Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/326,679

ELECTRIC TOOL, AND ELECTRIC TOOL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 31, 2023
Examiner
HENSON, KATINA N
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
344 granted / 631 resolved
-15.5% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
77 currently pending
Career history
708
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on December 19, 2025 has been entered. Status of Claims Claims 1 – 20 are pending. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over SUB (KR101690536 B1 in view of Coffland et al. (U. S. Patent No. 9,256,220 B1). Regarding Independent Claim 1, Sub teaches An electric tool (electric tool, 100; Fig. 1), comprising: a tightening unit (Paragraph [0031]) including a motor (Paragraph [0029]) and configured to perform a tightening task of tightening a component by a drive force of the motor as a drive source (Paragraphs [0029] – [0031]); a communications unit (Paragraph [0025]) configured to transmit the working data (Paragraph [0009]); a storage unit (Paragraph [0027] configured to store the working data (Paragraph [0009]); and a tool body (Fig. 1) which is portable-type and which houses therein or holds the tightening unit (Fig. 1), the communications unit, and the storage unit (Paragraphs [0025] and [0027]), the electric tool (Fig. 1) having, as a communications mode for transmitting the working data stored in the storage unit from the communications unit (Paragraph [0009]). Sub does not explicitly teach a sensor unit configured to perform a measurement processing including measuring at least a tightening torque provided by the tightening unit and obtaining working data relating to a result of measurement; a tool body which houses therein the sensor unit; a first communications mode and a second communications mode, the communications unit being configured to, in the first communications mode, transmit, during an interval between the tightening tasks, first working data which is part of the working data stored in the storage unit, and in the second communications mode, transmit at least second working data after completion of all of the tightening tasks, the second working data being the working data stored in the storage unit except the first working data. Coffland, however, teaches an electric tool (electric torque wrench, 44; Fig. 4), comprising: a tightening unit (jaws, 48) configured to perform a plurality of tightening tasks by repeatedly performing a tightening task of tightening a component by a drive force of a drive source (torquing of a plurality of nuts, 38; Col 5, line 66 – Col. 6, line 5); a sensor unit (strain gauge sensor, 50) configured to perform a measurement processing including measuring at least a tightening torque provided by the tightening unit (48) while each of the plurality of tightening task are performed (Col. 9, line 55 – Col. 10, line 8) and obtaining working data relating to a result of measurement (Col. 6, lines 6 – 36); the working data including first and second working data (Abstract); a communications unit (pulse signal transmitter, 52) configured to transmit the working data (Col. 6, lines 6 – 36); a storage unit (memory, 53) configured to store the working data (Col. 6, lines 6 – 36) including the first and second working data (Col. 9, line 55 – Col. 10, line 8); and a tool body (Fig. 4) which is portable-type and which houses therein or holds the tightening unit (48; Fig. 4), the sensor unit (50), the communications unit (52), and the storage unit (53; Fig. 4), the electric tool (44) having, as a communications mode for transmitting the working data stored in the storage unit from the communications unit (52), a first communications mode and a second communications mode (Abstract), wherein the measurement processing includes torque measurement processing including performing a torque measurement of measuring the tightening torque and obtaining a tightening torque value which is a result of the torque measurement (Col. 6, lines 6 – 36), determination processing including performing a determination about a quality of the tightening task based on the tightening torque value and obtaining determination result data relating to a result of the determination (Measuring/trigger circuit 57 measures the digital signal and issues a trigger signal when the measured signal exceeds a threshold value, indicating, for example, that a nut has been torqued to a nominal value, or has surpassed a minimum threshold to indicate torque has been or is being applied - Col. 6, lines 6 – 36 and Col. 7, lines 23 – 45), the first working data contains at least one kind of information selected from a group consisting of the tightening torque value and the determination result data (Col. 4, line 26 – Col. 5, line 24), and the second working data contains the other of the tightening torque value or the determination result data for each of the plurality of tightening tasks (Measuring/trigger circuit 57 measures the digital signal and issues a trigger signal when the measured signal exceeds a threshold value, indicating, for example, that a nut has been torqued to a nominal value, or has surpassed a minimum threshold to indicate torque has been or is being applied - Col. 6, lines 6 – 36), the communications unit being configured to, in the first communications mode, transmit, during an interval between the tightening tasks, without transmitting the second working data (the first working data is stored and does not include the completion data which is the second working data), the first working data which is part of the working data stored in the storage unit (Col. 4, line 26 – Col. 5, line 24), and in the second communications mode, transmit at least the second working data after completion of all of the plurality of tightening tasks, without transmitting the first working data (Col. 17, lines 24 – 36; data may include completion of tasks only, thus the first working data is not included); the second working data being the working data stored in the storage unit except the first working data (Col. 17, lines 24 – 36; data may include completion of tasks only, thus the first working data is not included and Col. 23, line 63 – Col. 24, line 14). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Sub to further explicitly teach a sensor unit configured to perform a measurement processing including measuring at least a tightening torque provided by the tightening unit and obtaining working data relating to a result of measurement; a tool body which houses therein the sensor unit; a first communications mode and a second communications mode, the communications unit being configured to, in the first communications mode, transmit, during an interval between the tightening tasks, first working data which is part of the working data stored in the storage unit, and in the second communications mode, transmit at least second working data after completion of all of the tightening tasks, the second working data being the working data stored in the storage unit except the first working data, as taught by Coffland, to provide an improved system for monitoring and verifying the completion of certain manufacturing operations, thus improving the production time of such tasks. Regarding Claim 2, Sub, as modified, teaches the electric tool of claim 1 as discussed above. Sub does not teach the communications unit is configured to, in the first communications mode, every time the tightening task finishes one or more times, transmit one or more pieces of the first working data of the working data stored in the storage unit corresponding to the one or more times of the tightening task that has finished, and in the second communications mode, after completion of all of the tightening tasks, transmit at least the second working data of the working data stored in the storage unit corresponding to all of the tightening tasks. Coffland, however, teaches the electric tool (electric torque wrench, 44; Fig. 4) wherein the communications unit (52) is configured to, in the first communications mode, every time the tightening task finishes one or more times, transmit one or more pieces of the first working data of the working data stored in the storage unit corresponding to the one or more times of the tightening task that has finished, and in the second communications mode (Col. 4, line 26 – Col. 5, line 24), after completion of all of the tightening tasks, transmit at least the second working data of the working data stored in the storage unit corresponding to all of the plurality tightening tasks (Col. 23, line 63 – Col. 24, line 14). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Sub to further explicitly teach the communications unit is configured to, in the first communications mode, every time the tightening task finishes one or more times, transmit one or more pieces of the first working data of the working data stored in the storage unit corresponding to the one or more times of the tightening task that has finished, and in the second communications mode, after completion of all of the tightening tasks, transmit at least the second working data of the working data stored in the storage unit corresponding to all of the tightening tasks, as taught by Coffland, to provide an improved system for monitoring and verifying the completion of certain manufacturing operations, thus improving the production time of such tasks. Regarding Claim 3, Sub, as modified, teaches the electric tool of claim 2 as discussed above. Sub does not teach the measurement processing includes torque measurement processing including performing a torque measurement of measuring the tightening torque and obtaining a tightening torque value which is a result of the torque measurement, determination processing including performing a determination about a quality of the tightening task based on the tightening torque value and obtaining determination result data relating to a result of the determination, and related measurement processing including performing a related measurement relating to the torque measurement and obtaining a related value which is a result of the related measurement, the first working data contains at least one kind of information selected from a group consisting of the tightening torque value and the determination result data, and the second working data contains one or more kinds of information selected from a group consisting of the tightening torque value, the determination result data, and the related value except the at least one kind of information contained in the first working data. Coffland, however, teaches the electric tool (electric torque wrench, 44; Fig. 4) wherein the measurement processing related measurement processing including performing a related measurement relating to the torque measurement and obtaining a related value which is a result of the related measurement (Col. 7, lines 23 – 45), and the second working data contains one or more selected from the group consisting of the tightening torque value, the determination result data, and the related value except that the first working data includes (Col. 4, line 26 – Col. 5, line 24; Col. 17, lines 24 – 36; data may include completion of tasks only, thus the first working data is not included and Col. 23, line 63 – Col. 24, line 14)). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Sub to further explicitly teach the measurement processing includes torque measurement processing including performing a torque measurement of measuring the tightening torque and obtaining a tightening torque value which is a result of the torque measurement, determination processing including performing a determination about a quality of the tightening task based on the tightening torque value and obtaining determination result data relating to a result of the determination, and related measurement processing including performing a related measurement relating to the torque measurement and obtaining a related value which is a result of the related measurement, the first working data contains at least one kind of information selected from a group consisting of the tightening torque value and the determination result data, and the second working data contains one or more kinds of information selected from a group consisting of the tightening torque value, the determination result data, and the related value except the at least one kind of information contained in the first working data, as taught by Coffland, to provide an improved system for monitoring and verifying the completion of certain manufacturing operations, thus improving the production time of such tasks. Regarding Claim 4, Sub, as modified, teaches the electric tool of claim 3 as discussed above. Sub does not teach the first working data contains the determination result data, and the second working data contains the tightening torque value and the related value Coffland, however, teaches the electric tool (electric torque wrench, 44; Fig. 4) wherein the first working data contains the determination result data (Col. 4, line 26 – Col. 5, line 24), and the second working data contains the tightening torque value and the related value (Col. 4, line 26 – Col. 5, line 24). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Sub to further explicitly teach the first working data contains the determination result data, and the second working data contains the tightening torque value and the related value, as taught by Coffland, to provide an improved system for monitoring and verifying the completion of certain manufacturing operations, thus improving the production time of such tasks. Regarding Claim 5, Sub, as modified, teaches the electric tool of claim 4 as discussed above. Sub does not teach the communications unit is configured to, in the second communications mode, transmit detail working data containing both the first working data and the second working data. Coffland, however, teaches the electric tool (electric torque wrench, 44; Fig. 4) wherein the communications unit (52) is configured to, in the second communications mode, transmit detail working data containing both the first working data and the second working data (Col. 4, line 26 – Col. 5, line 24). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Sub to further explicitly teach the communications unit is configured to, in the second communications mode, transmit detail working data containing both the first working data and the second working data, as taught by Coffland, to provide an improved system for monitoring and verifying the completion of certain manufacturing operations, thus improving the production time of such tasks. Regarding Claim 6, Sub, as modified by Coffland, teaches the electric tool of claim 5 as discussed above. Coffland does not explicitly teach the storage unit is configured to delete, from the storage unit, part, transmitted by the communications unit, of the detail working data. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Coffland to further explicitly include the storage unit is configured to delete, from the storage unit, part, transmitted by the communications unit, of the detail working data, since it has been held that omission of an element and its function in a combination where the remaining elements perform the same functions as before involves only routine skill in the art (MPEP 2144.04). Regarding Claim 7, Sub, as modified, teaches the electric tool of claim 6 as discussed above. Sub does not teach the storage unit is configured, in the first communications mode, even when the communications unit transmits the determination result data, not to delete the determination result data transmitted by the communications unit, and in the second communications mode, when the communications unit transmits the detail working data, to delete the detail working data transmitted by the communications unit. Coffland, however, teaches the electric tool (electric torque wrench, 44; Fig. 4) wherein the storage unit (53) is configured, in the first communications mode, even when the communications unit transmits the determination result data, not to delete the determination result data transmitted by the communications unit (Col. 6, lines 6 – 36). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Sub to further explicitly teach the storage unit is configured, in the first communications mode, even when the communications unit transmits the determination result data, not to delete the determination result data transmitted by the communications unit, and in the second communications mode, when the communications unit transmits the detail working data, to delete the detail working data transmitted by the communications unit, as taught by Coffland, to provide an improved system for monitoring and verifying the completion of certain manufacturing operations, thus improving the production time of such tasks. Coffland does not teach in the second communications mode, when the communications unit transmits the detail working data, to delete the detail working data transmitted by the communications unit. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Coffland to further explicitly include in the second communications mode, when the communications unit transmits the detail working data, to delete the detail working data transmitted by the communications unit, since it has been held that omission of an element and its function in a combination where the remaining elements perform the same functions as before involves only routine skill in the art (MPEP 2144.04). Regarding Claim 8, Sub, as modified, teaches the electric tool of claim 7 as discussed above. Sub does not teach the storage unit is configured, in the second communications mode, not to delete immediately but keep the detail working data transmitted by the communications unit as long as possible. Coffland, however, teaches the electric tool (electric torque wrench, 44; Fig. 4) wherein the storage unit is configured, in the second communications mode, not to delete immediately but keep the detail working data transmitted by the communications unit as long as possible (Col. 6, lines 6 – 36 – Coffland does not teach any deletion of data). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Sub to further explicitly teach the storage unit is configured, in the second communications mode, not to delete immediately but keep the detail working data transmitted by the communications unit as long as possible, as taught by Coffland, to provide an improved system for monitoring and verifying the completion of certain manufacturing operations, thus improving the production time of such tasks. Regarding Claims 9 – 16, Sub, as modified, teaches the electric tool of claims 1 – 8 as discussed above. Sub does not teach the communications unit includes a wireless communications unit configured to transmit the first working data under a wireless communications scheme, and a wired communications unit configured to transmit the second working data under a wired communications scheme, the first communications mode is a wireless communications mode, the second communications mode is a wired communications mode, in the wireless communications mode, the wireless communications unit transmits the first working data under the wireless communications scheme during the interval between tightening tasks, and in the wired communications mode, the wired communications unit transmits at least the second working data under the wired communications scheme after completion of all the tightening tasks. Coffland, however, teaches the electric tool (electric torque wrench, 44; Fig. 4) wherein the communications unit (52) includes a wireless communications unit configured to transmit the first working data under a wireless communications scheme (Col. 4, lines 8 – 69), and a wired communications unit configured to transmit the second working data under a wired communications scheme (Col. 4, lines 8 – 69), the first communications mode is a wireless communications mode, the second communications mode is a wired communications mode (Col. 4, line 26 – Col. 5, line 24), in the wireless communications mode, the wireless communications unit transmits the first working data under the wireless communications scheme during the interval between tightening tasks (Col. 4, lines 8 – 69), and in the wired communications mode, the wired communications unit transmits at least the second working data (Col. 4, line 26 – Col. 5, line 24) under the wired communications scheme after completion of all the plurality of tightening tasks (Col. 4, lines 8 – 69). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Sub to further explicitly teach the communications unit includes a wireless communications unit configured to transmit the first working data under a wireless communications scheme, and a wired communications unit configured to transmit the second working data under a wired communications scheme, the first communications mode is a wireless communications mode, the second communications mode is a wired communications mode, in the wireless communications mode, the wireless communications unit transmits the first working data under the wireless communications scheme during the interval between tightening tasks, and in the wired communications mode, the wired communications unit transmits at least the second working data under the wired communications scheme after completion of all the tightening tasks, as taught by Coffland, to provide an improved system for monitoring and verifying the completion of certain manufacturing operations, thus improving the production time of such tasks. Regarding Claims 17 – 20 , Sub, as modified, teaches the electric tool (Fig. 1) of claims 1 – 3 and 9 as discussed above. Sub does not teach a receiver configured to receive the working data transmitted from the communications unit. Coffland, however, teaches electric tool system, comprising: the electric tool (44; Fig. 4) of claim 1; and a receiver (receiver and data assembler, 62) configured to receive the working data transmitted from the communications unit (52). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the tool of Sub to further explicitly teach a receiver configured to receive the working data transmitted from the communications unit, as taught by Coffland, to provide an improved system for monitoring and verifying the completion of certain manufacturing operations, thus improving the production time of such tasks. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed December 19, 2025 regarding the rejection of claims 1 – 20 under 35 U. S. C. 103 have been fully considered and are not persuasive; therefore the rejection is maintained. Applicant argues the second working data of Coffland is not stored in the storage unit. Examiner respectfully disagrees. The second working data involves completion of the operation being identified by displaying data related to the area in a table. One illustrative example of displaying data in table form is table 98 of FIG. 9. Table 98 displays the module number, fitting number, and torque value of the area which received the operation. In another illustrative example. Further, Data regarding operation 2214 may be saved in memory 2226. Data regarding performance of operation 2214 may be selected from at least one of beginning time of operation 2214, completion time of operation 2214, data from sensor 2218 during operation 2214, data transmitted in signals 2236 regarding operation 2214, and other data. Memory 2226 may contain data regarding the type of operation such as type of tool 2204, the desired value for operation 2214, type of area to receive operation 2214, and other data regarding type of operation for operation 2214. Memory 2226 may also store data received from sources outside of tool 2204 such as data received from display and reporting system 2210 or locating system 2208. Coffland explicitly teaches first and second data as well as saving said data. Applicant further argues that none of the cited references teaches only transmitting first or second data, without transmitting the other components. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Coffland discloses torquing of nuts 38 may be monitored, recorded, and displayed. Beginning at 122, a production worker uses electronic torque wrench 44 to torque a nut 38. When strain gauge sensor 50 (FIGS. 4 and 5) senses that the nominal or threshold torque value has been reached, electronic torque wrench 44 transmits torque signals comprising UWB pulse signals that contain the torque value, shown at step 124. The torque signals (UWB pulse signals) are received at UWB radios 60 within wheel well 36, as shown at 126. The resulting location measurements are then used by processor 66 to calculate the location of electronic torque wrench 44 in three dimensional object space, as shown at 128. At 130, processor 66 associates the wrench location with nut 38, and at 132, the torque value for nut 38 is recorded. At 134, processor 66 translates the location of nut 38 from three dimensional coordinate system 26 of wheel well 36, to coordinate system 34 of the three dimensional space represented by the displayed image. Nut 38 is then displayed along with the recorded torque value at 134. Torque verification reports may be optionally generated, as desired, at 136 – which represents the first data and excludes any of the second data. Further, Figure 24 clearly shows the second data upon completion and it does not include the first data. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATINA N HENSON whose telephone number is (571)272-8024. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday; 5:30am to 3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Carter can be reached at 571-272-4475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATINA N. HENSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 09, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 27, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593949
CLEANING DEVICE AND USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593950
WAND WITH INTEGRAL HOSE CLEANOUT FEATURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588749
POOL CLEANING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582224
Determining a Pressure Associated with an Oral Care Device, and Methods Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575512
Debris Blower
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+31.9%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month