Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/337,279

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING AND UTILIZING A TRUST INDICATION IN MOBILE NETWORKS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 19, 2023
Examiner
MIAH, LITON
Art Unit
2642
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
488 granted / 650 resolved
+13.1% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
684
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
53.0%
+13.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 650 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This Action is in response to amendment filed on November 20, 2025. Claims 1-7, 10-13 and 15-20 are still pending in the present application. This Action is made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7, 10-13 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by “3rd Generation Partnership Project;” 3GPP TR 23.700-81 (Release 18) (hereinafter 3GPP). Regarding claim 1, 3GPP discloses an apparatus for trust security in mobile networks, the apparatus comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to: collect information on messages exchanged between a first mobile network and a second mobile network during a time period (page 47 figure 6.10.2-1 [step 2 collects data]; also see page 38 [step 9]); and determine a trust indication of the first mobile network at least based on the collected information period (see at least page 37 [step 3]), wherein the trust indication comprises a trust score, which indicates a trust metric of the first mobile network (see at least page 36 [section 6.7.1]), the trust indication further comprises at least one of: the time period, a validity period of the trust indication, or information on fluctuation of the trust score over the time period (see at least page 36 [section 6.7.1]), and wherein the trust indication of the first mobile network indicates a level of trustworthiness of the first mobile network (see at least page 36 second to last paragraph and also see page 124 [step 7]). Regarding claim 2, 3GPP discloses receive from a network entity, a request for the trust indication of the first mobile network; in response to the request, determine the trust indication of the first mobile network; and provide the determined trust indication to the network entity (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 3, 3GPP discloses caused to perform one or more of the following operations: updating a trust indication of the first mobile network with the determined trust indication; sending the trust indication to a network entity; or storing the trust indication in a database (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 4, 3GPP discloses the network entity is any of: a security edge protection proxy, SEPP; a united data management, UDM, entity; a steering of roaming, SoR, entity; a network repository function, NRF, entity; an operation, administration and management, OAM, entity; or a federated learning aggregator (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 5, 3GPP discloses analyze exceptions related to the first network occurred during the time period; and wherein the trust indication is determined further based on information on the exceptions (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 6, 3GPP discloses further caused to obtain the trust indication of the first mobile network from a database (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 7, 3GPP discloses wherein the collected information on message exchanges comprises information on at least one of: an inter-network control signaling communicated between a first network function belonging to the first mobile network and a second network function belonging to the second mobile network, or a key performance indicator associated with failures in the first network (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 10, 3GPP discloses the first mobile network is a public land mobile network, PLMN, or a non-public network, NPN (see at least page 48 [section 6.10.2]). Regarding claim 11, 3GPP discloses the apparatus is deployed in at least one of the following: a network analytics function entity; a network security entity; or a network function entity (see at least page 48 [section 6.10.2]). Regarding claim 12, 3GPP discloses an apparatus for trust security in mobile networks, the apparatus comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to: obtain a trust indication of a first mobile network, which indicates a level of trustworthiness of the first mobile network (page 47 figure 6.10.2-1 [step 2 collects data]; also see page 38 [step 9]); wherein the trust indication comprises a trust score, which indicates a trust metric of the first mobile network (see at least page 36 [section 6.7.1]), the trust indication further comprises at least one of: the time period, a validity period of the trust indication, or information on fluctuation of the trust score over the time period (see at least page 36 [section 6.7.1]), and perform at least one of: configure a roaming operation related to the first mobile network based on the trust indication; or utilize the trust indication for a network operation related to at least one network function entity of the first mobile network (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 13, 3GPP discloses when executed to configure the roaming operation, the apparatus is caused to perform at least one of: configure a prioritized list of preferred mobile networks for roaming based on the trust indication; or select the first mobile network as a visited mobile network based on the trust indication (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 15, 3GPP discloses the apparatus is deployed in any of: a security edge protection proxy, SEPP; a united data management, UDM, function entity; a steering of roaming, SoR; or any network function entity (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 16, 3GPP discloses when executed to utilize the trust indication for a network operation, the apparatus is caused to perform at least one of: filtering or blocking traffic coming from the at least one network function entity, in a case that the trust indication indicates a lower level of trustworthiness of the first mobile network (see at least page 36 second to last paragraph and also see page 124 [step 7]). Regarding claim 17, 3GPP discloses an apparatus for trust security in mobile networks, the apparatus comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to: obtain a trust indication of a first network function entity in a second mobile network (page 47 figure 6.10.2-1 [step 2 collects data]; also see page 38 [step 9]), wherein the trust indication indicates a level of trustworthiness of the first network function entity (see at least page 36 [section 6.7.1]); wherein the trust indication comprises a trust score, which indicates a trust metric of the first mobile network (see at least page 36 [section 6.7.1]), the trust indication further comprises at least one of: the time period, a validity period of the trust indication, or information on fluctuation of the trust score over the time period (see at least page 36 [section 6.7.1]), and utilize the trust indication for a network operation related to the first network function entity (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 18, 3GPP discloses caused to utilize the trust indication by: decommissioning the first network function entity, in a case that the trust indication indicates a lower level of trustworthiness of the first network function entity (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 19, 3GPP discloses receive a discovery request or an access token request from another network function entity; and select the first network function entity to respond to the request, based on the trust indication (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Regarding claim 20, 3GPP discloses the apparatus is deployed in any of the following network entities in a second mobile network which is different from the first mobile network: a network repository function, NRF, entity; an operation, administration and management, OAM, function entity; an application function, AP, entity; or any other network function entity (see at least page 37 [section 6.7.2.1]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed on November 20, 2025 have been fully considered. Applicant’s arguments are not persuasive in regards to the 35 USC § 102 rejections as the claim is currently written. Arguments and corresponding examiner’s responses are shown below for Claim 1. The same arguments are valid for the Claim 1 and the similar features of other independent claims. Argument: The Applicant argues on pages 8-11 that 3GPP does not disclose “the trust indication comprises a trust score, which indicates a trust metric of the first mobile network, the trust indication further comprises at least one of: the time period, a validity period of the trust indication, or information on fluctuation of the trust score over the time period” of independent claim 1 and similar feature in independent claims 12 and 17. According to applicant score associated to the NWDAF Analytics and ML models is not over period of time. Response: Examiner respectfully disagrees because 3GPP teaches “the trust indication comprises a trust score, which indicates a trust metric of the first mobile network, the trust indication further comprises at least one of: the time period, a validity period of the trust indication, or information on fluctuation of the trust score over the time period”. As stated in the previous office action, section 6.3.1 discloses the score associated to the NWDAF analytics and ML models; page 36 [6.7.1] discloses rating of ML models and NWDAF analytics; page 37 [fig. 6.7.2.1-1] discloses NWDAF contains a metric that should be utilized to rate the analytics service, wherein metric associated with analytics ID; the metric associated with the NWDAF analytics and ML models are subscribed for duration [step 9]; wherein subscription duration is considered as the time period. Additionally on page 94 [step 9] discloses NWDAF subscription response with validity period. Furthermore, page 62 [table 6.16.1.2-1] discloses validity period for application service experience analytics. Therefore, 3GPP teaches the above limitation. Conclusion Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LITON MIAH whose telephone number is (571)270-3124. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 7:30am -5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rafael Perez-Gutierrez can be reached on 571-272-7915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LITON MIAH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 19, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 20, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593352
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RANDOM ACCESS CHANNEL RESOURCE DETERMINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586107
DOCUMENT OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581296
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER AUTHENTICATION USING MOBILE NETWORK DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12556893
DIGITAL TWIN INCIDENT RESPONSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12557144
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+21.5%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 650 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month