Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/336,169

SPIN QUBIT ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 16, 2023
Priority
Jun 23, 2022 — FR 22 06266
Examiner
MEMULA, SURESH
Art Unit
2851
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
825 granted / 942 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
963
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§103
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§102
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 942 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group I (i.e., claims 1-10) in the reply filed on 05/07/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 11-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. For fee calculating purposes, Applicant's claim 10 was initially determined to be a dependent claim because of its reference to claim 1 (MPEP §608.01(n) II.). However, claim 10’s reference to claim 1 simply functions as a cross reference. The reference to claim 1is not phrased so as the system of claim 10 further limits the device of claim 1. Instead, claim 10 is phrased as: claim 10 is drawn to a system that incorporates the limitations recited in device claim 1. While a dependent claim is required to make an express reference to a prior claim from which it depends (35 U.S.C. §112 (d)/4th paragraph), it does not follow that reference to another/prior claim indicates the claim is intended to be a dependent claim. Therefore, Applicant is required to cancel the claim, or amend the claim to place the claim in proper dependent form, or rewrite, in unequivocal terms, the claim in independent form. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 are allowed. Claims 1-9 are allowable because the prior art of record does not teach or suggest a device having all the combinations of elements recited in and required by independent claim 1, particularly including, among other things, the following: In claim 1, one magnet configured to locally generate a magnetic field gradient between the first and second quantum dots, such that the first and second quantum dots respectively have first and second resonance frequencies which are different from one another, wherein the magnet comprises at least one first magnetic domain and one second magnetic domain distributed along the longitudinal direction and separated by at least one domain wall, said first and second magnetic domains respectively have a first magnetisation and a second magnetisation of opposite directions in the longitudinal direction, so as to locally generate said magnetic field gradient between the first and second quantum dots. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner SURESH MEMULA whose telephone number is (571)272-8046, and any inquiry for a formal Applicant initiated interview must be requested via a PTOL-413A form and faxed to the Examiner's personal fax phone number: (571) 273-8046. Furthermore, Applicant is invited to contact the Examiner via email (suresh.memula@uspto.gov) on the condition the communication is pursuant to and in accordance with MPEP §502.03 and §713.01. The Examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday: 9am-6pm. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Jack Chiang, can be reached on 571-272-7483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned (i.e., central fax phone number) is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SURESH MEMULA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2851
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 16, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12759420
EV Charging Connector with Air Cooling, EV Charging System and Method
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12762319
DETERMINING THE LOCATION OF SAFETY MECHANISM WITHIN A CIRCUIT DESIGN
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761544
DISSECTION METHOD FOR OPTICAL PROXIMITY CORRECTION AND PATTERNING METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761545
METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING OPC LITHOGRAPHY MODEL PARAMETERS
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755081
CONFIGURATION OF PATTERNING PROCESS
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 942 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month