Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/319,698

VEHICLE SEAT FLAP FOR CONCEALING FRAME

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 18, 2023
Examiner
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Lear Corporation
OA Round
4 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
991 granted / 1237 resolved
+28.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1237 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 8-15, 17 and 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gaffney (3250569). Gaffney shows the use of an assembly comprising a trim cover (85) sized to be received on a seat cushion (81), whereby a gap is defined between a bottom front edge of the trim cover and a seat frame (20,22); wherein the seat cushion is movable between an in-use position (lift) in which the gap is defined by a first height (Fig. 2) and a stowed position (Fig. 7) in which the gap is defined by a second height lees than the first height; and a flap (82) comprising an upper edge releasably connected to the trim cover (via the cushion) and a lower edge connectable to the seat frame, the flap is adapted to conceal the gap, wherein: the flap is flexible and such that the flap covers the gap when the seat cushion moves between an in-use position (Fig. 2) and a stowed position, such that the flap is tensioned in the in-use position and is folded in the stowed position (Fig. 5). Regarding claims 8 and 14, the lower edge of the flap comprises a retainer (83) connectable to a flap anchor (bottom surface of the frame). Regarding claims 9-10, the retainer comprises a pair of resilient walls (Fig. 2) defining a cylindrical interior and slot (the bottom opening ) to receive the flap anchor, (as the base panel is inserted in the tubular/cylindrical interior) the retainer extends an entire width of the lower edge of the flap. Regarding claim 17, a frame (19-25) comprises a pair of longitudinal rails (26), a seat pan (21) and a flap anchor (20) disposed below the seat pan, whereby a seat cushion (81) is disposed on the seat pan with a trim cover (85) and a flap (82) formed of elastomeric fibers (see col. 4 line 38). Regarding claim 20, the flap anchor has one end (left side) connected to one of the longitudinal rails and another end (right side) connected to the other rail (Fig. 7) whereby an intermediate portion (the area between the two ends) is connected to the retainer (83) of the flap (as the flap is tubular/cylindrical sleeve that is placed on a bottom of the anchor (Fig. 3)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4-7, 16 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gaffney in view of Bishop (7,628,119). Gaffney shows all of the teachings of the claimed invention except the use of a slide fastener to connect the flap. Bishop teaches the use of a flap is connected to a trim cover by a slide fastener (78), in the form of a zipper. Regarding claims 5-6, Bishop shows a pair of sliders (78,79) in opposite directions (Fig. 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the flap of Gaffney with the slider as taught by Bishop in order to allow for a more secure fit. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 12 and 17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY D BARFIELD whose telephone number is (571)272-6852. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY D BARFIELD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636 adb August 25, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Apr 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 23, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jan 19, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 03, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12728999
PASSENGER SEATING
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722548
BACK SURFACE MEMBER FOR SEAT PAD AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721446
SEATING SYSTEM WITH INDEPENDENT SUSPENSION
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12708218
MODULAR SEAT BOTTOM CUSHION, AND SEAT ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SUCH A CUSHION
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12709925
AIRCRAFT INTERIOR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.9%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1237 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month