Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/328,152

DISASTER CONDITION INDICATION OF SERVING PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 02, 2023
Examiner
DANIEL JR, WILLIE J
Art Unit
2465
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
429 granted / 712 resolved
+2.3% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
740
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 712 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to applicant’s amendment filed on 26 February 2026. Claims 1-20 are now pending in the present application. This office action is made Non-Final. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 26 February 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Qiao et al. (hereinafter Qiao) (WO 2021/007447 A1). Regarding claims 1, 12, and 19, Qiao discloses a network node for a communication system, the network node a part of being associated with a serving public land mobile network (PLMN) for a first client device (e.g., wireless device / UE) { (see pg. 33, [00139]; pp. 56-57, [00191] ; Figs. 12-13 & 21), where the system has multiple components (network node) }, wherein the network node is configured to: transmit a first control message (e.g., parameters of access control and/or a disaster PLMN selection information) to the first client device (e.g., wireless device) in response to determining that the serving PLMN for the first client device (e.g., wireless device) is in a disaster condition, wherein the first control message (e.g., parameters of access control and/or a disaster PLMN selection information) indicates that the serving PLMN (e.g., PLMN 2) for the first client device (e.g., wireless device) is in the disaster condition { (see pg. 32, [0135]; Figs. 12-13 & 21), where the system provides service for a UE when a network is in disaster condition (see pg. 51, [0178]), and the system has a base station (e.g., first PLMN) that broadcast parameters of access control, a disaster PLMN identifier, and disaster PLMN selection information (see pp. 34-35, [0142, lines 13-22,2-5]), and the system provides a disaster PLMN that is able to detect or receive status information (e.g., network node/function due to a disaster) (see pg. 35, [00143]; pp. 35-36, [00145]), and the system provides an enhancement for the wireless device to be informed of second PLMN status (see pg. 34, [00141]) }. Regarding claims 2 and 15, Qiao discloses the network node according to claim 1, wherein the network node is an access and mobility management function (AMF) of a core network, and the first control message is a registration reject message, a de-registration request message, a configuration update command message, or a service reject message { (see pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; Figs. 12-13 & 21) }. Regarding claims 3 and 16, Qiao discloses the network node according to claim 1, wherein the network node is a network access node of a radio access network (RAN) and the first control message is a paging message { (see pg. 51, [0178]; pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; Figs. 12-13 & 21). Regarding claims 4 and 17, Qiao discloses the network node according to claim 1, wherein the network node is a network access node of a radio access network (RAN), and the first control message is a radio resource control (RRC) connection reject message, a RRC connection release message, or a RRC serving PLMN disaster condition message { (see pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; Figs. 12-13 & 21) }. Regarding claims 5 and 18, Qiao discloses the network node according to claim 1, wherein the network node is a network access node of a radio access network (RAN), and the first control message is a system information block (SIB) { (see pg. 60, [0201]; pp. 56-57, [0191]; pg. 51, [0178]; pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; Figs. 12-13 & 21) }. Regarding claims 6, Qiao discloses the network node according to claim 1, further configured to: redirect the first client device from the serving PLMN to a visiting PLMN for the first client device in response to determining that the serving PLMN for the first client device is in the disaster condition { (see pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; Figs. 12-13 & 21) }. Regarding claim 7, Qiao discloses the network node according to claim 6, wherein the visiting PLMN belongs to a 3rd generation partnership project (3GPP) or a non-3GPP system { (see pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; Figs. 12-13 & 21) }. Regarding claims 8 and 14, Qiao discloses the network node according to claim 6, wherein the first control message further indicates at least one timer defining at least one of a start register time instance at the visiting PLMN for the first client device or a re-registration time instance at the serving PLMN for the first client device { (see pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; Figs. 12-13 & 21) }. Regarding claims 9, Qiao discloses the network node according to claim 1, further configured to: transmit a second control message to a second client device in response to determining that a serving PLMN for the second client device is in the disaster condition, wherein the serving PLMN (e.g., PLMN) for the second client device (e.g., wireless device or UEs) is different from the serving PLMN (e.g., home PLMN 2) for the first client device (e.g., wireless device), and the second control message indicates that the serving PLMN for the second client device is in the disaster condition { (see pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; Figs. 12-13 & 21), and the system provides multiple different PLMNs (e.g., different home PLMNs) communicating with different wireless devices (or UEs) that have a PLMN as the home PLMN for the respective wireless devices (or UEs) (see pg. 15, [0055]; pp. 32-33, [00136; 00137, lines 18-19; 00139, lines 1-5 & 11]; pg. 35, [00144]; pp. 56-57, [00191]) }. Regarding claims 10, Qiao discloses the network node according to claim 9, wherein the network node is a network access node of a radio access network (RAN), and the second control message is a system information block (SIB) { (see pg. 60, [0201]; pp. 56-57, [0191]; pg. 51, [0178]; pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; Figs. 12-13 & 21) }. Regarding claims 11, Qiao discloses the network node according to claim 1, further configured to: transmit a third control message to a second client device in response to determining that the disaster condition for a serving PLMN for the second client device is over, wherein the serving PLMN (e.g., PLMN) for the second client device (e.g., wireless device or UEs) is different from the serving PLMN (e.g., home PLMN 2) for the first client device (e.g., wireless device), and the third control message indicates that the disaster condition for the serving PLMN for the second client device is over { (see pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; Figs. 12-13 & 21), and the system provides multiple different PLMNs (e.g., different home PLMNs) communicating with different wireless devices (or UEs) that have a PLMN as the home PLMN for the respective wireless devices (or UEs) (see pg. 15, [0055]; pp. 32-33, [00136; 00137, lines 18-19; 00139, lines 1-5 & 11]; pg. 35, [00144]; pp. 56-57, [00191]) }. Regarding claims 13 and 20, Qiao discloses the client device according to claim 12, further configured to: obtain a PLMN list comprising at least one of the visiting PLMN for the client device or one or more other visiting PLMNs for the client device; and register at one or more of the visiting PLMNs in the PLMN list in response to receiving the first control message or the second control message. { (see pg. 51, [0178]; pg. 32, [0135-0136]; pg. 30, [00129-00130]; pg. 60, [0201]; pp. 56-57, [0191]; Figs. 12-13 & 21) }. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1-20 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection necessitated by the amended language, new limitations, and/or new claims. In response to applicant’s arguments, the Examiner respectfully disagrees as the applied reference(s) provide more than adequate support and to further clarify (see the above claims for relevant citations). Repeat from office action mailed 30 October 2025 - Regarding applicant’s argument of claim 1 on pg. 6, 6th par., “…fails to discloses…transmit a first control message to the first client… wherein the first control message indicates that the serving PLMN for the first client device is in the disaster condition…”, the Examiner respectfully disagrees. Applicant has failed to interpret and appreciate the teachings of well-known prior art Qiao that clearly discloses the claimed feature(s) as would be clearly recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art. As a note, applicant admits the following: Admission #1: Applicant admits “…Qiao discuss a situation…when the home network is disabled due to disaster…possible option for the UE to be…served by the neighboring networks…operators’ policy…” (see pg. 7, 1st full par.). Admission #2: Applicant admits “…Qiao explains…UE 2 may register to the home PLMN (e.g., PLMN 2)…due to disaster and other problems…UE 2 may try to register to the PLMN 1…” (see pg. 7, 2nd full par.). In particular, Qiao discloses the language as related to the claimed feature(s) transmit a first control message (e.g., parameters of access control and/or a disaster PLMN selection information) to the first client device (e.g., wireless device) in response to determining that the serving PLMN for the first client device (e.g., wireless device) is in a disaster condition, wherein the first control message (e.g., parameters of access control and/or a disaster PLMN selection information) indicates that the serving PLMN (e.g., for the first client device (e.g., wireless device) is in the disaster condition { (see pg. 32, [0135]; Figs. 12-13 & 21), where the system provides service for a UE when a network is in disaster condition (see pg. 51, [0178]), and the system has a base station (e.g., first PLMN) that broadcast parameters of access control, a disaster PLMN identifier, and disaster PLMN selection information (see pp. 34-35, [0142, lines 13-22,2-5]) }. Therefore, as addressed above, the applied reference more than adequately meets the claim limitations. Regarding applicant's argument(s) of claims 2-20, the claims are addressed for the same reasons as set forth above and as applied in each claim rejection of the Final Action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Preman et al. (US 2023/0337167 A1) discloses client device and network for efficient disaster handling. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIE J DANIEL JR whose telephone number is (571)272-7907. The examiner can normally be reached on 9 - 6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Mui can be reached on 571-270-1420. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIE J DANIEL JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2465 WJD,Jr 04 March 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 15, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Jan 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598049
FULL-DUPLEX PARTIAL UPLINK TRANSMISSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588006
TECHNIQUES FOR SIGNALING A PANEL SWITCHING CAPABILITY OF A USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574877
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FAST ACQUISITION OF A PRIMARY SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNAL FOR 5G NEW RADIO NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563601
TERMINAL AND COMMUNICATION METHOD THEREOF IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563406
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RESOURCE MAPPING OF PDSCH ON UNLICENSED SPECTRUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+20.3%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 712 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month