Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/321,553

LITHIUM COMPOSITE OXIDE AND POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR SECONDARY BATTERY CONTAINING SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 22, 2023
Examiner
SLIFKA, COLIN W
Art Unit
1732
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ecopro Bm Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
578 granted / 871 resolved
+1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
884
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.0%
+13.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 871 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: At line 6 of claim 1, the first comma, between the terms “oxide” and “are” appears to be unnecessary, or rather, improper, to the sentence structure, and should be removed. Appropriate correction is required. This portion of the claim should instead read: “…a part of cations and a part of anions in the lithium nickel-based composite oxide are substituted, respectively, with cations M’ and fluorine anions (F-) in a fluorine-based compound.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, and 10-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fujiwara et al (JP 2000-243394; references made below are with respect to the 29 page English translation, submitted herewith). Regarding claims 1, 11, and 12, Fujiwara teaches a positive electrode for a secondary battery comprising a lithium nickel composite oxide, wherein the positive electrode active material forms secondary particles composed of primary particles (title and abstract). Regarding claim 2 and further regarding claim 1, Fujiwara teaches that in the lithium-nickel composite oxide, nickel is partially replaced with elements including F (par. [0013], page 4/29). Example 6 (pages 14-15) shows the use of lithium fluoride (LiF) in obtaining a final product powder of Li1.05Ni0.95O1.95F0.05. Regarding claim 10, the surface region of both the secondary particles and primary particles of the lithium nickel composite oxide of Fujiwara is considered to comprise an oxide, thus constituting an oxide coating on the particles. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Fujiwara, as discussed above, is considered to represent the closest related prior art to the instantly claimed invention. While Fujiwara clearly teaches the positive electrode active material being in the form of secondary particles composed of primary particles, Fujiwara fails to teach or suggest that the average size of primary particles at the surface portion of the secondary particles is greater than the average size of primary particles at the inside portion of the secondary particle. No such particle primary particle size gradient is taught between the surface and interior of the secondary particles. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COLIN W SLIFKA whose telephone number is (571)270-5830. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00 AM-5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ching-Yiu (Coris) Fung can be reached at 571-270-5713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Colin W. Slifka/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600635
PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR PREPARING GRAPHENE QUANTUM MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600627
Process and Apparatus for Oxygen Injection in a Sulfur Furnace
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595369
ALGAE-RESISTANT BITUMEN-CONTAINING MATERIALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595418
FIBER-CONTAINING FIRE PROTECTION MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586815
SULFIDE-BASED SOLID ELECTROLYTE USED FOR LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY AND PRODUCTION METHOD FOR SAME, SOLID ELECTROLYTE LAYER, AND LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+18.1%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 871 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month