Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/324,993

METHOD, SYSTEM, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR CONTROLLING A ROBOTIC GARDEN TOOL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 28, 2023
Priority
Dec 30, 2020 — CN 202023283031.2 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, BAO LONG T
Art Unit
3656
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Greenworks (Jiangsu) Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
461 granted / 557 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
571
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
76.5%
+36.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 557 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This is a final office action on the merits in response to communications on 6/5/2025. Claims 2, 4, 7, 14 are cancelled. Claims 1, 3, 5-6, 8-13, 15 are pending and addressed below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 12, 13, see starting page 11 of REMARKS, have been considered but are moot because of new amendments thus the arguments do not apply to current rejections. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3, 5-6, 8-11, 12, 13 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "said steps" in line 33. It is not clear what steps this is referring to. Note the only previous introduction of “the steps” is in line 4, and this includes all steps after line 4. However, at line 33, not all steps of this claim have been introduced yet, so it is not clear if “said steps” in line 33 is referring to all steps from line 4 to line 33, or all steps from line 4 to the end of claim 1, or some other combination of steps. Claims 3, 5-6, 8-11 depend on this claim and suffer from the same issues. Claim 12 recites the limitation "said steps" in line 32. It is not clear what steps this is referring to. In addition, there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 13 recites the limitation "said steps" in line 35. It is not clear what steps this is referring to. In addition, there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. All dependent claims of these claims are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, by virtue of their dependency. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 15 allowed. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAO LONG T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7768. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khoi Tran can be reached at (571) 272-6919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BAO LONG T. NGUYEN Examiner Art Unit 3664 /BAO LONG T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3656
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 05, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 31, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678941
SIMULATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675145
ACTIVE THERMAL CONTROL FOR A SYSTEM ON A CHIP (SOC)
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673413
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TEACHING OF LOCATIONS IN LABORATORY AUTOMATION EQUIPMENT
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12653365
ROBOT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ROBOT
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654308
EXOSKELETON DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.4%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 557 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month