Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/322,720

ADJUSTABLE PROTECTIVE CAP ARRANGEMENT FOR A BALL JOINT IN A VEHICLE

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
May 24, 2023
Priority
Jun 23, 2022 — EU 22180749.8
Examiner
SAETHER, FLEMMING
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Volvo Truck Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allowance Rate
1067 granted / 1643 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1692
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
65.2%
+25.2% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1643 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 8, the “such as” is indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 6-7, 9 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wright (US 5,205,614). In the embodiment shown in Fig. 6, Wright disclose an adjustable protective cap arrangement comprising: a main part (32) capable of surrounding a ball joint nut (17) having a central through hole to receive a portion of a stud (18); a cap part (26) connected to a smaller diameter end (46) of the main part wherein the cap part is threaded to the main part (at 16) so the axial position of the cap part relative to the main part would be capable of adjustment depending on how far the cap part is threaded onto the main part; and an annular plug-in part (54). The main part includes the thread to be an external thread and the cap part includes the thread to be on an internal surface; the hexagonal shape the cap part is read as a knurl; the plug-in part is a set screw which is receivable in the through hole and is surrounded by the main part with an end read as an internal surfaces with is configured to mate with an external surface of the nut provide an interfacing surface to provide a rotational lock when mated (column 3, lines 59-61). The protective cap is on a vehicle. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wright as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Nason (US 5,028,093). Wright discloses the main part to have the cap part connected at a first end (46), a second end (52) and, an intermediate part between the first and second ends but, does not disclose the second end with a larger diameter flange. Nason discloses a protective cap (10) with a larger diameter flange (24) at a second end. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the protective cap of Wright with a flange at a second end as disclosed in Nason to provide a seal against the wheel as discussed in Nason (column 2, lines 45-47). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 8 appears would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 10-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Cantrell (US 4,784,555), Swinderman (US 9,416,810) and Heintges (US 6,629,810) are cited to teach resilient plug-in parts. Cole (US 1,651,187) is cited to teach a knurl. Nadarajah (US 6,135,691) and Stevens (US 10,655,667) are cited to teach adjustable caps. Camisasca (US 8,051,690), D’Adamo (US 5,752,795) and Parenti (US 9,283,904) are cited to teach screw on caps parts to main parts. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FLEMMING SAETHER whose telephone number is (571)272-7071. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30 - 7:00 eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Mills can be reached at 571-272-8322. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FLEMMING SAETHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638036
FASTENING ASSEMBLY
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631202
FASTENING SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12618429
ECCENTRIC BOLT FOR ATTACHING MISSION POD TO AIRCRAFT
4y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618430
UNITARY PIECE DUAL LOCK SPLIT WASHER
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612936
TWO-PIECE HIGH-STRENGTH SCREW
5y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.4%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1643 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month