Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/319,698

VEHICLE SEAT FLAP FOR CONCEALING FRAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 18, 2023
Examiner
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Lear Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
975 granted / 1218 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1241
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§102
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1218 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Beaty Bishop (7,628,119). Beaty Bishop shows the use of an assembly comprising a trim cover (70) sized to be received on a seat cushion, whereby a gap is defined between a bottom front edge of the trim cover and a seat frame; and a flap (40) comprising an upper edge connected to the trim cover and a lower edge connectable to the seat frame, the flap is adapted to conceal the gap, wherein: the flap is flexible and such that the flap covers the gap when the seat cushion moves between an in-use position (Fig. 2) and a stowed position, such that the flap is tensioned in the in-use position and is folded in the stowed position (Fig. 5). Regarding claims 4-7, the upper edge of the flap is connected to the trim cover by a slide fastener (78), in the form of a zipper and in regards to claims 5-6 a pair of sliders (78,79) in opposite directions (Fig. 2). Regarding claim 8, the lower edge comprises a retainer (67) connectable to a flap anchor. Regarding claim 9, the retainer comprises a pair of resilient walls (65) defining a cylindrical interior and slot to receive the flap anchor, (as the retainer is a rubber tubing forming a loop). Claim(s) 12-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bullard (6,702,378). Bullard shows an assembly comprising a trim cover received on a seat cushion (20), the seat cushion movable between a first position in which a gap below a front bottom edge of the trim cover has a first height (Fig. 2) and a second position in which the gap has a second height (Fig. 4) less than the first height; and a flap comprising an upper edge (indirectly) connected to the trim cover (via a seat frame (22)) and a lower edge connected to a flap anchor (18), the flap is adapted to conceal the gap, wherein the flap is tensioned when in the first position (Fig. 2,7) and is folded (about the skirt bar) when in the second position. Regarding claims 13-14 and 20 the flap anchor is connected to the seat frame that supports the seat cushion and the comprises an elongated member that connects to a retainer (64) on the flap. Regarding claims 15-16, the flap is releasably connected to the trim cover via the seat frame by a slide fastener (56) . Regarding claim 17, Bullard shows the use of a seat cushion (20) disposed on a seat pan (22) and a pair of longitudinal rails (see Fig. 7) and a flap anchor (18) disposed below the seat pan (as shown in Fig. 7). Regarding claim 19, the flap is made from elastomeric fibers (see col. 4 line 9). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Reference Nos, 11,317,723 and 6,871,910 show features of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY D BARFIELD whose telephone number is (571)272-6852. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY D BARFIELD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636 adb March 06, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 18, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jul 23, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 01, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Jan 19, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600480
VEHICLE PASSENGER SEAT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594860
VEHICLE SEAT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594859
VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593921
SEAT SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593918
CROSS-ELASTIC DIRECTOR'S CHAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.9%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month