Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/338,842

CONNECTORS FOR SMART WINDOWS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 21, 2023
Priority
Mar 16, 2011 — continuation of 8254013 +12 more
Examiner
MARTINEZ, JOSEPH P
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
View Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
769 granted / 895 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
907
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 895 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10-30-23 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 84-103 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being fully anticipated by Mullins et al. (US20160344148). The applied reference has a common appplicant with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. Re claim 84, Mullins et al. teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, an insulated glass unit (IGU) comprising: two panes (505 and para. 0054) comprising at least one optically switchable device (para. 0054); a spacer between (520), and sealed to, the two panes (para. 0054; fig. 3); and a plurality of connectors (525), at least one on each side of the IGU (fig. 5d), wherein the connectors are in electrical communication with the at least one optically switchable device (para. 0066), and configured to establish an electrical connection with a male connector (para. 0057). Re claim 85, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, at least one of the plurality of connectors comprises two or more pads (527). Re claim 86, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, a sealing area between the two panes (para. 0054). Re claim 87, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, the plurality of connectors are in the sealing area between the two panes (para. 0054). Re claim 88, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, the sealing area is a secondary seal outside the spacer (para. 0054). Re claim 89, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, a controller, configured to control the at least one optically switchable device, is disposed in the sealing area (para. 0056). Re claim 90, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, at least one wire in electrical communication with the plurality of connectors (522, 523), wherein at least one wire is in the sealing area and is configured to supply electricity to the at least one optically switchable device (para. 0054). Re claim 91, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, the at least one wire is in electrical communication with the at least one optically switchable device via one or more bus bars (515). Re claim 92, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, the at least one wire includes a ribbon cable (para. 0009). Re claim 93, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, the IGU is rectangular (fig. 5d) and the plurality of connectors comprises four female connectors (fig. 5d), at least one on each side of the IGU (fig. 5d) and in a sealing area between the two panes (para. 0054). Re claim 94, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, a controller external to the sealing area (para. 0065) and configured to mate with each of the plurality of connectors via a pigtail connector (para. 0052). Re claim 95, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, the controller is adjacent to the sealing area (para. 0160). Re claim 96, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, a pocket for housing a controller configured to control the at least one optically switchable device, wherein the controller is configured to electrically communicate with at least one of the plurality of connectors (para. 0131). Re claim 97, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, the at least one optically switchable device comprises an electrochromic device (para. 0006). Re claim 98, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, each of the plurality of connectors are configured to connect to a pigtail connector (para. 0052). Re claim 99, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, each of the plurality of connectors is configured to detachably connect to an end of a wire assembly, wherein the end of the wire assembly includes one or both of a memory device and an integrated circuit device (para. 0058). Re claim 100, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, the memory device and/or the integrated circuit device stores information for identifying and/or controlling the at least one optically switchable device (para. 0058). Re claim 101, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, the memory device and/or the integrated circuit device stores current and voltage operating instructions for transitioning the at least one optically switchable device between optical states (para. 0058). Re claim 102, Mullins et al. teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, an insulated glass unit (IGU) comprising: two panes (505 and para. 0054) comprising an electrochromic device (para. 0054); a spacer between (520), and sealed to, the two panes (para. 0054); and a plurality of first connectors (525; fig. 5d), at least one on each side of the IGU (fig. 5d), wherein each one of the first connectors is in electrical communication with the electrochromic device and configured to establish an electrical connection with a second connector of a wire assembly attachable to, or detachable from, the IGU (para. 0008). Re claim 103, Mullins et al. teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, a window assembly (fig. 3), comprising: a window controller (para. 0065); a wire assembly (545) in electrical communication with the window controller (para. 0065); and an insulated glass unit (IGU) (abstract) comprising: two panes (505 and para. 0054); an electrochromic device disposed between the two panes (para. 0054); a spacer (520) disposed between (para. 0054), and sealed to, the two panes (para. 0054); and a plurality of first connectors (525), wherein each one of the first connectors is in electrical communication with the electrochromic device and electrically connectable with a second connector of the wire assembly, and wherein the wire assembly is attachable to, or detachable from, the IGU (para. 0008). Re claim 104, Mullins et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5a, and 5d, the first connectors include at least two first connectors (fig. 5d), and wherein the at least two first connectors are positioned on opposite sides of the IGU from one another (fig. 5d). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH P MARTINEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-2335. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am to 7pm PACIFIC. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bumsuk Won can be reached at (571) 272-2713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Joseph P Martinez/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872 9-5-26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 21, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 20, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748286
IMAGING OPTICAL SYSTEM, IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE AND MOBILE TERMINAL
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748301
Color Changing Materials Arranged in Slow Particle Coloration Materials
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742949
IMAGING OPTICAL SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730310
HEAD-UP DISPLAY
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724224
METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING INITIAL STRUCTURE OF ATHERMAL OPTICAL SYSTEM BASED ON PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 895 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month