Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/337,364

Fastener Assembly for Vehicle

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 19, 2023
Examiner
MERCADO, LOUIS A
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
529 granted / 666 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
709
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§102
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 666 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 1, claims 1-5 and 7-20 in the reply filed on 01/06/2026 is acknowledged. Claim 6 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 7-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tuma (US Patent No. 10,144,366). Regarding claim 1, Tuma discloses a fastener assembly for a vehicle, the fastener assembly comprising: a first member coupled to a vehicle trim and comprising a first coupling protrusion on a surface of the first member directed toward a panel (see annotated Fig. 1); and a second member coupled to the panel and comprising a second coupling protrusion on a surface of the second member directed toward the vehicle trim, the second coupling protrusion being coupled to the first coupling protrusion, wherein the first member and the second member are coupled to each other by coupling of the first coupling protrusion and the second coupling protrusion (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 2, Tuma discloses, where: the first coupling protrusion comprises: a first stem protruding from the first member (see annotated Fig. 1); and a first head disposed at an end of the first stem and having a larger width than the first stem (see annotated Fig. 1); and the second coupling protrusion comprises: a second stem protruding from the second member (see annotated Fig. 1); and a second head disposed at an end of the second stem and having a larger width than the second stem (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 3, Tuma discloses, wherein: the first coupling protrusion comprises a plurality of first coupling protrusions arranged on the first member at predetermined intervals (see annotated Fig. 1); and the second coupling protrusion comprises a plurality of second coupling protrusions arranged on the second member at intervals equal to the intervals at which the first coupling protrusions are arranged (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 4, Tuma discloses, wherein a gap between the heads of adjacent first coupling protrusions is smaller than a width of the head of each of the second coupling protrusions. Regarding claim 7, Tuma discloses a fastener assembly for a vehicle, the fastener assembly comprising: a first member coupled to a vehicle trim and comprising a first coupling protrusion on a surface of the first member directed toward a panel; and a second member coupled to the panel, the second member comprising: a second coupling protrusion on a first surface of the second member directed toward the vehicle trim, the second coupling protrusion being coupled to the first coupling protrusion, wherein the first member and the second member are coupled to each other by coupling of the first coupling protrusion to the second coupling protrusion; and a fastening part on a second surface of the second member opposite the first surface of the second member, wherein the second member is coupled to an assembling hole in the panel by the fastening part (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 8, Tuma discloses, wherein the fastening part comprises: a base having a first end connected to the second member (see annotated Figs. 1 and 3); and a fixing portion disposed at an outer portion of the base and directed toward an exterior of the second member (see annotated Figs. 1 and 3). Regarding claim 9, Tuma discloses, wherein: the fastening part comprises: a pair of bases disposed to be horizontally symmetric, each of the bases having a first end connected to the second member (see annotated Figs. 1 and 3); a pair of fixing portions disposed to be horizontally symmetric at outer portions of the pair of bases, respectively, wherein the fixing portions are directed toward an exterior of the second member (see annotated Figs. 1 and 3); and the fastening part is configured to be elastically deformed while passing through the assembling hole, restored after passing through the assembling hole, and caught by a periphery of the assembling hole, such that the second member is fixed to the panel (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 10, Tuma discloses, wherein the fastening part is elastically deformed in a plane parallel to the panel (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 11, Tuma discloses, wherein the fastening part is elastically deformed to pass through the assembling hole or restored after passing through the assembling hole by the base rotating parallel to the panel around a portion connected to the second member (see annotated Figs. 1 and 3, and Fig. 6). Regarding claim 12, Tuma discloses, wherein the pair of the bases and the pair of the fixing portions are configured to pass through the assembling hole by rotating parallel to the panel in a direction of gathering together and are configured to be restored by rotating parallel to the panel after passing through the assembling hole (see annotated Figs. 1 and 3, and Fig. 6). Regarding claim 13, Tuma discloses, wherein the fastening part is downwardly inclined toward the second member toward two opposite ends of the second member (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 14, Tuma further discloses, comprising a first stopper and a second stopper on the second member, wherein the first stopper and the second stopper are spaced apart from each other, and configured to restrict a movement of the second member after the fastening part is coupled to the assembling hole (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 15, Tuma discloses, wherein the first stopper protrudes from the second member and is connected to an upper end of the fastening part, and wherein a width of the first stopper corresponds to a width of the assembling hole (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 16, Tuma discloses, wherein the second stopper protrudes from the second member at a position spaced apart from the first stopper at an interval (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 17, Tuma further discloses, comprising: a catching portion on the second stopper and extending from an upper end of the second stopper toward the first stopper (see annotated Fig. 1); and a planar portion on one of the fixing portions, wherein the planar portion is parallel to the second member and positioned below the catching portion (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 18, Tuma discloses a fastener assembly for a vehicle, the fastener assembly comprising: a first member coupled to a vehicle trim and comprising a first coupling protrusion on a surface of the first member directed toward a panel (see annotated Fig. 1); a second member coupled to the panel and comprising a second coupling protrusion on a surface of the second member directed toward the vehicle trim, the second coupling protrusion being coupled to the first coupling protrusion, wherein the first member and the second member are coupled to each other by coupling of the first coupling protrusion to the second coupling protrusion (see annotated Fig. 1); and a sealing member fitted with a periphery of the first member or the second member and configured to seal a portion between the first member and the vehicle trim or a portion between the second member and the panel (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 19, Tuma discloses, wherein the sealing member comprises: a through-hole with which the periphery of the first member or the periphery of the second member is fitted (see annotated Fig. 1); and a sealing portion extending from a portion where the through-hole is provided and configured to adjoin the vehicle trim or the panel (see annotated Fig. 1). Regarding claim 20, Tuma discloses, wherein the sealing member is fitted with the periphery of the second member and is configured to seal the portion between the second member and the panel (see annotated Fig. 1). PNG media_image1.png 424 642 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 273 400 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tuma (US Patent No. 10,144,366), in view of Morris et al. (US Patent No. 9,429,176). Regarding claim 5, Tuma discloses the claimed invention except for the first member comprises a plurality of fastening holes, and wherein the fastening holes are penetrated by ribs protruding from the vehicle trim. However, Morris et al. teaches a member comprises a plurality of fastening holes (204), and wherein the fastening holes (204) are penetrated by ribs (106) protruding from the vehicle trim (see Fig. 1). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the first member from Tuma with a plurality of fastening holes in order to mechanically secure the first member to the vehicle trim with ribs as taught by Morris et al. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LOUIS A MERCADO whose telephone number is (571)270-5388. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason W. San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LOUIS A. MERCADO/ Examiner Art Unit 3677 /JASON W SAN/SPE, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 19, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599246
BED SHEET RETENTION SYSTEMS, SYSTEM COMPONENTS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12569038
GARMENTS WITH SEMI-PRECIOUS STONE SNAPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557883
SYSTEM FOR INTERLOCKING FASTENER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553495
CORD STOPPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12540639
Fastening Clip
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+17.9%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 666 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month