarding claim 3, Watanabe et al. discloses in figure 6 and specification the DFB laser manufacturing method based on the dielectric laterally coupled grating with the deterministic grating coupling coefficient according to claim 1, wherein a specific process of the step S1 comprises: performing photolithography on the epitaxial substrate of the laser without the etch-stop layer, and obtaining the photoresist pattern with the waveguide morphology in the predetermined geometric configuration by controlling exposure process or post-processing method, and then performing dry etching and removing the photoresist to obtain a zero-footing substrate of the waveguide structure in the predetermined geometric configuration with a determinable size (see, paragraph [0044] and [0045]). Regarding claim 4, Watanabe et al. discloses in figure 6 and specification the DFB laser manufacturing method based on the dielectric laterally coupled grating with the deterministic grating coupling coefficient according to claim 1, wherein the laser epitaxial substrate without the etch-stop layer in the step S1 comprises GaAs-based, GaSb-based and GaN laser materials (see, paragraph [0036]). Regarding claim 5, Watanabe et al. discloses in figure 6 and specification the DFB laser manufacturing method based on the dielectric laterally coupled grating with the deterministic grating coupling coefficient according to claim 1, wherein an angle of the photoresist pattern with the waveguide morphology in the predetermined geometric configuration is ranged from 60° to 80°, and controlling exposure process parameters and post-processing methods comprises exposure dose, developing time, post-baking reflow or plasma dry processing (see, paragraph [0044] and [0045]). Regarding claim 6, Watanabe et al. discloses in figure 6 and specification the DFB laser manufacturing method based on the dielectric laterally coupled grating with the deterministic grating coupling coefficient according to claim 1, wherein, process parameters of the dry etching comprise process gas flow rate, pressure, plasma concentration, bias pressure or sample temperature. (see, paragraph [0052] and [0061]). Regarding claim 7, Watanabe et al. discloses in figure 6 and specification the DFB laser manufacturing method based on the dielectric laterally coupled grating with the deterministic grating coupling coefficient according to claim 1, wherein the insulating film deposited in the step S2 has a thickness of less than 50 nm, the insulating film deposited is a dielectric material with a low refractive index, and the dielectric material with the low refractive index has a refractive index of less than 2 (see, paragraph [0034] and [0064]). Regarding claim 8, Watanabe et al. discloses in figure 6 and specification the DFB laser manufacturing method based on the dielectric laterally coupled grating with the deterministic grating coupling coefficient according to claim 1, wherein the dielectric film deposited in the step S3 has a thickness of less than 300 mm, the deposited dielectric film is a high refractive index dielectric material, and the dielectric material with the high refractive index has a refractive index of greater than 2 (see, paragraph [0034] and [0064]). Regarding claim 9, Watanabe et al. discloses in figure 6 and specification the DFB laser manufacturing method based on the dielectric laterally coupled grating with the deterministic grating coupling coefficient according to claim 1, wherein a grating design in the step S4 comprises correction of a grating period, duty cycle, grating length, and ridge waveguide position grating size, debugging exposure process comprises overall exposure dose debugging and local dose optimization. (see, paragraph [0049]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. 5. Claim 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Watanabe et al., and further in view of MATSUMOT (US 20110229079). Regarding claim 10, Watanabe et al., discloses the limitations of claim 1 for the reasons above. However, Watanabe et al., is silent as to the limitation of “the dielectric laterally coupled grating prepared in the step S5 is a first-order or third-order grating”. MATSUMOT discloses that There is a known method for fabricating a first- order diffraction grating constituting a short-wavelength DFB or DBR semiconductor laser made of a GaAs-based material (see, paragraph [0018]) and . a second-order diffraction grating having a period 2.LAMBDA. on an optical waveguide made of p-AlGaAs (see, paragraph [0019]). Even though MATSUMOT does not disclose that “the limitation of “the dielectric laterally coupled grating prepared in the step S5 is a first-order or third-order grating” as claimed, MATSUMOT discloses the limitation can be realized. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to combine the limitation of “the dielectric laterally coupled grating prepared in the step S5 is a first-order or third-order grating” with a DFB laser manufacturing method of Watanabe et al., because selecting a first-order or third-order grating allows for providing the laser with a different wavelength. Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kinam Park whose telephone number is (571) 270-1738. The examiner can normally be reached on from 9:00 AM-5:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, MINSUN HARVEY, can be reached on (571) 272-1835. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /KINAM PARK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2828
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102, §103
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12627115
SEMICONDUCTOR LASER DRIVE DEVICE, ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR LASER DRIVE DEVICE
4y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12592544
VERTICAL-CAVITY SURFACE-EMITTING LASER (VCSEL) HAVING SEPARATE ELECTRICAL AND OPTICAL CONFINEMENT
3y 8m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586978
APPARATUS FOR AND METHOD OF GENERATING MULTIPLE LASER BEAMS
4y 4m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12525768
EXTERNAL RESONANCE-TYPE LASER MODULE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12520633
SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT EMITTER
3y 9m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.8%)
3y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 19 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month