Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/319,091

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR A PRISMATIC BATTERY CELL ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 17, 2023
Examiner
GATEWOOD, DANIEL S
Art Unit
1729
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
850 granted / 1096 resolved
+12.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
1157
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.7%
+13.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1096 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR A PRISMATIC BATTERY CELL ASSEMBLY DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, Species I, Subspecies Ia (Claims 1-3, 8-10, and 13-16) in the reply filed on 1/22/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-3, 8-10, and 13-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (US 2024/0170811 A1) and further in view of Masumara et al. (US 2020/0274133 A1). Regarding claim 1, Wang et al. a prismatic battery cell assembly (Paragraph 0032 discloses a prismatic battery.), comprising: a prismatic container (Fig. 1, element 115 discloses prismatic housing.), the prismatic container including a body portion composed with plurality of side portions (Paragraph 0031; Fig. 1, element 135 discloses sidewalls.), a bottom portion arranged on a first end of the body portion (Paragraph 0031; Fig. 1, element 130 discloses a second wall, located on the bottom.), and a top portion arranged on a second end of the body portion (Paragraph 0031; Fig. 1, element 125 discloses first wall, located at the top.); a first terminal (Fig. 1, element 105 discloses a first terminal.) and a second terminal (Fig. 1, element 110 discloses a second terminal.); and a plurality of battery cells, the plurality of battery cells being disposed in the prismatic container (Paragraph 0031; Fig. 1, elements 140 and 170.); wherein the plurality of battery cells are arranged in a stack (Paragraph 0031 discloses a stacking arrangement.); wherein each of the plurality of battery cells has a first current collector electrically connected to a first foil and disposed on the first end of the prismatic container (Paragraphs 0039, 0046; Fig. 1 disclose a first tab, element 155 or element 175, which can be connected to a current collector layer, element 150 or 153. Further, paragraphs 0075-0076 disclose the tabs are made of a foil.) ; wherein each of the plurality of battery cells has a second current collector electrically connected to a second foil and disposed on the second end of the prismatic container (Paragraphs 0039, 0046; Fig. 1 disclose a second tab, element 160 or element 180, which can be connected to a current collector layer, element 150 or 153. Further, paragraphs 0075-0076 disclose the tabs are made of a foil. Finally, fig. 1 discloses the second tabs are located at the top or second end.); wherein the second terminal is arranged on the second end (Fig. 1, element 110 discloses the second terminal is located at the top or second end.); wherein a plurality of the second foils are joined to the second terminal (Fig. 1 shows element 180, the foil second tabs, are joined to the second terminal, element 110.). However, Wang et al. do not teach wherein a plurality of the first foils are joined to the prismatic container; and wherein the first terminal comprises the body portion of the prismatic container. Masumara et al. teach a battery comprising a case (Fig. 4, element 11) having a positive terminal (Fig. 4, element 3) and a negative terminal (Fig. 4, element 2). Further, the negative electrode (Fig. 4, element 15) comprises exposed negative electrode current collectors (See annotated Fig. 4 below) which are connected to the negative electrode terminal and the case (Paragraph 0089). In other worse, the case itself, comprising the bottom and side walls, acts as a negative terminal. PNG media_image1.png 1406 2500 media_image1.png Greyscale Fig. 4 of Masumara Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Wang with Masumara in order to prevent the phenomenon in which the external lead for electrically connecting the battery to an external apparatus peels from the electrode terminal. Regarding claim 2, the combination of Wang and Masumara et al. teach the prismatic battery cell assembly of claim 1. Further, Wang et al. teach wherein the second terminal is electrically isolated from the prismatic container (Paragraph 0083; Fig. 1 discloses the second terminal, element 110, can be insulated from the housing, element 115, through the use of insulative members, element 195.). Regarding claim 3, the combination of Wang and Masumara et al. teach the prismatic battery cell assembly of claim 1. Further, Wang et al. teach the plurality of the first foils are joined via welding (Paragraph 0042). However, they do not disclose laser welding. However, laser welding is merely a product by process limitation. MPEP 2113 Product-by-Process Claims I. PRODUCT-BY-PROCESS CLAIMS ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE MANIPULATIONS OF THE RECITED STEPS, ONLY THE STRUCTURE IMPLIED BY THE STEPS "[E]ven though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process." In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695, 698, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985) Regarding claims 8 and 9, the combination of Wang and Masumara et al. teach the prismatic battery cell assembly of claim 1. Further, Wang et al. teach the plurality of the first foils are electrically joined proximal to a first end of the prismatic container (Paragraphs 0039, 0046; Fig. 1 disclose a first tab, element 155 or element 175, which can be connected to a current collector layer, element 150 or 153. Further, paragraphs 0075-0076 disclose the tabs are made of a foil. Finally, fig. 1 shows the foils are at an end of the prismatic container.); and, wherein the plurality of the second foils are electrically joined proximally to a second end of the prismatic container (Paragraphs 0039, 0046; Fig. 1 disclose a second tab, element 160 or element 180, which can be connected to a current collector layer, element 150 or 153. Further, paragraphs 0075-0076 disclose the tabs are made of a foil. Finally, fig. 1 discloses the second tabs are located at and end of the container.). Regarding claim 10, the combination of Wang and Masumara et al. teach the prismatic battery cell assembly of claim 1. Further, Wang et al. teach wherein the prismatic container comprises a rigid walled container that is fabricated from electrically conductive material (Paragraph 0032). Regarding claim 13, Wang et al. a prismatic battery cell assembly (Paragraph 0032 discloses a prismatic battery.), comprising: a prismatic container (Fig. 1, element 115 discloses prismatic housing.), the prismatic container including a body portion composed with plurality of side portions (Paragraph 0031; Fig. 1, element 135 discloses sidewalls.), a bottom portion arranged on a first end of the body portion (Paragraph 0031; Fig. 1, element 130 discloses a second wall, located on the bottom.), and a top portion arranged on a second end of the body portion (Paragraph 0031; Fig. 1, element 125 discloses first wall, located at the top.); a first terminal (Fig. 1, element 105 discloses a first terminal.) and a second terminal (Fig. 1, element 110 discloses a second terminal.); and a plurality of battery cells, the plurality of battery cells being disposed in the prismatic container (Paragraph 0031; Fig. 1, elements 140 and 170.); wherein the plurality of battery cells are arranged in a stack (Paragraph 0031 discloses a stacking arrangement.); wherein each of the plurality of battery cells has a first current collector electrically connected to a first foil and disposed on the first end of the prismatic container (Paragraphs 0039, 0046; Fig. 1 disclose a first tab, element 155 or element 175, which can be connected to a current collector layer, element 150 or 153. Further, paragraphs 0075-0076 disclose the tabs are made of a foil.); wherein each of the plurality of battery cells has a second current collector electrically connected to a second foil and disposed on the second end of the prismatic container (Paragraphs 0039, 0046; Fig. 1 disclose a second tab, element 160 or element 180, which can be connected to a current collector layer, element 150 or 153. Further, paragraphs 0075-0076 disclose the tabs are made of a foil. Finally, fig. 1 discloses the second tabs are located at the top or second end.); wherein the second terminal is arranged on the second end (Fig. 1, element 110 discloses the second terminal is located at the top or second end.); wherein a plurality of the second foils are joined to the second terminal (Fig. 1 shows element 180, the foil second tabs, are joined to the second terminal, element 110.); and wherein the prismatic container comprises a rigid walled container that is fabricated from electrically conductive material (Paragraph 0032). However, Wang et al. do not teach wherein a plurality of the first foils are joined to the prismatic container; and wherein the first terminal comprises the body portion of the prismatic container. Masumara et al. teach a battery comprising a case (Fig. 4, element 11) having a positive terminal (Fig. 4, element 3) and a negative terminal (Fig. 4, element 2). Further, the negative electrode (Fig. 4, element 15) comprises exposed negative electrode current collectors (See annotated Fig. 4 below) which are connected to the negative electrode terminal and the case (Paragraph 0089). In other worse, the case itself, comprising the bottom and side walls, acts as a negative terminal. PNG media_image1.png 1406 2500 media_image1.png Greyscale Fig. 4 of Masumara Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Wang with Masumara in order to prevent the phenomenon in which the external lead for electrically connecting the battery to an external apparatus peels from the electrode terminal. Regarding claim 14, the combination of Wang and Masumara et al. teach the prismatic battery cell assembly of claim 13. Further, Wang et al. teach wherein the second terminal is electrically isolated from the prismatic container (Paragraph 0083; Fig. 1 discloses the second terminal, element 110, can be insulated from the housing, element 115, through the use of insulative members, element 195.). Regarding claim 15, the combination of Wang and Masumara et al. teach the prismatic battery cell assembly of claim 13. Further, Wang et al. teach the plurality of the first foils are joined via welding (Paragraph 0042). However, they do not disclose laser welding, an electrically conductive paste, or solder. However, laser welding is merely a product by process limitation. MPEP 2113 Product-by-Process Claims I. PRODUCT-BY-PROCESS CLAIMS ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE MANIPULATIONS OF THE RECITED STEPS, ONLY THE STRUCTURE IMPLIED BY THE STEPS "[E]ven though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process." In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695, 698, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985) Regarding claim 16 the combination of Wang and Masumara et al. teach the prismatic battery cell assembly of claim 13. Further, Wang et al. teach the plurality of the first foils are electrically joined proximal to a first end of the prismatic container (Paragraphs 0039, 0046; Fig. 1 disclose a first tab, element 155 or element 175, which can be connected to a current collector layer, element 150 or 153. Further, paragraphs 0075-0076 disclose the tabs are made of a foil. Finally, fig. 1 shows the foils are at an end of the prismatic container.); and, wherein the plurality of the second foils are electrically joined proximally to a second end of the prismatic container (Paragraphs 0039, 0046; Fig. 1 disclose a second tab, element 160 or element 180, which can be connected to a current collector layer, element 150 or 153. Further, paragraphs 0075-0076 disclose the tabs are made of a foil. Finally, fig. 1 discloses the second tabs are located at and end of the container.). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL S GATEWOOD whose telephone number is (571)270-7958. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ula Tavares-Crockett can be reached at 571-272-1481. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Daniel S. Gatewood, Ph.D. Primary Examiner Art Unit 1729 /DANIEL S GATEWOOD, Ph. D/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1729 February 9th, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 17, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 27, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 15, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603380
BATTERY PACK INCLUDING HINGED FLAP FOR RELEASE OF VENT GAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597650
PORTABLE POWER SOURCE WITH LOW POWER DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597608
CATION-DISORDERED ROCKSALT TYPE HIGH ENTROPY CATHODE WITH REDUCED SHORT-RANGE ORDER FOR LI-ION BATTERIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597610
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL, AND ELECTROCHEMICAL APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592390
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE PLATE, ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE CONTAINING SAME, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+19.0%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1096 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month