Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/336,333

ACCOUNTING FOR INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNIT BIAS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 16, 2023
Examiner
SILVA, MICHAEL THOMAS
Art Unit
3663
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
The Boeing Company
OA Round
4 (Final)
33%
Grant Probability
At Risk
5-6
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 33% of cases
33%
Career Allowance Rate
38 granted / 115 resolved
-19.0% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
171
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§103
62.2%
+22.2% vs TC avg
§102
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 115 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment 1. Claims 1, 6-11, and 16-28 are currently pending. 2. Claims 2-5 and 12-15 are canceled. 3. Claims 1 and 11 are currently amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. 4. Claims 1, 6-11, and 16-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Any claim not specifically mentioned, including Claims 6-10 and 16-28, have been included based on its dependency. 5. Claim 1 recites the limitation "a measured system momentum H – J(ω+b)+h, determining a magnitude of the measured system momentum HTH=ǁHǁ2 in Lines 14-15. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. More specifically, it is unclear what the variables ω, b, and h are representing. Under the broadest reasonable interpretation, the variables are interpreted as any variable used to determine a measured system momentum. Claim 11 has the same limitations as Claim 1 except for it is a separate independent claim but is rejected for the same reasoning. Response to Arguments 6. Applicant’s arguments, see Pages 7-9, filed 5/29/2026, with respect to the U.S.C. 103 rejections have been fully considered and are persuasive. The U.S.C. 103 rejections of Claims 1, 6-11, and 16-28 have been withdrawn. Allowable Subject Matter 7. Claims 1 and 11 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b), set forth in this Office action. 8. Claims 6-10 and 16-28 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if the independent claims are rewritten or amended to overcome their own rejections. 9. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Independent Claim 1 contains allowable subject matter as the closest prior art references do not teach or render and obvious combination for the following limitations: “determining, based on the readings from the inertial measurement unit, a rigid body inertia J, and the outputs of the internal momentum storage device, a measured system momentum H = J(ω +b)+h, determining a magnitude of the measured system momentum HTH=ǁHǁ2, computing a residual between a predicted magnitude of system momentum and the magnitude of the measured system momentum, and updating the estimate of bias of magnitude of momentum and estimates of bias of directional rotational rates based on the residual.” Independent Claim 11 contains allowable subject matter as the closest prior art references do not teach or render and obvious combination for the following limitations: “determining, based on the readings from the inertial measurement unit, a rigid body inertia J, and the outputs of the internal momentum storage device, a measured system momentum H = J(ω +b)+h, determining a magnitude of the measured system momentum HTH=ǁHǁ2, computing a residual between a predicted magnitude of system momentum and the magnitude of the measured system momentum, and updating the estimate of bias of magnitude of momentum and estimates of bias of directional rotational rates based on the residual.” Conclusion 10. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 11. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL T SILVA whose telephone number is (571)272-6506. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Tues: 7AM - 4:30PM ET; Wed-Thurs: 7AM-6PM ET; Fri: OFF. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Ortiz can be reached at 571-272-1206. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL T SILVA/Examiner, Art Unit 3663 /ANGELA Y ORTIZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 8 earlier events
Dec 22, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 28, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 28, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
May 29, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743959
Spaceborne Neural Network for Unmanned Traffic Management
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12716737
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING MAP DATA
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12653100
RESIDUE SPREAD MONITORING
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12617372
Systems And Methods For Enhanced Vehicle Valet Mode
4y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12505735
ACTIVE QUEUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
33%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (+23.9%)
3y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 115 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month