Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/326,741

FLIP-ABLE VAV PIPING PACKAGE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 31, 2023
Examiner
TAVAKOLDAVANI, KAMRAN
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Trane International Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
361 granted / 437 resolved
+12.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
484
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
84.4%
+44.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 437 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Amendments filed on 1/29/2026 have been entered. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Karamanos (US 2020/0355394 A1), in view of Etter (US 2019/0234168 A1), and in view of Zhou (US 2022/0214058 A1). Claim 1: Karamanos discloses a piping package for a heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration system, comprising: a supply pipe (244/5400 outlet pipe assembly), the supply pipe (244) including a first blow-down valve (272) and a first air vent (242); a return pipe (204 inlet pipe assembly), the return pipe (204) including a second blow-down valve (222) and a second air vent (paragraph [37] & paragraph [75]: both piping assemblies 202/232 include pressure gage 286, for example gas such as air or other gases or liquid may be used as appropriate for materials used in piping assemblies; to clarify, based on air being through piping assemblies, drain 216 used as a vent); and an enclosure (104) configured to surround the supply pipe (244) and the return pipe (204), the enclosure (104) having at least a horizontal plane (to clarify, planes are arbitrary), and the first blow-down valve (272) and the second blow-down valve (222) are installed in opposite directions relative to the horizontal plane (annotated FIG.1), and the first air vent (242) and the second air vent (216) are installed in opposite directions relative to the horizontal plane (see annotated FIG.1). [AltContent: textbox (horizontal plane)][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 547 728 media_image1.png Greyscale Karamanos discloses the claimed limitations in claim 1, but fails to disclose the enclosure including a first access opening configured to allow access to the first blow-down valve and a second access opening configured to allow access to the second blow-down valve, wherein the supply pipe and the return pipe are installed in the enclosure in a horizontal direction, Etter teaches a first access opening (door 12) configured to allow access to the first blow-down valve, and a second access (door 12; see FIG.4) opening configured to allow access to the second blow-down valve (paragraph [53]: piping assembly and valves in housing; valves of each housing 102) for the purpose of reducing effects of weather conditions by the use of weather resistant materials in the housing (paragraph [12]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to modify the invention of Karamanos to include a first access opening configured to allow access to the first blow-down valve and a second access opening configured to allow access to the second blow-down valve as taught by Etter in order to reduce effects of weather conditions by the use of weather resistant materials in the housing. Further, Zhou teaches the supply pipe and the return pipe are installed in the enclosure (paragraph [2] [20]: valves and pipes and other components that make up the system are all in an integral housing, invention provides an integrated system which includes air duct assembly) in a horizontal direction (as shown in FIG.1 the housing and air ducts sitting in a horizontal direction) for the purpose of improving of construction of an air duct assembly by providing an integrated system with characteristics of simple structure, convenient installation and space saving (paragraph [1]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to modify the invention of Karamanos to include wherein the supply pipe and the return pipe are installed in the enclosure in a horizontal direction as taught by Zhou in order to improve of construction of an air duct assembly by providing an integrated system with characteristics of simple structure, convenient installation and space saving. Clam 2: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a heat exchanger (paragraph [107]: heat exchange), wherein the supply pipe (244) and the return pipe (204) are each connected to a process fluid side (side is inherent to heat exchanger) of the heat exchanger (paragraph [107]: heat exchange). Clam 3: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the enclosure has a removable side panel (Etter sides panels in FIG.1). Clam 4: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the return pipe (204) includes a control valve (shutoff valve 3810 used as control valve) including an actuator (paragraph [117]: actuator wires/3way actuator). Clam 5: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 4, further comprising a bypass line (bypass piping assembly 3800; paragraph [116]: passage can be open/close via operation of bypass shutoff valve 3810) extending from the supply pipe (passage 3410 in FIG.14A is pipe 244/pipe assembly 5400 in FIG.1) to the control valve (3810). Clam 6: Karamanos discloses a heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration system, comprising a piping package, the piping package comprising: a supply pipe, the supply pipe (244 outlet pipe assembly) including a first blow-down valve and a first air vent (242); a return pipe, the return pipe (204 inlet pipe assembly) including a second blow-down valve (222) and a second air vent (paragraph [37] & paragraph [75]: both piping assemblies 202/232 include pressure gage 286, for example gas such as air or other gases or liquid may be used as appropriate for materials used in piping assemblies; to clarify, based on air being through piping assemblies, drain 216 used as a vent); and an enclosure (104) configured to surround the supply pipe (244) and the return pipe (204), the enclosure (104) having at least a horizontal plane (to clarify, planes are arbitrary), and the first blow-down valve (272) and the second blow-down valve (222) are installed in opposite directions relative to the horizontal plane (annotated FIG.1), and the first air vent (242) and the second air vent (216) are installed in opposite directions relative to the horizontal plane (see annotated FIG.1). PNG media_image2.png 364 695 media_image2.png Greyscale Karamanos discloses the claimed limitations in claim 6, but fails to disclose the enclosure including a first access opening configured to allow access to the first blow-down valve and a second access opening configured to allow access to the second blow-down valve, wherein the supply pipe and the return pipe are installed in the enclosure in a horizontal direction, Etter teaches a first access opening (door 12) configured to allow access to the first blow-down valve, and a second access (door 12; see FIG.4) opening configured to allow access to the second blow-down valve (paragraph [53]: piping assembly and valves in housing; valves of each housing 102) for the purpose of reducing effects of weather conditions by the use of weather resistant materials in the housing (paragraph [12]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to modify the invention of Karamanos to include a first access opening configured to allow access to the first blow-down valve and a second access opening configured to allow access to the second blow-down valve as taught by Etter in order to reduce effects of weather conditions by the use of weather resistant materials in the housing. Further, Zhou teaches the supply pipe and the return pipe are installed in the enclosure (paragraph [2] [20]: valves and pipes and other components that make up the system are all in an integral housing, invention provides an integrated system which includes air duct assembly) in a horizontal direction (as shown in FIG.1 the housing and air ducts sitting in a horizontal direction) for the purpose of improving of construction of an air duct assembly by providing an integrated system with characteristics of simple structure, convenient installation and space saving (paragraph [1]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention was made to modify the invention of Karamanos to include wherein the supply pipe and the return pipe are installed in the enclosure in a horizontal direction as taught by Zhou in order to improve of construction of an air duct assembly by providing an integrated system with characteristics of simple structure, convenient installation and space saving. Clam 7: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 6, further comprising a heat exchanger (paragraph [107]: heat exchange), wherein the supply pipe (244) and the return pipe (204) are each connected to a process fluid side (side is inherent to heat exchanger) of the heat exchanger. Clam 8: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 6, wherein the enclosure has a removable side panel (Etter sides panels in FIG.1). Clam 9: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 6, wherein the return pipe (204) includes a control valve (shutoff valve 3810 used as control valve) including an actuator (paragraph [117]: actuator wires/3way actuator). Clam 10: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 9, wherein the actuator (paragraph [117]: actuator wires/3way actuator) is terminated on a unit controller (paragraph [111]: controller 1600) of the HVACR system. Clam 11: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 9, further comprising a bypass line (bypass piping assembly 3800; paragraph [116]: passage can be open/close via operation of bypass shutoff valve 3810) extending from the supply line (passage 3410 in FIG.14A is pipe 244/pipe assembly 5400 in FIG.1) to the control valve (3810). Clam 12: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 6, further comprising a main unit (FIG.1 view of fully functional control unit) and a control box (DDC controller 112), wherein the piping package (intended use) (paragraph [9], [182]: variable air volume HVAC system, supplies volume of air to air conditioned space, embodiment includes shipping coil and pipe assembly components to a variable air volume box manufacturer by providing coils or heat exchangers with various sizes with inlet/outlet pipes) is on a same side (to clarify, VAV package is intended use for HVAC system which VAV HVAC system yields best combination of comfort can be connected to any side of HVAC system) of the main unit as the control box (FIG.1 view of fully functional control unit). Clam 13: Karamanos as modified discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 6, further comprising a main unit (FIG.1 view of fully functional control unit) and a control box (DDC controller 112), wherein the piping package (intended use) (paragraph [9], [182]: variable air volume HVAC system, supplies volume of air to air conditioned space, embodiment includes shipping coil and pipe assembly components to a variable air volume box manufacturer by providing coils or heat exchangers with various sizes with inlet/outlet pipes) is on an opposite side (to clarify, VAV package is intended use for HVAC system which VAV HVAC system yields best combination of comfort can be connected to any side of HVAC system) of the main unit from the control box (FIG.1 view of fully functional control unit). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 1/29/2026, with respect to all the claims under Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 have been fully considered and they are moot. Applicant’s arguments to new features and amendments are addressed in this office action. Therefore, a new ground(s) of rejections have been made in response to the amendments. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAMRAN TAVAKOLDAVANI whose telephone number is (313)446-6612. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8:00 am to 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Len Tran can be reached on (571)272-1184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAMRAN TAVAKOLDAVANI/Examiner, Art Unit 3763 /PAUL ALVARE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 11, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631131
ONCE-THROUGH HEAT EXCHANGER AND HEAT RECOVERY STEAM GENERATOR INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624904
HEAT EXCHANGER AND REFRIGERATION CYCLE APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624902
MODULAR THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE AND TRANSFER IN A PCM HOSTING SYSTEM
11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618595
THREE-DIMENSIONALLY DISTRIBUTED LIQUID ATOMIZATION HEAT EXCHANGER, CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, REFRIGERATION SYSTEM, AND AIR CONDITIONER
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12578121
Heat Exchanger
2y 3m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.6%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 437 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month