Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/328,936

SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO DETECT DROPLET PRESENCE ON VEHICLE WINDSHIELD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 05, 2023
Examiner
VANCHY JR, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
2666
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
404 granted / 606 resolved
+4.7% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
622
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§103
60.8%
+20.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 606 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/05/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 12/22/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of the claim(s) under 35 USC 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of 35 USC 112. Claims 1, 2, 5-11, and 14-18 are pending; claims 4, 13, and 20 were previously canceled; claims 3, 12, and 19 have been currently canceled; and claims 1, 5, 10, 14, and 18 have been amended. Examiner’s Note: The Examiner would like to point out that multiple calls were placed to Applicant’s representatives, and messages left to let them know that if the independent claims were amended (to overcome 35 USC 112 rejections) the case would be in condition for Allowance. The amendments are: Changing (within the independent claims 1, 10, and 18) the limitation of “second sensor” to an “additional sensor” since a “first sensor” was never stated within the claim language. Adding the limitation of dependent claim 2 to independent claim 1; adding the limitation of dependent claim 11 into independent claim 10; and the limitation from dependent claim 2 or 11 into independent claim 18. And lastly, add to the independent claims 1, 10, and 18 the limitation “wherein the wiper control module activates the wipers”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 10, and 18 (and thus dependent claims 2, 5-9, 11, and 14-17) are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 10, and 18 state “a second sensor”, however, a “first sensor” is never stated within the claim language and thus makes “a second sensor” indefinite. Appropriate correction (such as discussed above) is required. Claims 1, 10, and 18 (and thus dependent claims 2, 5-9, 11, and 14-17) are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 10, and 18 state “receive, from a second sensor of the vehicle, information about presence of rainfall in the vicinity of the vehicle and perform a predefined action based on the presence of the droplet and presence of rainfall in the vicinity of the vehicle, wherein the predefined action includes sending a signal to a wiper control module of the vehicle”. The “sending a signal to a wiper control module of the vehicle” fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter, since the signal could be anything. Since the claim states that a droplet presence is determined and that presence of rainfall in the vicinity of the vehicle is received, the signal should be to “activate the wipers” as discussed in Applicant’s Specification as filed ([0066]). Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter The claims would be Allowable if (as stated above): Changing (within the independent claims 1, 10, and 18) the limitation of “second sensor” to an “additional sensor” since a “first sensor” was never stated within the claim language. Adding the limitation of dependent claim 2 to independent claim 1; adding the limitation of dependent claim 11 into independent claim 10; and the limitation from dependent claim 2 or 11 into independent claim 18. And lastly, add to the independent claims 1, 10, and 18 the limitation “wherein the wiper control module activates the wipers”. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J VANCHY JR whose telephone number is (571)270-1193. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emily Terrell can be reached at (571) 270-3717. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL J VANCHY JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2666 Michael.Vanchy@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jul 23, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 01, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602906
IMAGE RECOGNITION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12579596
MANAGING ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE DERIVED IMAGE ATTRIBUTES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12579634
REAL-TIME PROCESS DEFECT DETECTION AUTOMATION SYSTEM AND METHOD USING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573225
METHODS AND SYSTEMS OF FIELD DETECTION IN A DOCUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12551101
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIGITAL MEASUREMENTS OF SUBJECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+20.1%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 606 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month