Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/328,632

MULTIPURPOSE TOOL

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jun 02, 2023
Examiner
WALTERS, RYAN J
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Fiskars Finland OY AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
585 granted / 789 resolved
+4.1% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
819
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
37.7%
-2.3% vs TC avg
§102
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§112
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 789 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Title Objections The Title of the invention is objected to because of the following informalities:Title should better reflect the claimed invention such as Combination Dustpan and Brush, or similar. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claim 13 is objected to because of the following informalities:“over-moulded the body” appears to be missing a word such as “onto”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 13, 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 recites the limitation "increased and/or reduced flexibility material (34,35)". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. This language should be amended to be consistent with claim 2. Claim 18 recites the limitation “the first end is rigid to provide a shovel or cutting tool”. It is unclear if this is meant to state that the first end acts as a shovel or cutting tool, or if this is functionally claiming a separate shovel or cutting tool. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Evancha (US 3,082,455) in view of Shippen (US 9,538,895). Re Claim 1-3, 13, as best understood, Evancha discloses a cleaning tool comprising: a body 20 or 24 and upstanding side walls, the body and side walls defining a channel to collect debris, the side walls comprising retaining means 22 configured to retain a brush in use; the channel comprising a first end axially spaced from a second end (Fig. 5-8; col. 2, lines 31-72). Evancha does not disclose one of the first end and/or second end comprises a different flexibility than the channel, the first end comprises a portion of reduced flexibility material to provide a reduced flexibility at the first end, the reduced flexibility material comprises a rigid polymer, where increased and/or reduced flexibility material is over-moulded the body. However, Shippen teaches a cleaning tool 150 where one of the first end and/or second end comprises a different flexibility than the channel, the first end comprises a portion of reduced flexibility material 158 to provide a reduced flexibility at the first end, the reduced flexibility material comprises a rigid polymer, where increased and/or reduced flexibility material is over-moulded the body (Fig. 2; col. 4, lines 1-20). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize reduced flexibility material over-moulded the body, as taught by Shippen, for the purpose of to help seal dustpan to the floor as materials are guided into the dustpan (col. 4, lines 1-20). Re Claim 4, Evancha discloses the second end comprises a reduced bending resistance to provide an increased flexibility at the second end (Fig. 5-6; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 5, Evancha discloses a height dimension of the upstanding side walls varies along the axial direction (Fig. 5-6; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 6, Evancha discloses height dimension of the upstanding side walls tapers at the first end and/or second end (Fig. 5-6; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 7, Evancha discloses a width dimension of the first end is less than a width dimension of the second end (Fig. 5-6, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 8, Evancha discloses the width of the channel tapers along the axial length thereof (Fig. 5-6, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 9, Evancha discloses the width of the channel converges toward the first end (Fig. 5-6, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 10, Evancha discloses the side wall comprises an overhang or protrusion to provide said retaining means (Fig. 5-6, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 11, Evancha discloses a base extending between the side walls, the base being concave in two orthogonal dimensions (Fig. 5-6, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 12, Evancha discloses the side walls and body are collectively U-shaped in profile about the axial direction (Fig. 5-6, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 14, Evancha discloses the side wall comprises a grip member 19 (para. connecting col. 1-2). Re Claim 15, Evancha discloses the grip member is provided at an edge of the side wall (para. connecting col. 1-2). Re Claim 16, Evancha discloses the side walls are semi-flexible to allow a user to vary the width of the channel in use (Fig. 5-6, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 17, Evancha discloses the first end and/or second end comprises a leading edge facing the axial direction (Fig. 5-6, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 18, as best understood, Evancha discloses the first end is rigid to provide a shovel or cutting tool (Fig. 5-6, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 19, Evancha discloses a combination cleaning tool comprising: a dustpan 20 or 24 (Fig. 5-8, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72) having a body and upstanding side walls, the body and side walls defining a semi-tubular channel to collect debris, the channel comprising a first end axially spaced from a second end, where the side walls comprising retaining means 22; and a brush 10/12 shaped to engage the retaining means in an interference or friction fit to provide a removable connection therebetween (Fig. 5-8, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Re Claim 20, Evancha discloses the side walls are tapered, and in order to engage or disengage the retaining means, the brush is moved along the axial direction of the dustpan (Fig. 5-8, 2; col. 2, lines 31-72). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN J WALTERS whose telephone number is (571)270-5429. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at (571) 272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Ryan J. Walters/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 02, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599996
MULTI-SPINDLE MACHINE TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589457
SPINDLE UNIT AND PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586670
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FAST MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATION USING A VIRTUAL SOURCE MODEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582539
CLAMSHELL IRIS-STYLE CRIMPER FOR MEDICAL DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569950
INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND MACHINE TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.3%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 789 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month