DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Arguments
Due to the Applicant’s amendments to the specification, the objection of specification has been withdrawn.
Applicant's arguments have been fully considered but they are not persuasive:
Applicant argues in section titled “ Claim Rejections” on pages 10-12 with respect to independent claim 1: “the cited portion of Zorguias do not disclose receive, from a network entity, a report based on the sensing operation performed by the network entity”.
In response to Applicant’s arguments, the Examiner respectfully disagrees because Zorgui discloses in ( see ¶[0005], a user equipment (UE) receiving a configuration for radar waveform reporting from a network node…the UE may transmit a radar reporting message to the network node according to the received configuration; ¶[0093], UE 115-c may emit sensing signal 275. As shown, sensing signal 275 may collide with object 215. In some cases, at least a portion of sensing signal 275 may reflect off of object 215; ¶[0094], UE 115-c may emit sensing signal 285. As shown, sensing signal 285 may collide with object 220. In some cases, at least a portion of sensing signal 285 may reflect off of object 220; ¶[0095], UE 115-b may transmit, via communication 260, the radar reporting message associated with reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both, to base station 105-a). Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181,26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). The UE can be interpreted as a network entity under a broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI). Thus, Zorgui discloses the limitation “receive, from a network entity, a report based on the sensing operation performed by the network entity”.
Applicant further argues that “the cited portion of Zorguias do not disclose an electromagnetic profile associated with an environment”. The Examiner respectfully disagrees because Zorgui discloses see (¶[0025] A method of wireless communication at a network node is described. The method may include transmitting, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receiving, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determining location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform; ¶[0083], a first UE (e.g., a first UE 115 of FIG. 1) may receive a configuration for radar waveform reporting from a network node (e.g., a base station 105 or a second UE 115 of FIG. 1). In some cases, the radar waveform reporting may provide object detection for one or more objects within a detectable range of the first UE. In some examples, the first UE may receive a radar waveform (e.g., a radar waveform reflected off an object of the one or more objects). In some examples, the first UE may transmit a radar reporting message to the network node according to the received configuration. In some cases, the radar reporting message may include an indication of the received radar waveform; ¶[0095] radar reporting message). The waveform reporting is electromagnetic profile of the environment. Thus, Zorgui discloses an electromagnetic profile associated with an environment. Therefore, the Examiner maintains the rejection.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1, 6, 8, 13, 15, and 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zorgui (US 2022/0099796 A1).
Regarding claim 1, Zorgui teaches: A network configured to support one or more sensing operations ( see ¶[0002], The following relates to wireless communications, including waveform reporting for cooperative sensing; ¶[0191], FIG. 16 shows a diagram of a system 1600 including a device 1605 that supports waveform reporting for cooperative sensing in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure. The device 1605 may be an example of or include the components of device 1305, device 1405, or a base station 105), the network including:
at least one processor (FIG. 16, Processor (1640)); and
a memory coupled to the at least one processor (FIG. 16, Memory (1630) ), wherein the at least one processor is configured to:
initiate transmission of a configuration associated with a sensing operation ( see ¶[0005], the described techniques provide for a user equipment (UE) receiving a configuration for radar waveform reporting from a network node. In some cases, the radar waveform reporting may provide object detection for one or more objects within a detectable range of the UE; ¶[0025]; ¶[0192], transmit, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receive, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determine location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform); and
receive, from a network entity, a report based on the sensing operation performed by the network entity and that indicates an electromagnetic profile associated with an environment ( see ¶[0005], the UE may transmit a radar reporting message to the network node according to the received configuration. In some cases, the radar reporting message may include an indication of the received radar waveform; ¶[0083]; ¶[0093], UE 115-c may emit sensing signal 275. As shown, sensing signal 275 may collide with object 215. In some cases, at least a portion of sensing signal 275 may reflect off of object 215. As shown, at least a portion of sensing signal 275 may reflect back towards UE 115-c. In some cases, a portion of sensing signal 275 reflected off of object 215 may include reflected signal 280. In some cases, reflected signal 280 may be received by UE 115-c; ¶[0094],UE 115-c may emit sensing signal 285. As shown, sensing signal 285 may collide with object 220. In some cases, at least a portion of sensing signal 285 may reflect off of object 220. As shown, at least a portion of sensing signal 285 may reflect back towards UE 115-c. In some cases, a portion of sensing signal 285 reflected off of object 220 may include reflected signal 290. In some cases, reflected signal 290 may be received by UE 115-c; ¶[0095], UE 115-c may analyze one or more aspects of reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both. In some cases, UE 115-c may generate a radar reporting message based on the analysis of reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both. In some cases, the radar reporting message may include one or more indications of reflected signal 280 based on the analysis of reflected signal 280…UE 115-c may transmit, via communication 295, the radar reporting message associated with reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both, to UE 115-b. In some cases, UE 115-b may transmit, via communication 260, the radar reporting message associated with reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both, to base station 105-a; ).
Regarding claim 6, Zorgui teaches: The network of claim 1, wherein the electromagnetic profile indicates a radio frequency (RF) profile of the environment (¶[0192], transmit, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receive, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determine location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform), a physical layout of the environment, multipath characterization of the environment, or a combination thereof, and wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: identify a target in the environment based on the report ( see ¶[0125], In some cases, the network device may analyze the combined data received from all of the receiving nodes. In some cases, the network device may perform additional functionalities (e.g., tracking of one or more objects, identifying a particular object and tracking the identified object, etc.) based on the analysis of the combined data ), and wherein: the target includes a stationary object positioned within the environment ( see Figure 2; ¶[0085], environment 200 includes base station 105-a, UE 115-a, UE 115-b, UE 115-c, object 205, object 210, object 215, and object 220. In some examples, the environment 200 may provide monostatic radar, bi-static radar, and multi-static radar; ¶[0125], In some cases, the network device may analyze the combined data received from all of the receiving nodes. In some cases, the network device may perform additional functionalities (e.g., tracking of one or more objects, identifying a particular object and tracking the identified object, etc.) based on the analysis of the combined data ), the target includes a mobile object within the environment, or a combination thereof.
Regarding claim 8, Zorgui teaches: A method, performed by a network, to support one or more sensing operations ( see ¶[0002], The following relates to wireless communications, including waveform reporting for cooperative sensing; ¶[0191], FIG. 16 shows a diagram of a system 1600 including a device 1605 that supports waveform reporting for cooperative sensing in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure. The device 1605 may be an example of or include the components of device 1305, device 1405, or a base station 105), the method comprising:
initiating transmission of a configuration associated with a sensing operation ( see ¶[0005], the described techniques provide for a user equipment (UE) receiving a configuration for radar waveform reporting from a network node. In some cases, the radar waveform reporting may provide object detection for one or more objects within a detectable range of the UE; ¶[0025]; ¶[0192], transmit, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receive, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determine location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform); and
receiving, from a network entity, a report based on the sensing operation performed by the network entity and that indicates an electromagnetic profile associated with an environment ( see ¶[0005], the UE may transmit a radar reporting message to the network node according to the received configuration. In some cases, the radar reporting message may include an indication of the received radar waveform; ¶[0083]; ¶[0093], UE 115-c may emit sensing signal 275. As shown, sensing signal 275 may collide with object 215. In some cases, at least a portion of sensing signal 275 may reflect off of object 215. As shown, at least a portion of sensing signal 275 may reflect back towards UE 115-c. In some cases, a portion of sensing signal 275 reflected off of object 215 may include reflected signal 280. In some cases, reflected signal 280 may be received by UE 115-c; ¶[0094],UE 115-c may emit sensing signal 285. As shown, sensing signal 285 may collide with object 220. In some cases, at least a portion of sensing signal 285 may reflect off of object 220. As shown, at least a portion of sensing signal 285 may reflect back towards UE 115-c. In some cases, a portion of sensing signal 285 reflected off of object 220 may include reflected signal 290. In some cases, reflected signal 290 may be received by UE 115-c; ¶[0095], UE 115-c may analyze one or more aspects of reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both. In some cases, UE 115-c may generate a radar reporting message based on the analysis of reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both. In some cases, the radar reporting message may include one or more indications of reflected signal 280 based on the analysis of reflected signal 280…UE 115-c may transmit, via communication 295, the radar reporting message associated with reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both, to UE 115-b. In some cases, UE 115-b may transmit, via communication 260, the radar reporting message associated with reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both, to base station 105-a).
Regarding claim 13, Zorgui teaches: The method of claim 8, wherein the electromagnetic profile indicates a radio frequency (RF) profile of the environment (¶[0192], transmit, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receive, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determine location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform), a physical layout of the environment, or a combination thereof, and wherein the method further comprises: identifying a target in the environment based on the report ( see ¶[0125], In some cases, the network device may analyze the combined data received from all of the receiving nodes. In some cases, the network device may perform additional functionalities (e.g., tracking of one or more objects, identifying a particular object and tracking the identified object, etc.) based on the analysis of the combined data ), and wherein: the target includes a stationary object positioned within the environment ( see Figure 2; ¶[0085], environment 200 includes base station 105-a, UE 115-a, UE 115-b, UE 115-c, object 205, object 210, object 215, and object 220. In some examples, the environment 200 may provide monostatic radar, bi-static radar, and multi-static radar; ¶[0125], In some cases, the network device may analyze the combined data received from all of the receiving nodes. In some cases, the network device may perform additional functionalities (e.g., tracking of one or more objects, identifying a particular object and tracking the identified object, etc.) based on the analysis of the combined data ), the target includes a mobile object within the environment, or a combination thereof.
Regarding claim 15, Zorgui teaches: A network entity configured to perform one or more sensing operations ( see ¶[0002], The following relates to wireless communications, including waveform reporting for cooperative sensing; ¶[0166], FIG. 12 shows a diagram of a system 1200 including a device 1205 that supports waveform reporting for cooperative sensing in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure. The device 1205 may be an example of or include the components of device 905, device 1005, or a UE 115 as described herein), the network entity including:
at least one processor (see FIG. 12, Processor (1240)); and
a memory coupled to the at least one processor (see FIG. 12, Memory (1230)), wherein the at least one processor is configured to:
receive a configuration associated with a sensing operation ( see ¶[0005], the described techniques provide for a user equipment (UE) receiving a configuration for radar waveform reporting from a network node. In some cases, the radar waveform reporting may provide object detection for one or more objects within a detectable range of the UE; ¶[0025]; ¶[0192], transmit, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receive, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determine location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform); and
initiate transmission of a report based on the sensing operation performed by the network entity and that indicates an electromagnetic profile associated with an environment ( see ¶[0005], the UE may transmit a radar reporting message to the network node according to the received configuration. In some cases, the radar reporting message may include an indication of the received radar waveform; ¶[0083]; ¶[0093], UE 115-c may emit sensing signal 275. As shown, sensing signal 275 may collide with object 215. In some cases, at least a portion of sensing signal 275 may reflect off of object 215. As shown, at least a portion of sensing signal 275 may reflect back towards UE 115-c. In some cases, a portion of sensing signal 275 reflected off of object 215 may include reflected signal 280. In some cases, reflected signal 280 may be received by UE 115-c; ¶[0094],UE 115-c may emit sensing signal 285. As shown, sensing signal 285 may collide with object 220. In some cases, at least a portion of sensing signal 285 may reflect off of object 220. As shown, at least a portion of sensing signal 285 may reflect back towards UE 115-c. In some cases, a portion of sensing signal 285 reflected off of object 220 may include reflected signal 290. In some cases, reflected signal 290 may be received by UE 115-c; ¶[0095], UE 115-c may analyze one or more aspects of reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both. In some cases, UE 115-c may generate a radar reporting message based on the analysis of reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both. In some cases, the radar reporting message may include one or more indications of reflected signal 280 based on the analysis of reflected signal 280…UE 115-c may transmit, via communication 295, the radar reporting message associated with reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both, to UE 115-b. In some cases, UE 115-b may transmit, via communication 260, the radar reporting message associated with reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both, to base station 105-a).
Regarding claim 23, Zorgui teaches: A method, performed by a network entity, to support one or more sensing operations, the method comprising:
receiving a configuration associated with a sensing operation ( see ¶[0005], the described techniques provide for a user equipment (UE) receiving a configuration for radar waveform reporting from a network node. In some cases, the radar waveform reporting may provide object detection for one or more objects within a detectable range of the UE; ¶[0025]; ¶[0192], transmit, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receive, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determine location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform); and
initiating transmission of a report based on the sensing operation performed by the network entity and that indicates an electromagnetic profile associated with an environment ( see ¶[0005], the UE may transmit a radar reporting message to the network node according to the received configuration. In some cases, the radar reporting message may include an indication of the received radar waveform; ¶[0083]; ¶[0093], UE 115-c may emit sensing signal 275. As shown, sensing signal 275 may collide with object 215. In some cases, at least a portion of sensing signal 275 may reflect off of object 215. As shown, at least a portion of sensing signal 275 may reflect back towards UE 115-c. In some cases, a portion of sensing signal 275 reflected off of object 215 may include reflected signal 280. In some cases, reflected signal 280 may be received by UE 115-c; ¶[0094],UE 115-c may emit sensing signal 285. As shown, sensing signal 285 may collide with object 220. In some cases, at least a portion of sensing signal 285 may reflect off of object 220. As shown, at least a portion of sensing signal 285 may reflect back towards UE 115-c. In some cases, a portion of sensing signal 285 reflected off of object 220 may include reflected signal 290. In some cases, reflected signal 290 may be received by UE 115-c; ¶[0095], UE 115-c may analyze one or more aspects of reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both. In some cases, UE 115-c may generate a radar reporting message based on the analysis of reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both. In some cases, the radar reporting message may include one or more indications of reflected signal 280 based on the analysis of reflected signal 280…UE 115-c may transmit, via communication 295, the radar reporting message associated with reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both, to UE 115-b. In some cases, UE 115-b may transmit, via communication 260, the radar reporting message associated with reflected signal 280 or reflected signal 290, or both, to base station 105-a).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention.
Claim(s) 2, 9, 17, and 25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zorgui (US 2022/0099796 A1) in view of Ali (WO 2022/107050 A1), IDS submitted on 10/31/2021.
Regarding claim 2, Zorgui teaches the network of claim 1. Zorgui, however, fails to explicitly teach information related to the configuration indicates a format of the report, the format indicates reporting per resource and the resource corresponds to a scan signal.
However, Ali, in the same or similar field of endeavor teaches: the network of claim 1, wherein: the configuration indicates a format of the report, the format indicates reporting per resource, aggregated reporting across a plurality of resources, or a combination thereof, and the resource corresponds to a scan signal ( see Ali, claim 15, reporting the radar-sensing information comprises one of: reporting after each measurement or reporting a combined report after multiple measurements; ¶[0083], The gNB may configure the UEs to perform repetition of radar signal transmission/reception and report the time information after each period or report a combined/averaged measurement information after multiple repetitions).
It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zorgui's teachings with Ali's above teaching, for identifying and localizing radio blockages via radar sensing ( see Ali, ¶[0004] ). Known work in one field of endeavor (Ali prior art) may prompt variations of it for use in either the same field or different one (Zorgui prior art) based on design incentives ( identifying and localizing radio blockages via radar sensing ) or other market forces if the variations are predictable to one or ordinary skill in the art.
Regarding claim 9, Zorgui teaches the method of claim 8. Zorgui, however, fails to explicitly teach information related to the configuration indicates a format of the report, the format indicates reporting per resource, aggregated reporting across a plurality of resources, or a combination thereof, and the resource corresponds to a scan signal.
However, Ali, in the same or similar field of endeavor teaches: The method of claim 8, wherein: the configuration indicates a format of the report, the format indicates reporting per resource, aggregated reporting across a plurality of resources, or a combination thereof, and the resource corresponds to a scan signal ( see Ali, claim 15, reporting the radar-sensing information comprises one of: reporting after each measurement or reporting a combined report after multiple measurements; ¶[0083], The gNB may configure the UEs to perform repetition of radar signal transmission/reception and report the time information after each period or report a combined/averaged measurement information after multiple repetitions).
It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zorgui's teachings with Ali's above teaching, for identifying and localizing radio blockages via radar sensing ( see Ali, ¶[0004] ). Known work in one field of endeavor (Ali prior art) may prompt variations of it for use in either the same field or different one (Zorgui prior art) based on design incentives ( identifying and localizing radio blockages via radar sensing ) or other market forces if the variations are predictable to one or ordinary skill in the art.
Regarding claim 17, Zorgui teaches the network entity of claim 15. Zorgui, however, fails to explicitly teach information related to the configuration indicates a format of the report, the format indicates reporting per resource, aggregated reporting across a plurality of resources, or a combination thereof, and the resource corresponds to a scan signal.
However, Ali, in the same or similar field of endeavor teaches: The network entity of claim 15, wherein: the configuration indicates a format of the report, the format indicates reporting per resource, aggregated reporting across a plurality of resources, or a combination thereof, and the resource corresponds to a scan signal ( see Ali, claim 15, reporting the radar-sensing information comprises one of: reporting after each measurement or reporting a combined report after multiple measurements; ¶[0083], The gNB may configure the UEs to perform repetition of radar signal transmission/reception and report the time information after each period or report a combined/averaged measurement information after multiple repetitions).
It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zorgui's teachings with Ali's above teaching, for identifying and localizing radio blockages via radar sensing ( see Ali, ¶[0004] ). Known work in one field of endeavor (Ali prior art) may prompt variations of it for use in either the same field or different one (Zorgui prior art) based on design incentives ( identifying and localizing radio blockages via radar sensing ) or other market forces if the variations are predictable to one or ordinary skill in the art.
Regarding claim 25, Zorgui teaches the method of claim 23. Zorgui, however, fails to explicitly teach information related to the configuration indicates a format of the report, the format indicates reporting per resource, aggregated reporting across a plurality of resources, or a combination thereof, and the resource corresponds to a scan signal.
However, Ali, in the same or similar field of endeavor teaches: The method of claim 23, wherein: the configuration indicates a format of the report, the format indicates reporting per resource, aggregated reporting across a plurality of resources, or a combination thereof, and the resource corresponds to a scan signal ( see Ali, claim 15, reporting the radar-sensing information comprises one of: reporting after each measurement or reporting a combined report after multiple measurements; ¶[0083], The gNB may configure the UEs to perform repetition of radar signal transmission/reception and report the time information after each period or report a combined/averaged measurement information after multiple repetitions).
It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zorgui's teachings with Ali's above teaching, for identifying and localizing radio blockages via radar sensing ( see Ali, ¶[0004] ). Known work in one field of endeavor (Ali prior art) may prompt variations of it for use in either the same field or different one (Zorgui prior art) based on design incentives ( identifying and localizing radio blockages via radar sensing ) or other market forces if the variations are predictable to one or ordinary skill in the art.
Claim(s) 16 and 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zorgui (US 2022/0099796 A1) in view of Li ( US 2024/0353523 A1).
Regarding claim 16, Zorgui teaches: The network entity of claim 15, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: perform a sensing operation (¶[0192], transmit, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receive, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determine location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform);
identify an object positioned within the environment based on the sensing operation (¶[0192], transmit, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receive, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determine location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform); and
determine a path to the object, the path corresponds to a direction of the object relative to the network entity and a distance separating the object and the network entity.
Zorgui, however, fails to explicitly teach information related to determine a path to the object, the path corresponds to a direction of the object relative to the network entity and a distance separating the object and the network entity.
However, Li, in the same or similar field of endeavor teaches: determine a path to the object, the path corresponds to a direction of the object relative to the network entity and a distance separating the object and the network entity ( see Li, ¶[0116]- ¶[0117], ¶[0133]- ¶[0136], ¶[0156], ¶[0174], ¶[0192], ¶[0203]- ¶[0204], ¶[0284]-¶[030]).
It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combination with Li's above teachings to improve positioning accuracy (¶[0056]). Known work in one field of endeavor (Li prior art) may prompt variations of it for use in either the same field or different one (Zorgui prior art) based on design incentives ( improve positioning accuracy ) or other market forces if the variations are predictable to one or ordinary skill in the art.
Regarding claim 24, Zorgui teaches: The method of claim 23, further including: performing a sensing operation (¶[0192], transmit, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receive, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determine location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform); identifying an object positioned within the environment based on the sensing operation (¶[0192], transmit, to a UE, a configuration for radar waveform reporting, receive, from the UE according to the transmitted configuration, an indication of one or more parameter values associated with a radar waveform received at the UE, and determine location information for one or more objects based on the received indication of the one or more parameter values associated with the received radar waveform); and
determining a path to the object, the path corresponds to a direction of the object relative to the network entity and a distance separating the object and the network entity.
Zorgui, however, fails to explicitly teach information related to determining a path to the object, the path corresponds to a direction of the object relative to the network entity and a distance separating the object and the network entity.
However, Li, in the same or similar field of endeavor teaches: determining a path to the object, the path corresponds to a direction of the object relative to the network entity and a distance separating the object and the network entity ( see Li, ¶[0116]- ¶[0117], ¶[0133]- ¶[0136], ¶[0156], ¶[0174], ¶[0192], ¶[0203]-¶[0204], ¶[0284]-¶[030]).
It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combination with Li's above teachings to improve positioning accuracy (Li, ¶[0056]). Known work in one field of endeavor (Li prior art) may prompt variations of it for use in either the same field or different one (Zorgui prior art) based on design incentives ( improve positioning accuracy ) or other market forces if the variations are predictable to one or ordinary skill in the art.
Examiner's Note:
Examiner has cited particular paragraphs or columns and line numbers in the
references applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the
specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to specific
limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is
respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner.
Allowable Subject Matter
Claim(s) 3-5,7,10-12,14,18-22, and 26-30 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure.
Walker et al. ( US 2025/0093487 A1) discloses systems and methods for providing sensing capability in a wireless communication system, wherein a part of the communication spectrum is configured for a period of time to enable performing sensing by establishing a distributed sensing system between a base station (100) or terminal device, as transmitter device, and a terminal device (120) or base station, as receiver device,
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANG BOI THAWNG whose telephone number is (703)756-4751. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 am - 5:00 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at (571)272-3795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/MANG BOI THAWNG/Examiner, Art Unit 2476 /AYAZ R SHEIKH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2476
Prosecution Insights