Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/326,612

CATALYTIC HEATING SYSTEMS WITH SELF-HEATED CATALYTIC REACTORS AND METHODS OF OPERATING THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 31, 2023
Examiner
EDWARDS, LOREN C
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Proof Energy Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
535 granted / 655 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
689
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 655 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Response to Amendment The Preliminary Amendment filed 5/31/23 has been entered. Claims 19-20, 22-24, and 26-30 have been canceled. Claims 1-18, 21, and 25 remain pending in the application. Claim Objections Claim 18 is objected to because “the form of” in line 4 should be --a form of--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8, 12-18, 21, and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Rostrup-Nielsen et al. (U.S. 6,109,018). PNG media_image1.png 727 579 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 560 654 media_image2.png Greyscale Re claim 1: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses a self-heated catalytic reactor (10, electrically-heated catalyst combustion unit - Col. 4, Lines 64-66) comprising: a conductive layer (12, corrugated foil - Col. 6, Line 8; 14, flat foil - Col. 6, Line 8 (see Col. 7, Lines 28-40)) comprising a first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a type of first end (see also Fig. 1a))) and a second end (Modified Fig. 6 above - B (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element B as a type of second end (see also Fig. 1a))), opposite of the first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A)(see Fig. 1a and Modified Fig. 6 above), wherein the first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A) and the second end (Modified Fig. 6 above - B) define a length of the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 1a and Modified Fig. 6 above); an insulator layer (72, dielectric - Col. 11, Line 65) forming a stack (Modified Fig. 7 above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a type of stack)) together with the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 7 (also Figs. 1a and 6)), wherein each pair of adjacent layers of the conductive layer (12, 14) in the stack is separated by the insulator layer (72)(see Fig. 7), and a catalyst layer (74, washcoat layer - Col. 12, Line 3) positioned on and supported on at least the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 7 and Col. 12, Lines 21-25); a first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”) electrically coupled to the conductive layer (12, 14) at the first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A)(see Modified Fig. 6 above and Col. 8, Lines 1-7); and a second electrode (see Fig. 6 at “ELECTRODES”) electrically coupled to the conductive layer (12, 14) at the second end (Modified Fig. 6 above - B)(see Modified Fig. 6 above and Col. 8, Lines 1-7). Re claim 2: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), wherein the stack (Modified Fig. 7 above - A) is a wound stack (see Modified Fig. 7 above at A, Fig. 6, and Col. 6, Lines 9-16) forming a coil around the first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”)(see Modified Fig. 7 above and Fig. 6). Re claim 3: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 2 (as described above), wherein the stack is a single-coil wound stack (see Modified Fig. 7 above at A, Fig. 6, and Col. 6, Lines 9-16) with the first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”) at least partially extending through a center of the stack (see Modified Fig. 7 above, Fig. 6, and Col. 10, Line 63 - Col. 11, Line 15). Re claim 4: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 3 (as described above), wherein the insulator layer (72) is a single layer (see Fig. 7 at 72) positioned on one side (Modified Fig. 7 above - B (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element B as a type of one side of element 12, 14)) of the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Modified Fig. 7 above). Re claim 7: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), wherein the stack (Modified Fig. 7 above - A) is an accordion-style stack (see Modified Fig. 7 above at elements A and 12 (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize a type of accordion-style stack is shown at element A by depicted structure of element 12)). Re claim 8: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 7 (as described above), wherein the insulator layer (72) comprises multiple patches (Modified Fig. 7 above - D, E (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize elements D and E as a type of patch of element 72)) positioned on different sides (Modified Fig. 7 above - B, C (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize elements B, C as different sides of element 12)) of the conductive layer (12, 14) such that the patches (Modified Fig. 7 above - D) on a first side (Modified Fig. 7 above - B (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element B as a type of first side of element 12)) of the conductive layer (12, 14) are offset relative to the patches (Modified Fig. 7 above - E) on a second side (Modified Fig. 7 above - C (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element C as a type of second side of element 12)), opposite of the first side (Modified Fig. 7 above - B)(see Modified Fig. 7 above). Re claim 12: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), wherein the catalyst layer (74) is positioned on and supported by each of the conductive layer (12, 14) and the insulator layer (72)(see Fig. 7). Re claim 13: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), wherein the conductive layer (12, 14) is formed from at least one of stainless steel, superalloy (INCONEL®), a FeCrAI alloy, and a conductive ceramic (Col. 7, Lines 28-40). Re claim 14: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), wherein the conductive layer (12, 14) is configured to withstand a temperature of at least 1000°C (Col. 14, Lines 11-18 (see Also Col. 7, Lines 28-32)). Re claim 15: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), wherein the conductive layer (12, 14) has a resistance of between 0.05 Ohm to 100 Ohm (Col. 10, Lines 44-62 (including Table 2 where resistance values are shown)). Re claim 16: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), wherein the conductive layer (12, 14) has a thickness of between 20 micrometers and 400 micrometers (see Col. 17, Line 43 and Col. 17, Lines 60-61). Re claim 17: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), wherein the conductive layer (12, 14) is a corrugated conductive layer (see Fig. 7 and Col. 6, Line 8). Re claim 18: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), wherein: the insulator layer (72) is formed from at least one of ceramic, glass, mica, and a combination thereof (Col. 12, Lines 32-42 (zirconium oxide is a ceramic)); and the insulator layer (72) is in the form of a sheet, a cloth, a screen, or a mat (see Fig. 7 at element 72 and Col. 12, Lines 21-25 and Col. 12, Lines 32-42 (element 72 is shown/described with a structure of a type of sheet)). Re claim 21: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses a catalytic heating system (Figs. 9a-9b) using fuel (see Fig. 9a at “FUEL”) and oxidant (see Fig. 9a at “AIR”) to generate heat (see Fig. 9a and Col. 14, Line 47-59), the catalytic heating system comprising: a self-heated catalytic reactor (10, electrically-heated catalyst combustion unit - Col. 4, Lines 64-66) comprises a conductive layer (12, corrugated foil - Col. 6, Line 8; 14, flat foil - Col. 6, Line 8 (see Col. 7, Lines 28-40)), an insulator layer (72, dielectric - Col. 11, Line 65), a catalyst layer (74, washcoat layer - Col. 12, Line 3), a first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”), and a second electrode (see Fig. 6 at “ELECTRODES”), wherein: the conductive layer (12, 14) comprises a first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a type of first end (see also Fig. 1a))) and a second end (Modified Fig. 6 above - B (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element B as a type of second end (see also Fig. 1a))), opposite of the first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A)(see Fig. 1a and Modified Fig. 6 above), wherein the first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A) and the second end (Modified Fig. 6 above - B) define a length of the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 1a and Modified Fig. 6 above), the insulator layer (72) forms a stack (Modified Fig. 7 above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a type of stack)) together with the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 7 (also Figs. 1a and 6)), wherein each pair of adjacent layers of the conductive layer (12, 14) in the stack is separated by the insulator layer (72)(see Fig. 7), the catalyst layer (74) is positioned on and supported on at least the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 7 and Col. 12, Lines 21-25), the first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”) is electrically coupled to the conductive layer (12, 14) at the first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A)(see Modified Fig. 6 above and Col. 8, Lines 1-7), and the second electrode (see Fig. 6 at “ELECTRODES”) is electrically coupled to the conductive layer (12, 14) at the second end (Modified Fig. 6 above - B)(see Modified Fig. 6 above and Col. 8, Lines 1-7); a power supply (52, power controller - Col. 15, Line 22 (element 52 corresponds to “VOLTAGE SOURCE” depicted in Fig. 6)) electrically coupled to the first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”) and the second electrode (see Fig. 6 at “ELECTRODES”) of the self-heated catalytic reactor (10)(see Figs. 6, 9a-9b, and Col. 15, Lines 20-25); a thermocouple (90, thermocouples - Col. 15, Lines 10-11) configured to measure temperature in the catalytic heating system (Figs. 9a-9b) corresponding to temperature of the self-heated catalytic reactor (10)(see Figs. 9a-9b and Col. 15, Lines 9-17); and a system controller (100, controller - Col. 15, Line 18) communicatively coupled to the power supply (52) and the thermocouple (90) and configured to instruct the power supply (52) to provide electrical power between the first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”) and the second electrode (see Fig. 6 at “ELECTRODES”) in response to the temperature of the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) received from the thermocouple (90)(see Figs. 6, 9a-9b, Col. 15, Line 9 - Col. 16, Line 14). Re claim 25: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses a method of operating a catalytic heating system (Figs. 9a-9b) comprising a self-heated catalytic reactor (10, electrically-heated catalyst combustion unit - Col. 4, Lines 64-66), a power supply (52, power controller - Col. 15, Line 22 (element 52 corresponds to “VOLTAGE SOURCE” depicted in Fig. 6)), a thermocouple (90, thermocouples - Col. 15, Lines 10-11), and a system controller (100, controller - Col. 15, Line 18), the method comprising: determining temperature of the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) using the thermocouple (90)(see Figs. 9a-9b, Col. 15, Lines 18-14, Col. 15, Line 57 - Col. 16, Line 34), wherein the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) comprises a conductive layer (12, corrugated foil - Col. 6, Line 8; 14, flat foil - Col. 6, Line 8 (see Col. 7, Lines 28-40)), an insulator layer (72, dielectric - Col. 11, Line 65), a catalyst layer (74, washcoat layer - Col. 12, Line 3), a first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”), and a second electrode (see Fig. 6 at “ELECTRODES”), wherein: the conductive layer (12, 14) comprises a first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a type of first end (see also Fig. 1a))) and a second end (Modified Fig. 6 above - B (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element B as a type of second end (see also Fig. 1a))), opposite of the first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A)(see Fig. 1a and Modified Fig. 6 above), wherein the first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A) and the second end (Modified Fig. 6 above - B) define a length of the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 1a and Modified Fig. 6 above), the insulator layer (72) forms a stack (Modified Fig. 7 above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a type of stack)) together with the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 7 (also Figs. 1a and 6)), wherein each pair of adjacent layers of the conductive layer (12, 14) in the stack is separated by the insulator layer (72)(see Fig. 7), the catalyst layer (74) is positioned on and supported on at least the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 7 and Col. 12, Lines 21-25), the first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”) is electrically coupled to the conductive layer (12, 14) at the first end (Modified Fig. 6 above - A)(see Modified Fig. 6 above and Col. 8, Lines 1-7), and the second electrode (see Fig. 6 at “ELECTRODES”) is electrically coupled to the conductive layer (12, 14) at the second end (Modified Fig. 6 above - B)(see Modified Fig. 6 above and Col. 8, Lines 1-7); activating the power supply (52) and supplying electrical power between the first electrode (ee Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”) and the second electrode (see Fig. 6 at “ELECTRODES”) using the power supply when the temperature of the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) is below a first threshold, thereby resistively heating the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Figs. 6-7, 9a-9b, Col. 16, Lines 3-34); flowing fuel (see Fig. 9a at “FUEL”) and oxidant (see Fig. 9a at “AIR”) into the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) when the temperature of the self- heated catalytic reactor (10) reaches the first threshold (Col. 16, Lines 3-34); and deactivating the power supply (52) and stopping supplying the electrical power between the first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”) and the second electrode (see Fig. 6 at “ELECTRODES”) when the temperature of the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) reaches a second threshold (Col. 16, Lines 3-34). Re claim 1: Rostrup-Nielsen (2nd embodiment) discloses a self-heated catalytic reactor (10, electrically-heated catalyst combustion unit - Col. 4, Lines 64-66) comprising: a conductive layer (12, corrugated foil - Col. 6, Line 8; 14, flat foil - Col. 6, Line 8 (see Col. 7, Lines 28-40)) comprising a first end (see Fig. 1a at element 22 (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize a type of first end of 12,14 is shown at element 22)) and a second end (see Fig. 1a at element 24 (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize a type of second end of 12, 14 is shown at 24)), opposite of the first end (Fig. 1a at element 22)(see Fig. 1a), wherein the first end (Fig. 1a at element 22) and the second end (Fig. 1a at element 24) define a length of the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 1a); an insulator layer (72, dielectric - Col. 11, Line 65) forming a stack (Modified Fig. 7 above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a type of stack)) together with the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 7 (also Fig. 1a)), wherein each pair of adjacent layers of the conductive layer (12, 14) in the stack is separated by the insulator layer (72)(see Fig. 7), and a catalyst layer (74, washcoat layer - Col. 12, Line 3) positioned on and supported on at least the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Fig. 7 and Col. 12, Lines 21-25); a first electrode (22, electrode - Col. 8, Lines 3-4) electrically coupled to the conductive layer (12, 14) at the first end (Fig. 1a at element 22)(see Fig. 1a above and Col. 8, Lines 1-7); and a second electrode (24, electrode - Col. 8, Lines 3-4) electrically coupled to the conductive layer (12, 14) at the second end (Fig. 1a at element 24)(see Fig. 1a above and Col. 8, Lines 1-7). Re claim 2: Rostrup-Nielsen (2nd embodiment) discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), wherein the stack (Modified Fig. 7 above - A) is a wound stack (see Modified Fig. 7 above at A, Fig. 1a, and Col. 6, Lines 9-16) forming a coil around the first electrode (22)(see Modified Fig. 7 above and Fig. 1a). Re claim 5: Rostrup-Nielsen (2nd embodiment) discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 2 (as described above), wherein the stack (Modified Fig. 7 above - A) is a double-coil wound stack (see Modified Fig. 7 above at A, Fig. 1a, and Col. 6, Lines 9-16) with both the first electrode (22) and the second electrode (24) positioned at an exterior of the stack (see Modified Fig. 7 above and Fig. 1a). Re claim 6: Rostrup-Nielsen (2nd embodiment) discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 5 (as described above), wherein the insulator layer (72) comprises two portions (see Fig. 7 at plural elements 72) positioned on different sides (Modified Fig. 7 above - B, C (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize elements B, C as different sides of element 12)) of the conductive layer (12, 14)(see Modified Fig. 7 above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rostrup-Nielsen et al. (U.S. 6,109,018), as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Whittenberger (U.S. 5,070,694). PNG media_image3.png 607 855 media_image3.png Greyscale Re claims 9-10: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), further comprising an enclosure (Modified Fig. 9b above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a type of enclosure)) housing the stack (see Modified Fig. 7 above at A)(see Figs. 6, 7, and 9b), wherein: each of the first electrode (see Fig. 6 at “CENTER ELECTRODE”) and the second electrode (see Fig. 6 at “ELECTRODE”) protrudes through Rostrup-Nielsen fails to disclose wherein each of the first electrode and the second electrode is insulated from the enclosure, nor wherein the conductive layer is insulated from the enclosure (Claim 9); nor wherein the conductive layer is insulated from the enclosure by at least one of: the insulator layer positioned between the conductive layer and the enclosure, or an enclosure insulator positioned between the conductive layer and the enclosure. Whittenberger teaches a self-heated catalytic reactor (10, electrically heatable catalytic core - Col. 4, Lines 29-30) wherein each of a first electrode (26, terminal post - Col. 5, Line 57) and a second electrode (14, central post - Col. 5, Line 7) is insulated from an enclosure (52, housing - Col. 6, Line 5)(see Fig. 5 and Col. 6, Lines 1-32), and wherein a conductive layer (18, outer steel binder shell - Col. 6, Line 12) is insulated from the enclosure (52)(see Fig. 5 and Col. 6, Lines 1-32); and wherein the conductive layer (18) is insulated from the enclosure (52) by an enclosure insulator (62, flexible ceramic insulation mat - Col. 6, Line 14) positioned between the conductive layer (18) and the enclosure (52)(see Fig. 5 and Col. 6, Lines 1-32). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modeled the self-heated catalytic reactor of Rostrup-Nielsen after that of Whittenberger, thereby making the first electrode and the second electrode of Rostrup-Nielsen be insulated from the enclosure of Rostrup-Nielsen by making the conductive layer of Rostrup-Nielsen be insulated from the enclosure of Rostrup-Nielsen by positioning an insulator layer between the conductive layer and the enclosure of Rostrup-Nielsen, all in the way taught by Whittenberger, for the advantage of being able to dispose the self-heated catalytic reactor within a housing which is conveniently formed (Whittenberger; Col. 6, Lines 8-11). Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rostrup-Nielsen et al. (U.S. 6,109,018), as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Tsai et al. (U.S. 5,456,890). Re claim 11: Rostrup-Nielsen discloses the self-heated catalytic reactor (10) of claim 1 (as described above), further comprising an enclosure (Modified Fig. 9b above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a type of enclosure)) housing the stack (see Modified Fig. 7 above at A)(see Figs. 6, 7, and 9b). Rostrup-Nielsen fails to disclose wherein the enclosure is operable as the second electrode such that the conductive layer at the second end is electrically coupled to the enclosure. Tsai teaches a self-heated catalytic reactor (10, converter body - Col. 8, Line 5 (see Abstract)) comprising an enclosure (18, retainer portion - Col. 8, Lines 20-24) housing a stack (12, core - Col. 8, Lines 5-9) and operable as a second electrode (see Fig. 7 at elements 116 and 118 and Col. 11, Lines 7-15) such that a conductive layer (76, strip - Col. 10, Line 9) at a second end (92, end - Col. 10, Line 31) is electrically coupled to the enclosure (18)(see Figs. 1-4, 7, and Col. 10, Line 8 - Col. 11, Line 15). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modeled the self-heated catalytic reactor of Rostrup-Nielsen after that of Tsai, thereby making the enclosure of Rostrup-Nielsen be operable as the second electrode of Rostrup-Nielsen such that the conductive layer at the second end of Rostrup-Nielsen is electrically coupled to the enclosure of Rostrup-Nielsen, in the way taught by Tsai, for the advantage of being able to use all current for heating and to prevent loss (Tsai; Col. 9, Lines 42-49). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Loren C Edwards whose telephone number is (571)272-7133. The examiner can normally be reached M-R 6AM-430PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Laurenzi can be reached at (571) 270-7878. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LOREN C EDWARDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3746 11/7/25 /MARK A LAURENZI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601483
ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED COMBUSTION LINER AND AXIAL FUEL STAGE INJECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592312
SURGICAL DATA SYSTEM AND CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590572
ACTUATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584472
COMPRESSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584660
ENHANCED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.2%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 655 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month