Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/324,539

TRIMMERS AND AUTO ADVANCING TRIMMER LINES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 26, 2023
Examiner
LEE, LAURA MICHELLE
Art Unit
3724
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allow Rate
536 granted / 978 resolved
-15.2% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1021
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 978 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/06/2026 has been entered. Claims 1-6, 10-16, and 20 are currently pending and claims 1, 11 and 20 are currently amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 10, 11 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kullberg (U.S. Publication 2021/0037704). In regards to claim 1, Kullberg discloses a trimmer comprising: a motor (4); a trimmer head (trimmer head 1) disposed on a connecting member (pole 6) and including a trimmer line spool (spool 5); a user interface (one or more buttons 12) disposed on the connecting member (6), wherein the user interface is configured to operate the trimmer head; a sensor (sensor) configured to determine a length of a trimmer line (3) extending from the trimmer head “As an alternative, or in addition, the trimmer 13 may comprise a sensor configured to detect a length of the trimmer line 3, wherein the trimmer 13 is configured to initiate feed of trimmer line 3 when the length is below a threshold value” paragraph [0063]) wherein the trimmer line (3) is disposed on the trimmer line spool (5); and, an auto advance mechanism (“wherein the trimmer 13 is configured to initiate feed of trimmer line 3” paragraph [0063]) configured to extend the trimmer line extending from the trimmer head based on feedback from the sensor (inherent from paragraph [0063]); wherein the auto advance mechanism comprises a centrifugal clutch (39) operably connected to the trimmer line spool (5); wherein the centrifugal clutch is in an operable connection with the motor (4) of the trimmer to selectively engage the trimmer line spool to advance the trimmer line based on a rotational speed of the centrifugal clutch; and wherein the motor (4) causes the centrifugal clutch to rotate past a threshold speed (“by accelerating, or decelerating, the trimmer head 1 at a higher rate than during normal operation”; paragraph [0063]) when the length of the trimmer line falls below a predetermined threshold value to advance the trimmer line to a desired length (“to initiate feed of trimmer line” paragraph [0063]), and wherein the motor reduces the rotational speed of the centrifugal clutch below the threshold speed when the trimmer line advances to the desired length. (“If the trimmer head 1 is rotating at a rotational speed below the threshold rotational speed, and trimmer head 1 is subjected to a change in rotational speed via the interface 2 at a higher rate than the threshold rate, no trimmer line will be fed because the inner body 1c is free to rotate relative the spring holding member 38. Thus, due to the centrifugal clutch 39, the automatic feed mechanism 7 will release the trimmer line when the trimmer head 1 rotates at rotational speed above the threshold rotational speed and when the trimmer head 1 is subjected to a change in rotational speed, via the interface 2, at a higher rate than the threshold rate. Thereby, an unintended release of trimmer line can be avoided at lower rotational speeds.”; paragraph [0072] In regards to claim 10, the modified device of Kullberg discloses wherein the auto advance mechanism automatically extends the trimmer line (45) when the length falls below a predetermined threshold value. “As an alternative, or in addition, the trimmer 13 may comprise a sensor configured to detect a length of the trimmer line 3, wherein the trimmer 13 is configured to initiate feed of trimmer line 3 when the length is below a threshold value” paragraph [0063]) In regards to claim 11, Kullberg discloses a method for auto advancing a trimmer line of a trimmer, the method comprising: determining a length of the trimmer line (3) extending from a trimmer head (1) and disposed on a trimmer line spool (“the trimmer 13 may comprise a sensor configured to detect a length of the trimmer line 3” paragraph [0063]); comparing the length to a predetermined threshold value (“wherein the trimmer 13 is configured to initiate feed of trimmer line 3 when the length is below a threshold value” paragraph [0063]); and, automatically advancing the trimmer line if the length falls below the predetermined threshold value (“configured to initiate feed of trimmer line 3 when the length is below a threshold value” paragraph [0063]); wherein automatically advancing the trimmer line (3) comprises selectively engaging the trimmer line spool with a centrifugal clutch (39) operably coupled to a motor (4) of the trimmer to advance the trimmer line based on a rotational speed of the centrifugal clutch (see paragraphs 0063; 0072-0073); and wherein the motor (4) causes the centrifugal clutch (39) to rotate past a threshold speed (“by accelerating, or decelerating, the trimmer head 1 at a higher rate than during normal operation”; paragraph [0063]) when the length of the trimmer line falls below a predetermined threshold value to advance the trimmer line to a desired length (“to initiate feed of trimmer line” paragraph [0063]), and wherein the motor reduces the rotational speed of the centrifugal clutch below the threshold speed when the trimmer line advances to the desired length. (“If the trimmer head 1 is rotating at a rotational speed below the threshold rotational speed, and trimmer head 1 is subjected to a change in rotational speed via the interface 2 at a higher rate than the threshold rate, no trimmer line will be fed because the inner body 1c is free to rotate relative the spring holding member 38. Thus, due to the centrifugal clutch 39, the automatic feed mechanism 7 will release the trimmer line when the trimmer head 1 rotates at rotational speed above the threshold rotational speed and when the trimmer head 1 is subjected to a change in rotational speed, via the interface 2, at a higher rate than the threshold rate. Thereby, an unintended release of trimmer line can be avoided at lower rotational speeds.”; paragraph [0072] In regards to claim 20, Kullberg discloses wherein: when the motor (4) causes the centrifugal clutch (39) to rotate past a threshold speed, the centrifugal clutch (39) engages the trimmer line spool (via locking device 46) such that it rotates and advances the trimmer line (see paragraphs 0063 and 0072-0073 reproduced below); and when the motor (4) reduces the rotational speed of the centrifugal clutch (39) below the threshold speed, the centrifugal clutch disengages the trimmer line spool such that the trimmer line spool no longer rotates to advance the trimmer line (see paragraphs [0072-73 reproduced below) (“the automatic feed mechanism 7 will perform a release of trimmer line when the trimmer head 1 is subjected to a rate of change in rotational speed, via the interface 2, at a higher rate than what is obtained during normal operation of a trimmer. The trimmer 13 illustrated in FIG. 1, may be configured to initiate a feed of trimmer line 3 by accelerating, or decelerating, the trimmer head 1 at a higher rate than during normal operation.” Paragraph [0063] (“If the trimmer head 1 is subjected to a change in rotational speed, via the interface 2, at a higher rate than the threshold rate, for example an abrupt deceleration, the inner body 1c and the spring holding member 38 will rotate relative the housing 1a, 1b. As a result, the locking lever 23 moves from the first radial position to the second radial position, and the trimmer line spool 5′ is free to rotate. If the trimmer head 1 is rotating at a rotational speed below the threshold rotational speed, and trimmer head 1 is subjected to a change in rotational speed via the interface 2 at a higher rate than the threshold rate, no trimmer line will be fed because the inner body 1c is free to rotate relative the spring holding member 38.” paragraphs [see paragraphs 0072-0073]) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-5, 12-13, and 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kullberg (U.S. Publication 2021/0037704) in view of Zha et al. (U.S. Publication 2019/0269070), herein referred to as Zha. In regards to claim 2 and 12, the modified device of Kullberg discloses a trimmer including a sensor configured to detect when the trimmer line falls below a threshold value so that the length of the trimmer line can be automatically increased. However, Kullberg does not disclose the specific type of sensor such that it is a draw sensor or a Hall sensor or the location of the sensor to perform this detection. Zha teaches a string trimmer with a release mechanism capable of releasing the trimmer line to increase the trimmer line extending out of the spool and further discloses a calculation unit configured to determine to calculate usage and the remaining amount of trimmer line. Zha further teaches that the smart release mechanism includes a detection module and a controller, wherein the detection module may include a Hall sensor, a color recognition sensor or vibration sensor. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to employ one of the sensors taught by Zha, such as a Hall sensor, color recognition sensors, or vibration sensor, in the trimmer of Kullberg in order to detect when the trimmer line falls below the threshold value. In regards to claims 3 and 13, the modified device of Kullberg discloses wherein the sensor comprises a Hall sensor (Zha paragraph [0063,0068]) In regards to claims 4 and 15, the modified device of Kullberg discloses wherein the Hall sensor is disposed on a guard at least partially enclosing the trimmer head ( as modified by Zha “a Hall sensor is disposed on the line container” Zha paragraph [0063]). In regards to claim 5 and 16, the modified device of Kullberg discloses wherein the Hall sensor is disposed on a cutter (as modified by Zha; “a Hall sensor is disposed on the line container and detects the magnetism of the trimmer line” Zha paragraph [0063,0068]). Claim 6 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kullberg (U.S. Publication 2021/0037704) in view of Zha et al. (U.S. Publication 2019/0269070), herein referred to as Zha and in further view of Legrand (U.S. Patent 6,630,226). In regards to claim 6 and 14, the modified device of Kullberg does not disclose wherein the trimmer line comprises ferrous particles embedded in a plastic line. Attention is further directed to the Legrand, which discloses a trimmer cutting line including a monofilament core coated with a granular layer comprising inorganic particles. Legrand further teaches that the coating may include metallic particles such as zinc, iron or aluminum. The compotes cutting line is disclosed as providing improved cutting performance, reduced operating nose, and breakage at the eyelet of the rotary head (see abstract). As Legrand teaches incorporating metallic particles including iron particles on the cutting line to improve cutting performance and operating characteristics, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to incorporate ferrous particles in the plastic trimmer line of Kullberg in order to achieve the known benefits of improved cutting performance, reduced noise, and improved durability. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAURA M LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-8339. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8a.m.- 5p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Boyer Ashley can be reached at 571-272-4502. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAURA M LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jun 30, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 02, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600049
RAZOR CARTRIDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12558808
BLADE ASSEMBLY AND RETRACTION MECHANISM FOR A HIGH-SPEED FOOD SLICING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552057
METHODS OF MANUFACTURING A HAIR TRIMMER ATTACHMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544943
BLADE SET, HAIR CUTTING APPLIANCE, AND RELATED MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539630
Electric Shaver, Handheld Household Electrical Appliance, Electric Shaver System, And Control Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+30.7%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 978 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month