Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/322,103

HEATING CYLINDER HEATER, INJECTION APPARATUS, AND INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 23, 2023
Priority
May 25, 2022 — JP 2022-084919
Examiner
SMITH JR., JIMMY R
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The Japan Steel Works Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
304 granted / 467 resolved
At TC average
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+42.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
496
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 467 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
The arguments and amendments submitted 02/04/2026 have been considered. In light of amendments made, all prior claim objections and USC § 112(b) rejections are hereby withdrawn, unless otherwise listed below. The merits of the claims, however, remain unpatentable as set forth below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. Claims 1, 2, 4-7, 9-12, 13-14, and 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 6, and 13 each recite the following limitations: “wherein the plurality of opening portions penetrate the heat insulating material and communicate with a space surrounded by an inner side of the heat insulating material and an outer circumferential surface of the heating cylinder, such that, when the corresponding opening-closing device opens the at least one opening portion formed at the upper part of the cover, air in the space is allowed to flow out through the at least one opening portion formed at the upper part of the cover, thereby enabling replacement of air in the space and cooling of the heating cylinder, wherein the opening-closing device comprises: a closing member configured to open and close the at least one opening portion". However, Applicant has not pointed out where these new limitations are supported, nor does there appear to be written description of these features anywhere in the disclosure. Therefore, these limitations are unsupported new matter. Dependent claims fall herewith. Claim 12 recites the following limitation: “wherein the opening-closing device comprises: a closing member configured to open and close the at least one opening portion". However, Applicant has not pointed out where these new limitations are supported, nor does there appear to be written description of these features anywhere in the disclosure. Therefore, these limitations are unsupported new matter. Claims 18-20 each recite a new limitation. However, Applicant has not pointed out where this limitation is supported, nor does there appear to be written description of these features anywhere in the disclosure. Therefore, this limitation is unsupported new matter. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 4-5, 9-10, and 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 4-5 and 9-10 each recite "the opening portion". It is unclear whether each of these recitations references a specific opening portion, or each opening portion, or at least one of the opening portions. For the purpose of examination, each of these claims reads on "each opening portion". Claim 16 depends from cancelled claim 15, rendering claim 16 indefinite. Claim 17 depends from cancelled claim 8, rendering claim 17 indefinite. Claim Interpretation The 35 U.S.C. 112(f) invocation for the term opening-closing device in the claims is hereby withdrawn in view of the present amendments to the claims which recites structure for this device. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/04/2026 have been fully considered. The present amendments to claims 1, 6, 12, and 13 overcome the previous 103 rejections over Honsho in view of Wieder. However, the claims are not presently allowable for the reasons described above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIM R SMITH whose telephone number is (303)297-4318. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 9-6 MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JRS/ Examiner Art Unit 1745 /PHILIP C TUCKER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2026
Notice of Allowance

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746567
STAGE AND CURING DEVICE HAVING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747366
PRETREAT COMPOSITIONS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741418
High Speed Light Valve System
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12709091
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE AND WINDOW
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12703150
OPTICAL UNIT AND SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL WORKPIECE
4y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.7%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 467 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month