Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/338,497

VENTED SYRINGE ADAPTER WITH BULB

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jun 21, 2023
Examiner
PONTON, JAMES D
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Cardinal Health Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
449 granted / 560 resolved
+10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
588
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 560 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 9-11 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected method, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 4/29/26. Claim Objections Claims 12-20 are objected to because of the following informalities: As to claim 12, “wherein the plunger and the barrel cooperatively defining a syringe volume” in lines 4-5 is grammatically incorrect and should likely read “wherein the plunger and the barrel cooperatively define a syringe volume”. Dependent claims inherit the deficiencies of the claims from which they depend. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-8, 18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 introduces “A syringe adapter for coupling with a syringe…” in the preamble, “an adapter body defining a fluid channel in fluid communication with the syringe” in line 3, “a vent channel in fluid communication with the syringe” in lines 4-5, and “a syringe portion configured to be coupled to the syringe” in line 7. The claim thus flip-flops between positively and non-positively referring to the syringe. It is unclear if applicant intends to claim the adapter in some intermediate state of being partially coupled with the syringe (if this is even possible). Assuming this is not the case, the examiner recommends making the language consistent as to whether the adapter is coupled to the syringe or is in a non-coupled state but configured to be coupled to the syringe. The examiner further notes that claim 7 and claim 8 non-positively refer to the syringe. Claim 18 recites “a cannula extending into the vent channel and configured to extend into the syringe” which is unclear because it recites the syringe in a non-positive state and as the examiner best understands, when the syringe is coupled with the syringe adapter (which is required in claim 12), then the cannula would be extended into the syringe and is therefore no longer in a state of being configured to extend into the syringe. Claim 20 recites “wherein the syringe comprises a syringe luer connector configured to couple to the adapter luer connector” which is unclear because it implies the syringe is not coupled to the adapter luer connector, which is contrary to claim 12. Dependent claims inherit the deficiencies of the claims from which they depend. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5-8, 12 and 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Greenland (US 4,576,594). As to claim 1, Greenland discloses a syringe adapter (32, 34; see Figs. 1-4) for coupling with a syringe (12), the syringe adapter comprising: an adapter body (32) defining a fluid channel (22) in fluid communication with the syringe and configured to permit medical fluid flow from the syringe through the syringe adapter (see para beginning line 21 col. 3) and a vent channel (24) in fluid communication with the syringe and configured to permit air flow into the syringe (see para beginning line 41 col. 3); a coupling portion (34) defining an adapter portion (lower, enlarged portion) configured to be coupled to the adapter body and a syringe portion (upper portion that includes ears 36) configured to be coupled to the syringe (see para beginning line 53 col. 3); and a bulb (10) coupled to the adapter body and defining a bulb volume, wherein the bulb volume is in fluid communication with the fluid channel and is movable between a collapsed configuration configured to displace air from the bulb volume and the fluid channel and an expanded configuration configured to draw medical fluid from the syringe into the fluid channel and bulb volume (see paragraph beginning line 5 col. 3; the chamber 10 is capable of being squeezed and thus capable of fulfilling the claimed functional limitations inasmuch as the instantly-described bulb). As to claim 5, Greenland discloses the syringe adapter of Claim 1, further comprising a check valve (44) in fluid communication with the vent channel, wherein the check valve is configured to permit air flow into the syringe and prevent medial fluid flow out of the vent channel (para beginning line 41 col. 3). As to claim 6, Greenland discloses the syringe adapter of Claim 5, wherein the check valve comprises a ball mechanism (Figs. 2, 4, para beginning line 41 col. 3). As to claim 7, Greenland discloses the syringe adapter of Claim 1, further comprising a cannula (20) extending into the vent channel and configured to extend into the syringe, wherein a cannula lumen of the cannula is in fluid communication with the vent channel (Figs. 2-4, paragraphs beginning line 28 col. 3 and line 67 col. 3). As to claim 8, Greenland discloses the syringe adapter of Claim 1, wherein the syringe portion of the coupling portion defines a luer connector configured to couple with the syringe (para beginning line 53 col. 3). As to claim 12, Greenland discloses an intravenous (IV) set (see Figs. 1-4), comprising: a syringe (12) comprising: a barrel (not numbered, but seen in Fig. 1); and a plunger (42) movably disposed in the barrel, wherein the plunger and the barrel cooperatively defining a syringe volume (interior of 12; see Fig. 1); and a syringe adapter (32, 34) comprising: an adapter body (32) defining a fluid channel (22) in fluid communication with the syringe volume and configured to permit medical fluid flow from the syringe volume through the syringe adapter (see para beginning line 21 col. 3) and a vent channel (24) in fluid communication with the syringe volume and configured to permit air flow into the syringe volume (see para beginning line 41 col. 3); a coupling portion (34) defining an adapter portion (lower, enlarged portion) coupled to the adapter body and a syringe portion (upper portion that includes ears 36) coupled to the syringe (see Figs. 1-2 and para beginning line 53 col. 3); and a bulb (10) coupled to the adapter body and defining a bulb volume, wherein the bulb volume is in fluid communication with the fluid channel and the syringe volume and is movable between a collapsed configuration configured to displace air from the bulb volume and the fluid channel and an expanded configuration configured to draw medical fluid from the syringe volume into the fluid channel and bulb volume (see paragraph beginning line 5 col. 3; the chamber 10 is capable of being squeezed and thus capable of fulfilling the claimed functional limitations inasmuch as the instantly-described bulb). As to claim 16, Greenland discloses the IV set of Claim 12, further comprising a check valve (44) in fluid communication with the vent channel, wherein the check valve is configured to permit air flow into the syringe volume and prevent medial fluid flow out of the vent channel (para beginning line 41 col. 3). As to claim 17, Greenland discloses the IV set of Claim 16, wherein the check valve comprises a ball mechanism (Figs. 2, 4, para beginning line 41 col. 3). As to claim 18, Greenland discloses the IV set of Claim 12, further comprising a cannula (20) extending into the vent channel and configured to extend into the syringe, wherein a cannula lumen of the cannula is in fluid communication with the vent channel (Figs. 2-4, paragraphs beginning line 28 col. 3 and line 67 col. 3). As to claim 19, Greenland discloses the IV set of Claim 12, wherein the syringe portion of the coupling portion defines an adapter luer connector (para beginning line 53 col. 3). As to claim 20, Greenland discloses the IV set of Claim 19, wherein the syringe comprises a syringe luer connector configured to couple to the adapter luer connector (para beginning line 53 col. 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-4 and 13-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Greenland in view of Burke (US 3,316,908). As to claims 2-4, Greenland discloses the syringe adapter of claim 1 as described above, but is silent to wherein the adapter body further defines a spike portion extending from the adapter body, wherein the fluid channel and the vent channel extend through the spike portion of the adapter body, and wherein the adapter portion of the coupling portion is configured to be coupled to the spike portion of the adapter body. Burke discloses an adapter body (20) that defines a spike portion (portion above shoulder portion 28; as seen in Figs. 3-4) extending from the adapter body (20), wherein the fluid channel (36) and the vent channel (40) extend through the spike portion of the adapter body (Figs. 3, 4), and wherein the adapter portion of the coupling portion is configured to be coupled to the spike portion of the adapter body (see para beginning line 48 col. 6). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Greenland in view of Burke such that the adapter body further defines a spike portion extending from the adapter body, wherein the fluid channel and the vent channel extend through the spike portion of the adapter body, and wherein the adapter portion of the coupling portion is configured to be coupled to the spike portion of the adapter body. One would have been motivated to do so in order to allow the adapter body to be inserted in the hole of an intravenous or blood bottle if desired (see para beginning line 21 col. 5 of Burke). As to claims 13-15, Greenland disclose the IV set of Claim 12 as described above, but is silent to wherein the adapter body further defines a spike portion extending from the adapter body, wherein the fluid channel and the vent channel extend through the spike portion of the adapter body, and wherein the adapter portion of the coupling portion is configured to be coupled to the spike portion of the adapter body. Burke discloses an adapter body (20) that defines a spike portion (portion above shoulder portion 28; as seen in Figs. 3-4) extending from the adapter body (20), wherein the fluid channel (36) and the vent channel (40) extend through the spike portion of the adapter body (Figs. 3, 4), and wherein the adapter portion of the coupling portion is configured to be coupled to the spike portion of the adapter body (see para beginning line 48 col. 6). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Greenland in view of Burke such that the adapter body further defines a spike portion extending from the adapter body, wherein the fluid channel and the vent channel extend through the spike portion of the adapter body, and wherein the adapter portion of the coupling portion is configured to be coupled to the spike portion of the adapter body. One would have been motivated to do so in order to allow the adapter body to be inserted in the hole of an intravenous or blood bottle if desired (see para beginning line 21 col. 5 of Burke). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to James D Ponton whose telephone number is (571)272-1001. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chelsea Stinson can be reached at 571-270-1744. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /James D Ponton/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 21, 2023
Application Filed
May 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678591
CATHETERS AND METHODS FOR MAKING THEM
4y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673165
PRECISION LOW-DOSE,LOW-WASTE SYRINGES AND ERGONOMIC ATTACHMENTS THEREFOR
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12661492
SANITIZING CAPS FOR MEDICAL CONNECTORS
5y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653992
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR TREATING A DISEASE WITH BIOTHERAPEUTICS
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653571
TAP BLOCK INJECTION DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.4%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 560 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month