Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/323,065

FURNACE BURNER FOR COMBUSTING SOLID PARTICULATE FUEL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 24, 2023
Priority
May 31, 2022 — provisional 63/347,159
Examiner
LAUX, DAVID J
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Heatmaster Furnaces Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
558 granted / 858 resolved
-5.0% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
871
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 858 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Application Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to Applicant’s submission dated 03/02/2026. Claim(s) 1–12 are pending. Election/Restrictions Claim 12 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a non-elected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim at this time. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 03/02/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1–4, 6, & 8–11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2014/0196638 to Pappinen et al. With regard to claim 1, Pappinen discloses a furnace burner for combusting solid particulate fuel (abstract), comprising: a burn chamber (102) arranged for receiving the solid particulate fuel for combustion thereof to generate exhaust gas (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0048–0049); a drum (106) supported in the burn chamber (102) and configured for containing the solid particulate fuel for combustion (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0048–0049), wherein the drum (106) is supported for rotation about a substantially horizontal axis (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0048–0049, 0067); wherein the drum (106) comprises a combustion portion (110) situated inside the burn chamber (102) and configured to support combustion of the fuel therein (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0048–0049) and a drive portion (113) connected to the combustion portion (110) and extending therefrom to an external end disposed outside the burn chamber (102) (Fig. 1; ¶ 0067), wherein the drive portion (113) is arranged for operative coupling to a drive system (113) configured to rotate the drum (106) around the axis (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0048–0049, 0067); wherein the drum (106) extends axially from the external end (Fig. 1), at which the drum (106) is configured to receive the fuel (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0053, 0062), to a downstream end at which the drum (106) is configured to release spent fuel for waste disposal (Fig. 1; ¶ 0062); wherein each of the combustion portion (110) and the drive portion (113) of the drum (106) comprises a tubular peripheral wall (106) encompassing the axis (Fig. 1), wherein the peripheral wall (106) of the combustion portion (110) locates a plurality of openings (140) configured to permit passage of air but not the solid particulate fuel therethrough (Fig. 1; ¶ 0066); and wherein the combustion portion (110) comprises one or more flights (138) disposed on an inner side of the peripheral wall (106) (Fig. 2; ¶¶ 0066, 0072), wherein the one or more flights (138) extend axially and angularly of the drum (106) in a manner conducive of movement of the solid particulate fuel towards the downstream end during rotation of the drum (106) (Fig. 2; ¶ 0072). With regard to claim 2, Pappinen further discloses the openings (140) in the peripheral wall (106) of the combustion portion (110) are distributed across the full circumference thereof (Fig. 1). With regard to claim 3, Pappinen further discloses the peripheral wall (not labeled) of the drive portion (113) is imperforate (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0069–0070). With regard to claim 4, Pappinen further discloses the drive portion (113) is sized diametrically smaller than the combustion portion (110) (Fig. 1). With regard to claim 6, Pappinen further discloses the drum (106) is rotatably supported at or adjacent each of the external and downstream ends and is free of rotational support therebetween (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0048–0049, 0067). With regard to claim 8, Pappinen further discloses the drive portion (113) of the drum (106) is received in a bushing (124a, 124b, 124c) supported by the burn chamber (102) (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0050, 0070). With regard to claim 9, Pappinen further discloses in combination with a fuel feeding system (116) including a screw conveyor in coaxial alignment with the drum (106) (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0049, 0052–0053), and the screw conveyor (116) comprises helical flighting (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0049, 0052–0053), wherein the helical flighting extends into the drive portion (Fig. 1; ¶¶ 0049, 0052–0053). With regard to claim 10, Pappinen further discloses the burn chamber (102) is configured to provide an air gap (108) around a full circumference of the drum (106) (Fig. 1; ¶ 0048). With regard to claim 11, Pappinen further discloses the peripheral wall (106) of the combustion portion (110) comprises an outer metallic wall and an inner wall of refractory material (¶¶ 0017, 0063), wherein the inner wall of refractory material comprises a plurality of axially-extending sections arranged side-by-side in a circumferential direction of the drum (106) (Fig. 1; “section” has been interpreted to mean “zone, area, portion” which is an arbitrary demarcation). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pappinen. Pappinen further discloses the drive portion (113) is circular cylindrical in shape (Fig. 1). Pappinen fails to disclose the combustion portion is polygonally cylindrical in shape. It would have been an obvious matter of design choice to use a combustion portion that is polygonally cylindrical in shape, since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the shape of a component. A change in shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art when the choice of shape has no significant impact on the operation of the invention. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pappinen in view of US 3,513,788 to Ostrin. Pappinen fails to disclose the combustion portion is polygonally cylindrical in shape. It would have been an obvious matter of design choice to use a combustion portion that is polygonally cylindrical in shape, since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the shape of a component. A change in shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art when the choice of shape has no significant impact on the operation of the invention. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Pappinen also fails to disclose the drum comprises one or more outwardly projecting annular flanges supported on an outer side the peripheral wall of the combustion portion at or adjacent the downstream end of the drum, and the furnace burner further includes a plurality of rollers rotatably supported in the burn chamber and arranged for rolling engagement with the one or more annular flanges at circumferentially spaced positions of the drum. Ostrin teaches the drum (2) comprises one or more outwardly projecting annular flanges (5) supported on an outer side the peripheral wall of the combustion portion at or adjacent the downstream end of the drum (2) (Fig. 1; ), and the furnace burner further includes a plurality of rollers (4) rotatably supported in the burn chamber and arranged for rolling engagement with the one or more annular flanges (5) at circumferentially spaced positions of the drum (2) (Fig. 1; Col. 2, lines 46–61). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the furnace burner of Pappinen with the drum rollers of Ostrin because such a combination would have had the added benefit of providing mechanical support for the drum across its length. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: see attached PTO-892. Applicant is encouraged to review the cited references prior to submitting a response to this office action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID J LAUX whose telephone number is (571)270-7619. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Helena Kosanovic can be reached at (571) 272-9059. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID J LAUX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3762 September 17, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742282
Dryer duct sensing and cleaning
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736220
Thermal Processing Apparatus with a Heating Device Operated with Hydrogen, Sustainable Cremation, Free of CO2
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736221
SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION CATALYST MODULE SUPPORT SYSTEM AND INSTALLATION METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729910
METHOD FOR DRYING A MATERIAL FOR IRRADIATION, AND INFRARED IRRADIATION DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT SAID METHOD
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729849
NOZZLE TIP FOR A SOLID FUEL BURNER
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.3%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 858 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month