Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/333,038

BABY BATH HARNESS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 12, 2023
Examiner
MATTEI, BRIAN DAVID
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
483 granted / 720 resolved
+15.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
732
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 720 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the application filed June 12, 2023. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 1-20 stand rejected as set forth below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4, 5, 13-17, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shewfelt (US 9,295,234). In regard to Claim 1, Shewfelt discloses a harness (Figs 4, 5) comprising: a chest strap (36, 38) formed from an anti-slip material (nylon) (column 4, lines 35-40) and comprising a laterally oriented tri-glide strap adjuster (mechanical fastener) (Figs 4, 5) (column 4, lines 5-34); a front buckle (40a, 40b) attached to the chest strap (Figs 4, 5); a front and neck strap (22, 28) formed from said anti-slip material and comprising a vertically oriented tri-glide strap adjuster (mechanical fastener) (Figs 4, 5) (column 4, lines 5-34); and an upper buckle (26a, 32a) attached to the neck strap (Figs 4, 5). In regard to Claim 4, Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, wherein the anti-slip material comprises a nylon webbing (column 4, lines 35-40). In regard to Claim 5, Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, wherein a front portion and a neck portion of the front and neck strap are attached to the chest strap at two locations on the chest strap (Figs 4, 5). In regard to Claim 13, Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, wherein the front buckle and the upper buckle are side release buckles formed by a male buckle member (26a, 40a) and a female buckle member (32a, 40b) (Figs 4, 5). In regard to Claim 14, Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, wherein the male buckle member comprises: a retaining block that accepts the chest strap and/or the front and neck strap; a center rod; and two resilient prongs equally spaced from the center rod, biased toward an outward position, and terminates at a front end of the retaining block (Figs 4, 5). In regard to Claim 15, Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, wherein the female buckle member comprises: an open side; and two side holes which hold and secure the two resilient prongs of the male buckle member (Figs 4, 5). In regard to Claim 16, Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, wherein the horizontally oriented tri-glide strap adjuster and vertically oriented tri-glide strap adjuster each comprise: a frame with a width slightly larger than a width of the chest band and the front and neck strap; a bar in a middle of the frame; and openings between the frame and the bar that accept the chest band or the front and neck strap (Figs 4, 5) (Figs 2, 3 also show a good view of how the straps are routed through the tri-glides). In regard to Claim 17, Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, wherein the harness does not comprise organic fibers (column 4, lines 35-40) (nylon is not organic). In regard to Claim 19, Shewfelt discloses a harness comprising: a first band (36, 38) comprising a first webbing slide (mechanical fastener) (Figs 4, 5) (column 4, lines 5-34); a second band (22, 28) comprising a first webbing slide (mechanical fastener) (Figs 4, 5) (column 4, lines 5-34); a first side release buckle (40, 40b) attached to the first band (Figs 4, 5); and a second side release buckle (26a, 32a) attached to the second band (Figs 4, 5). In regard to Claim 20, Shewfelt discloses a method for facilitating handling a slippery mammal comprising: securing a chest strap (36, 38) to the slippery mammal by placing a male end (40a) of a front buckle on a first end of the chest strap to a female end (40b) of the front buckle on a second end of the chest strap (Figs 4, 5) (column 4, lines 5-34); adjusting a first tri-glide strap adjuster (mechanical fastener) located on the chest strap until the chest strap is taught against a chest of the slippery mammal (column 4, lines 5-34); securing a front and neck strap (28, 30) to the slippery mammal by placing a male end (32b) of an upper buckle on a first distal end of the front and neck strap to a female end (32b) of the upper buckle on a second distal end of the front and neck strap (Figs 4, 5); and adjusting a second tri-glide strap adjuster located on the front and neck strap such that the front and neck strap leaves enough room for a handler to slide a hand behind a head of the slippery mammal during a bathing process (the length can vary as needed) (column 4, lines 5-34). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shewfelt. In regard to Claims 7-10, Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, but is silent as to the dimensions of the harness. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the harness of Shewfelt with the front portion between fourteen and sixteen centimeters in length, neck portion between thirty-five centimeters and forty-five centimeters, the front and neck portions spaced apart between 6 and 9 centimeters and the chest strap between sixty and seventy centimeters in length and at least one and a quarter times a length of the front and neck strap, in order to allow the harness to be used with for many sized individuals for maximum usability and marketability. It is noted that Shewfelt does state that the harness can be constructed in various sizes to accommodate different sized pets (column 4, lines 35-40). Claims 1, 4-17, 19 and 20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gee (US 6,125,792) in view of Shewfelt. In regard to Claim 1, Gee discloses a harness (Figs 1, 2) comprising: a chest strap (10) formed from an anti-slip material (nylon) (column 5, lines 1-30); a front buckle (40a) attached to the chest strap (Figs 1, 2); a front and neck strap (20L, 20R) formed from said anti-slip material (nylon) (column 5, lines 1-30); and an upper buckle (40B or 40C) attached to the neck strap (Figs 1, 2). Gee does not disclose tri-glide strap adjusters. Shewfelt teaches using tri-glide strap adjusters (mechanical fastener) (Figs 4, 5) (column 4, lines 5-34). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the harness as disclosed by Gee to include tri-glide strap adjusters as taught by Shewfelt, in order to easily allow the straps to be adjusted in length while being able to control the amount of length of strap that extends out from the adjuster. In regard to Claim 4, Gee discloses the harness as described above, wherein the anti-slip material comprises a nylon webbing (column 5, lines 1-30). In regard to Claim 5, Gee discloses the harness as described above, wherein a front portion and a neck portion of the front and neck strap are attached to the chest strap at two locations on the chest strap (Figs 1, 2). In regard to Claim 6, Gee discloses the harness as described above, wherein the front portion and the neck portion of the front and neck strap are orthogonally oriented with respect to the chest strap when the harness is laid flat (Fig 2). In regard to Claims 7-10, Gee discloses the harness as described above, but is silent as to the dimensions of the harness. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the harness of Gee with the front portion between fourteen and sixteen centimeters in length, neck portion between thirty-five centimeters and forty-five centimeters, the front and neck portions spaced apart between 6 and 9 centimeters and the chest strap between sixty and seventy centimeters in length and at least one and a quarter times a length of the front and neck strap, in order to allow the harness to be used with for many sized individuals for maximum usability and marketability. It is noted that Gee does state that the harness can be constructed in various sizes to accommodate different sized children (column 4, lines 19-27). In regard to Claim 11, Gee discloses the harness as described above, where the front and neck strap attach to the chest strap by way of a fold or a loop (Figs 1, 2). In regard to Claim 12, Gee in the combination teaches the harness as described above, wherein the fold or the loop is secured with a box X stitching (Figs 1, 2). In regard to Claim 13, Gee discloses the harness as described above, wherein the front buckle and the upper buckle are side release buckles formed by a male buckle member and a female buckle member (Fig 2). In regard to Claim 14, Gee discloses the harness as described above, wherein the male buckle member comprises: a retaining block that accepts the chest strap and/or the front and neck strap; a center rod; and two resilient prongs equally spaced from the center rod, biased toward an outward position, and terminates at a front end of the retaining block (Fig 2). In regard to Claim 15, Gee discloses the harness as described above, wherein the female buckle member comprises: an open side; and two side holes which hold and secure the two resilient prongs of the male buckle member (Fig 2). In regard to Claim 16, Shewfelt in the combination Gee in view of Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, wherein the horizontally oriented tri-glide strap adjuster and vertically oriented tri-glide strap adjuster each comprise: a frame with a width slightly larger than a width of the chest band and the front and neck strap; a bar in a middle of the frame; and openings between the frame and the bar that accept the chest band or the front and neck strap (Figs 4, 5) (Figs 2, 3 also show a good view of how the straps are routed through the tri-glides). In regard to Claim 17, Gee discloses the harness as described above, wherein the harness does not comprise organic fibers (column 5, lines 1-30) (nylon is not organic). In regard to Claim 19, Gee discloses a harness comprising: a first band (10) (Figs 1, 2); a second band (20L, 20R) (Figs 1, 2); a first side release buckle (41a, 42a) attached to the first band (Fig 2); and a second side release buckle (41b, 42b or 41c, 42c) attached to the second band (Fig 2). Gee does not disclose webbing slides. Shewfelt teaches using webbing slides (mechanical fastener) (Figs 4, 5) (column 4, lines 5-34). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the harness as disclosed by Gee to include webbing slides as taught by Shewfelt, in order to easily allow the straps to be adjusted in length while being able to control the amount of length of strap that extends out from the adjuster. In regard to Claim 20, Gee discloses a method for facilitating handling a slippery mammal comprising: securing a chest strap (10) to the slippery mammal by placing a male end (41a) of a front buckle on a first end of the chest strap to a female end (42a) of the front buckle on a second end of the chest strap (Figs 1, 2) (column 3, lines 1-15); securing a front and neck strap (20L, 20R) to the slippery mammal by placing a male end (41b or 41c) of an upper buckle on a first distal end of the front and neck strap to a female end (42b or 42c) of the upper buckle on a second distal end of the front and neck strap (Figs 1, 2) (column 3, lines 23-58). Gee does not disclose adjusting tri-glides on the straps. Shewfelt teaches using tri-glides to adjust the length of strap as needed (mechanical fastener) (Figs 4, 5) (column 4, lines 5-34). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the harness as disclosed by Gee to include tri-glides as taught by Shewfelt, in order to easily allow the straps to be adjusted in length while being able to control the amount of length of strap that extends out from the adjuster. Claims 2, 3 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shewfelt and/or Gee in view of Shewfelt as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Stanford et al. (US 8,147,252) (hereinafter Stanford). In regard to Claims 2 and 18, Shewfelt and or Gee in view of Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, but does not specifically disclose the anti-slip material comprises a 100% polyester webbing and does not comprise polyamide. Stanford teaches a harness made of polyester (which is not a polyamide) (column 4, lines 41-44). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the harness as disclosed by Shewfelt and/or Gee in view of Shewfelt out of polyester as taught by Stanford, since as Stanford states in column 4, lines 41-44 that it is a rugged and durable material. In regard to Claim 3, Shewfelt and or Gee in view of Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, but is silent as the total weight the harness it designed to carry. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the harness of Shewfelt and/or Gee in view of Shewfelt to be rated to able to carry at least 50 pounds so the harness can be used with multiple sized pets. It is noted Shewfelt and Gee each state that the harness can be constructed in various sizes to accommodate different sizes (Shewfelt, column 4, lines 35-40) (Gee, column 4, lines 19-27). Claims 11 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shewfelt as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Gee (US 6,125,792). In regard to Claim 11, Shewfelt discloses the harness as described above, but does not specifically disclose how the front and neck strap attach to the chest strap. Gee teaches the front and neck strap attach to the chest strap by way of a fold or a loop (Fig 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the front and neck straps of Shewfelt to be attached by a fold or loop as taught by Gee, in order to slidably attach the straps together to allow for adjustability. In regard to Claim 12, Gee in the combination teaches the harness as described above, wherein the fold or the loop is secured with a box X stitching (Gee, Fig 1). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See list of references on PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brian Mattei whose telephone number is (571)270-3238. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 8:00 to 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Namrata Boveja can be reached at 571-272-8105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN D MATTEI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 12, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577777
PANELED WALL SYSTEM COMPRISING A DUAL GASKET ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560027
MODULAR LADDER FOR STEALTH CELL TOWERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12540508
Pipe Adapter for Ladder Placement
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12523099
SAFETY LADDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12435517
TOGGLE BOLT CONNECTOR SYSTEM FOR HOLLOW JOIST
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+15.6%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 720 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month