Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/331,089

STRESS MITIGATION WHEN PERFORMING SUGGESTED MANEUVERS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 07, 2023
Examiner
LI, CE LI
Art Unit
3661
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
421 granted / 587 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
608
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.3%
+39.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 587 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9, 14-17 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As to claims 1-9, 14-17 and 19-20, the limitations of “generating, by the stress mitigation server, a micro cloud relative to the vehicle; and reorganizing, by the stress mitigation server, the micro cloud to mitigate the stress” are indefinite, because a micro cloud usually referred as a group of cloud computers/servers, which cannot be generated. It is unclear how reorganizing a micro cloud computers/servers could mitigate the stress of a passenger. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-13 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ce Li Li whose telephone number is (571)270-5564. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 10AM-7PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter D Nolan can be reached at 571-270-7016. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CE LI . LI Examiner Art Unit 3661 /PETER D NOLAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 07, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 13, 2026
Interview Requested
Jan 28, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 28, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630174
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HANDS-ON-WHEEL DETECTION
4y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622339
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING FIELD CONDITIONS
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617409
DRUNK DRIVING PREVENTION SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617401
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12576872
Device for Producing a Signal Which Can Be Haptically Perceived by a User of a Vehicle
2y 3m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+14.9%)
3y 1m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 587 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month