Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/324,542

SWITCHABLE ANTENNA ASSEMBLIES FOR OMNI-DIRECTIONAL 6E WIFI SIGNALING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 26, 2023
Priority
May 31, 2022 — provisional 63/347,316
Examiner
KARACSONY, ROBERT
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kyocera Avx Components (San Diego) Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
713 granted / 926 resolved
+9.0% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
943
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 926 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on April 29, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 7, 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iellici (U.S. Patent No. 10,305,182) in view of Eslami (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0036424). Claim 1: Iellici, in figures 24 and 25 discloses a switchable antenna assembly (240), the switchable antenna assembly comprising: a substrate (PCB, col. 9, lns. 17-30); a ground plane disposed on the substrate; a feed (26); a first planar antenna element (A) extending from the ground plane in a first direction, wherein the first planar antenna element is coupled to the feed by a first transmission line, wherein the first planar antenna element is configured to produce a first radiation pattern (330A, fig. 33); a second planar antenna (B) element extending from the ground plane in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction of first planar antenna element, wherein the second planar antenna element is configured to produce a second radiation pattern (330B, fig. 33); and a single pole—two-throw switching element (RF switch, col. 9, lns. 17-30) configured to selectively couple one of the first transmission line or the second transmission line to the feed; wherein the two-throw switching element is posited atop the first and second transmission lines (figs. 24 and 25). Iellici fails to disclose a switchable antenna assembly further comprising a data over coaxial circuit configured to concurrently carry a radio frequency signal and a control signal; a radio frequency circuit configured to demodulate the control signal from the radio frequency signal; controlling the switching element based at least in part on the demodulated control signal. However, Eslami, in fig. 2, discloses the technique of using a data over coaxial circuit (114) configured to concurrently carry a radio frequency signal and a control signal; a radio frequency circuit (112) configured to demodulate the control signal from the radio frequency signal. The courts have held that the simple substitution of one known element for another to obtain predictable results is considered obvious. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have substituted the control signal technique used in the invention of Iellici with the technique taught by Eslami, in order to have provided the predictable result of controlling the switching element. The modified invention of Iellici in view of Eslami would have yielded controlling the switching element based at least in part on the demodulated control signal. Claim 2: Iellici discloses wherein the first planar antenna element and the second planar antenna element are configured to produce a signal between about 5 GHz and about 7.2 GHz (col. 7, lns. 48-51). Claim 3: The modified invention of Iellici in view of Eslami discloses wherein the two-throw switching element is controlled via a control circuit (118, fig. 2, Eslami). Claim 7: The modified invention of Iellici in view of Eslami discloses wherein the radio frequency signal is defined within a first frequency band, and the control signal is defined within a second frequency band that is distinct from the first frequency band (¶[0051], Eslami). Claim 9: Iellici discloses wherein the first radiation pattern is associated with a first polarization, the second radiation pattern is associated with a second polarization, the first polarization being different from the second polarization (fig. 33). Claim 10: Iellici discloses wherein the first planar antenna element defines a first shape, and wherein the second planar antenna element defines a second shape identical to the first shape (fig. 25). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 11 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iellici (U.S. Patent No. 10,305,182) in view Eslami (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0036424), and further in view of ZARIC (U.S. Publication No. 2019/0044231). Claims 11 and 12: Iellici fails to disclose wherein the first shape of the first planar antenna element comprises: a straight first edge; a straight second edge parallel to the first edge; a straight third edge, wherein a first endpoint of the third edge contacts a first endpoint of the first edge and a second endpoint of the third edge contacts a first endpoint of the second edge; and a curved fourth edge, wherein a first endpoint of the fourth edge contacts a second endpoint of the first edge and a second endpoint of the fourth edge contacts a second endpoint of the second edge; and wherein the switchable antenna assembly is configured for 6e Wifi signaling. ZARIC discloses an UWB antenna capable of operating at 6E Wifi signaling (para. [0003]); and comprising a planar antenna element shape that comprises: a straight first edge; a straight second edge parallel to the first edge; a straight third edge, wherein a first endpoint of the third edge contacts a first endpoint of the first edge and a second endpoint of the third edge contacts a first endpoint of the second edge; and a curved fourth edge, wherein a first endpoint of the fourth edge contacts a second endpoint of the first edge and a second endpoint of the fourth edge contacts a second endpoint of the second edge (fig. 3E). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified the invention of Iellici, and replaced the antennas of Iellici with the UWB antennas disclosed by ZARIC. Doing so would have enabled the device with ultrawideband wireless communication. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-3, 7 and 9-12 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT KARACSONY whose telephone number is (571)270-1268. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dimary Lopez can be reached at (571) 270-7893. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Robert Karacsony/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 21, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700659
TRANSPARENT ANTENNA AND ACTIVE DIMMING LAYER
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700663
BASE STATION ANTENNAS HAVING AN ACTIVE ANTENNA MODULE AND RELATED DEVICES AND METHODS
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700664
ANTENNAS FOR ARTIFICIAL REALITY SYSTEMS
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700662
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695213
AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE RANGING SYSTEM WITH POLARIZED ANTENNA
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+15.1%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 926 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month