Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/333,646

INTER-PLMN USER PLANE INTEGRATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 13, 2023
Priority
Jun 13, 2022 — provisional 63/351,675
Examiner
IQBAL, KHAWAR
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Comcast Cable Communications LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
477 granted / 654 resolved
+10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
679
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
76.2%
+36.2% vs TC avg
§102
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 654 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 04/07/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Examiner’s Note: The Examiner has pointed out particular references contained in the prior art of record within the body of this action for the convenience of the Applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply. "The use of patents as references is not limited to what the patentees describe as their own inventions or to the problems with which they are concerned. They are part of the literature of the art, relevant for all they contain." In re Heck, 699 F.2d 1331, 1332-33,216 USPQ 1038, 1039 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (quoting In re Lemelson, 397 F.2d 1006, 1009, 158 USPQ 275,277 (CCPA 1968)). A reference may be relied upon for all that it would have reasonably suggested to one having ordinary skill the art, including nonpreferred embodiments (see MPEP 2123). Therefore, Applicant, in preparing the response, must fully consider the entire disclosure of the cited references as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, including the context of the cited passages as taught by the prior art disclosed by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MA et al (20230422016) in view of Kim et al (20220217553). Regarding claim 1, Ma et al discloses, a method comprising (abstract, fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29): receiving, based on a location of a user device I.e., terminal device or UE), an indication of an intermediate session management function (i.e., I-SMF) of a network of a first operator (i.e., visited location), wherein the location is beyond a service area associated with a session management function (i.e., ASMF/SMF) of a network of a second operator (i.e., home location) (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.); receiving, based on an N16a interface (I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information base on an N16a interface) associated with the intermediate session management function of the first operator and the session management function of the network of the second operator and based on credentials of a subscriber to the network of the second operator indicative of the user device having access to the network of the second operator, information for establishing a session associated with the user device and a data network name (I.e., DNN) of the second operator (¶ 0181-082, 0251-0252, 0269-0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 19, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.); and sending, based on the information, a packet (¶ 0183, 0186-0187, fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29). Ma et al does not specifically disclose causing, based on the information, a packet to route via the network of the first operator to the network of the second operator. In the same field of endeavor, Kim et al discloses, causing, based on the information, a packet to route via the network of the first operator to the network of the second operator (¶ 0329-333, 376-0381) and Kim et al also discloses, receiving, based on the intermediate session management function establishing communications with the session management function via an interface and based on credentials configured to provide the user device having access to the network of the second operator, information for establishing a session associated with the user device and the network of the second operator (¶ 0329-333, 376-0381). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Ma et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to work is aimed at an optimized packet-based system that minimizes transmission delay with improved data transmission capability. Capacity and coverage of mobile broadband access is improved as taught by Kim et al. Regarding claims 2, 10, Ma et al discloses in claim 1 further, Ma et al discloses, further comprising translating an address associated with communications of the N16a interface from a subnet of the network of the first operator to a subnet of the network of the second operator (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.). Regarding claims 3, 11, Ma et al discloses in claim 1 further, Ma et al discloses, further comprising receiving the credentials of the subscriber (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.). Regarding claims 4, 12, 17, Ma et al discloses in claim 1 further, Ma et al discloses, further comprising: verifying the credentials of the subscriber; and sending a policy based on the credentials to the intermediate session management function (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.). Regarding claims 5, 16, Ma et al discloses in claim 1 further, Ma et al discloses, further comprising: based on the indication, initializing an instance of the intermediate session management function of the first operator (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.). Regarding claims 6, 13, Ma et al discloses in claim 1 further, Ma et al discloses, further comprising: determining, based on a second location of the user device, that the second location is within the service area of the session management function of the second operator; and stopping the instance of the intermediate session management function of the first operator (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.). Regarding claims 7, 14, 19, Ma et al discloses in claim 1 further, Ma et al discloses, further comprising: sending a policy to the user device, wherein the packet traverses the network of the second operator according to the policy (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.). Regarding claims 8, 15, 20, Ma et al discloses in claim 1 further, Ma et al discloses, wherein the policy is indicative of a quality of service associated with the session (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0357, 0361, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, configured to transmit a QoS control rule and the like to the UE and when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.). Regarding claim 9, Ma et al discloses in claim 1 further, Ma et al discloses, a method comprising (fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29): receiving a request to access a network of a first operator (¶ 0180-0182); sending, based on the request, a query to a session management function of a second operator (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.); receiving, based on a location of a user device and the query, a response from the session management function of the second operator; initializing, based on the response, an intermediate session management function of the first operator (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.); receiving, based on an N16a interface associated with the intermediate session management function of the first operator and the session management function of the network of the second operator, information for establishing a session associated with the user device and a data network name of the second operator (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.); and sending, based on the information, a packet (¶ 0183, 0186-0187, fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29). Ma et al does not specifically disclose causing, based on the information, a packet to route via the network of the first operator to the network of the second operator. In the same field of endeavor, Kim et al discloses, causing, based on the information, a packet to route via the network of the first operator to the network of the second operator (¶ 0329-333, 376-0381) and Kim et al also discloses, receiving, based on the intermediate session management function establishing communications with the session management function via an interface and based on credentials configured to provide the user device having access to the network of the second operator, information for establishing a session associated with the user device and the network of the second operator (¶ 0329-333, 376-0381). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Ma et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to work is aimed at an optimized packet-based system that minimizes transmission delay with improved data transmission capability. Capacity and coverage of mobile broadband access is improved as taught by Kim et al. Regarding claim 18, Ma et al discloses in claim 1 further, Ma et al discloses, a method comprising (fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29): receiving a request to access a network of a first operator; sending, based on the request, a query to a session management function of a network of a second operator (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.); receiving, based on a location of a user device and the query, a response from the session management function of the network of the second operator (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.); receiving, based on an N16a interface associated with an intermediate session management function of the network of the first operator and the session management function of the network of the second operator, information for establishing a session associated with the user device and a data network name of the second operator; determining, based on the information, a policy associated with a user plane function (¶ 0181-082, 0252, 0270, 0440, etc. fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29, when a terminal device moves from a home location to a visited location, an AMF may determine that a location of the terminal device leaves a service area of an A-SMF. In step 702, the AMF may select and insert the I-SMF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. Further, the AMF may further send an address of the A-SMF to the I-SMF and receive a response from the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF and the A-SMF exchange information. In step 703, the A-SMF may determine, based on a user policy of the terminal device that is previously received from a PCF, that a data flow of the terminal device needs to return to the home location and be offloaded in a roaming scenario. That is, an N9 interface of an I-UPF at the visited location needs to dock with a ULCL UPF at the home location. In step 704, the I-SMF may send a request for obtaining a peer address of an uplink tunnel of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. In step 705, in response to the request of the I-SMF, the A-SMF may send an address of the ULCL UPF to the I-SMF, so that the I-SMF sends the address of the ULCL UPF to the I-UPF. In step 706, the I-SMF may select and insert the I-UPF at the visited location based on a DNN subscribed to by the terminal device, a DNAI, a location, or other information. In step 707, the I-SMF may send an address of the I-UPF to the A-SMF. Step 707 is optional. For example, if step 706 is performed before step 704, the I-SMF may alternatively carry the address of the I-UPF in the request for obtaining the peer address of the uplink tunnel of the I-UPF.); and sending, based on the information and the policy, a packet (¶ 0183, 0186-0187, fig. 7-8, 13-14, 22, 24-29). Ma et al does not specifically disclose causing, based on the information, a packet to route via the network of the first operator to the network of the second operator. In the same field of endeavor, Kim et al discloses, causing, based on the information, a packet to route via the network of the first operator to the network of the second operator (¶ 0329-333, 376-0381) and Kim et al also discloses, receiving, based on the intermediate session management function establishing communications with the session management function via an interface and based on credentials configured to provide the user device having access to the network of the second operator, information for establishing a session associated with the user device and the network of the second operator (¶ 0329-333, 376-0381). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Ma et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to work is aimed at an optimized packet-based system that minimizes transmission delay with improved data transmission capability. Capacity and coverage of mobile broadband access is improved as taught by Kim et al. Claim(s) 21-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MA et al (20230422016) in view of Kim et al (20220217553) and Chen et al (12445825). Regarding claims 21-23, Ma et al discloses in claim 1 further, Ma et al and Kim et al do not specifically disclose wherein the intermedia session management function is configured to terminate the session based on the session management function. In the same field of endeavor, Chen et al discloses, wherein the intermedia session management function is configured to terminate the session based on the session management function (¶ 0302-0303). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Ma et al and Kim et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to communication method improves the overall communication efficiency of the network, reduces network address resources to simplify the complexity of network planning and deployment, reduces the number of nodes in the network to reduce the workload of the operation and maintenance of the network, and reduces signal ling between the nodes in the network to reduce the traffic load of the network as taught by Chen et al. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHAWAR IQBAL whose telephone number is (571)272-7909. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jinsong Hu can be reached at 5712723965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHAWAR IQBAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Nov 04, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 04, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 17, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 20, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684328
SUPPORT OF MOBILE WIRELESS DEVICES HAVING A PERMANENT ROAMING GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION USAGE PATTERN
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684516
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION CONTROL APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672034
SUPPLEMENTARY UPLINK IN WIRELESS SYSTEMS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666226
COOPERATION TECHNIQUES FOR LOW-POWER DEVICES
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12647766
CONTENT PUBLISHING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.3%)
3y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 654 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month