Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/332,190

ENCAPSULATED FERTILIZER COMPRISING ESSENTIAL OILS, POLYMERS AND MACRONUTRIENTS AND METHOD OF PREPARATION THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 09, 2023
Examiner
SMITH, JENNIFER A
Art Unit
1731
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ypf Tecnología S A
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
530 granted / 863 resolved
-3.6% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
916
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
47.4%
+7.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 863 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . References in Specification The listing of references in the specification is not a proper information disclosure statement. 37 CFR 1.98(b) requires a list of all patents, publications, or other information submitted for consideration by the Office, and MPEP § 609.04(a) states, "the list may not be incorporated into the specification but must be submitted in a separate paper." Therefore, unless the references have been cited by the examiner on form PTO-892, they have not been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4-7, are 12-17 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regard to claim 4, the limitation “87 to 95% nitrogen” is indefinite. Claim 3 defines the fertilizer compound as urea. Pure urea is approximately 46% nitrogen by weight. It is chemically impossible for the encapsulated fertilizer (which includes the weight of the core and coatings) to contain 87-95% nitrogen. In regard to claim 5, the phrase “comprising a solution” is unclear. The encapsulated fertilizer is a solid product and it is unclear how a solution is included in the encapsulated solid fertilizer. In regard to claims 7 and 15 the phrase “wherein the solution has an inhibitor concentration of 1:2-1:8” is indefinite. The term “concentration” is usually defined with units (e.g. wt. %). The range appears to be a ratio, not a concentration and it is unclear what the ratio represents. In regard to claim 12, the claimed solution comprising “starch and micronized sulfur” is contradictory. Claim 8 (from which claim 12 depends) recites a step c) of adding a solution and sprinkling starch and it is unclear if the starch is sprinkled separately from the solution or if the starch is present as the solution in step c. In regard to claim 17, the claimed “drying stages” are “at least 5 min in duration”. Because the drying stages occur after each of the steps b) to e) (claim 16), it is unclear if all drying stages are 5 min in duration or each stage is 5 minutes each. Indication of Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 and 8-11 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Ogle et al. (US Patent Publication No. 2010/0011825) is directed to a fertilizer composition that comprises a water-soluble central core of a plant nutrient compound in particulate form, a polymer coating on the plant nutrient, an intermediate layer (IL) on the layer of polymer, and a layer of elemental sulfur on the intermediate layer [para. 0013]. Patra et al. (US Patent No. 6,336,949) is directed to a urea nitrogenous fertilizer coated with terpene (e.g. an organic compound) [col. 3, lines 49-51]. Birthisel et al. (US Patent Publication No. 2007/0163317) discloses surface decorating granules embedded a coating with a fertilizer core, optional friable layer, coating, and active agent granules [para. 0012; Fig. 2]. Holt et al. (US Patent Publication No. 2022/0289641) discloses a coated fertilizer granule including a core that includes a water-soluble fertilizer material, a coating comprising a urethane layer impregnated with a super absorbent polymer, a controlled release layer disposed between the core and the coating and a surface treatment layer disposed about the coating that includes a surfactant and a solvent [0005]. The prior art references do not teach or render obvious all the cumulative limitations of independent claims 1 and 8 with particular attention to a “second layer comprising a polymer, micronized sulfur and starch, a third layer surrounding the second layer and a fourth layer surrounding the third layer, each of said third and fourth layers comprising micronized sulfur and starch”. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jennifer A Smith whose telephone number is (571)270-3599. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:30am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber R Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER A SMITH/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1731 December 9, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 09, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590042
LIQUID HUMIC ACID EXTRACT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12570586
DUAL FERTILIZER COMPOSITION INCLUDING AMMONIUM ACETATE AND USES THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570584
CALCIUM CYANAMIDE FERTILIZER WITH TRIAZONE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12552725
USE OF A LIQUID COMPOSITION FOR COATING PARTICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12552726
INCORPORATION OF BIOLOGICAL AGENTS IN FERTILIZERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+26.3%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 863 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month