Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/339,180

COOLING ELEMENT FOR AN ELECTRIC COMPONENT, IN PARTICULAR FOR AN ELECTRIC BATTERY OF AN ELECTRIC OR HYBRID VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 21, 2023
Examiner
HINCAPIE SERNA, GUSTAVO A
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hutchinson S R L
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
239 granted / 405 resolved
-11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
443
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.1%
+7.1% vs TC avg
§102
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 405 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/16/2026 has been entered. Claims 1-2, 5, 7 and 9-16 are pending. Claims 1-2, 5, 10-12 and 14 are amended. Claims 3-4, 6 and 8 are cancelled. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the connectors comprising secondary tabs having respective indentations and the respective indentations provided in the pipe must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from claim 5. No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION. — The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 5, 7 and 9-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, in lines 10-15, it is unclear how the “each of the clip-type connectors” can comprise “at least one aperture in the pipe proximate one of the secondary apertures.” In line 15, it is unclear if the “at least one aperture” is one of the “two apertures” of line 3. For the purpose of this examination, the claim has been interpreted to mean, in lines 9-15: --wherein the external connecting pipes are connected to the secondary apertures through a plurality of quick-coupling clip-type connectors, and wherein at least one respective third aperture on the pipe is proximate to a respective secondary aperture of the plurality of secondary apertures, and at least one tab on the click-type connector is fitted into a respective third aperture of the at least one respective third aperture.--. Regarding claim 5, it is unclear what “secondary tabs” of the connectors, and what corresponding “respective indentations on the pipe” the claim is referring to. The drawings show connectors (8) comprising a single tab (20), but do not show any connector (8) comprising a secondary tab having respective indentations, let alone any pipe (2) comprising indentations that engage with any secondary tab of the connectors (8). See also the Drawing objection, above. For the purpose of this examination, the claim has been interpreted to mean: --wherein the pipe comprises secondary tabs having respective indentations configured to engage with respective indentations provided on the connectors.--. Regarding claim 14, the claim recites the limitation “said secondary tabs” in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. In line 7, it is unclear what “the apertures” the claim is referring to. For the purpose of this examination, the claim has been interpreted to mean, in lines 4 and 7, respectively: --the pipe comprises secondary tabs,--, and --wherein the at least one respective third aperture comprises a plurality of third apertures, and wherein the plurality of third apertures and the secondary tabs are provided along the edges of the flat face.--. Regarding claims 2, 7, 9-13 and 15-16, the claims are rejected by virtue of their dependency on claim 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS. — Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Specifically, claim 2 is not requiring the limitation “a plurality of quick-coupling clip-type connectors” of claim 1, since claim 2 calls for the quick-coupling connectors comprising snap-type couplings. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 5, 7 and 9-16, as best understood, would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Response to Arguments The rejection of claims 3-5, 10-12 and 14, under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), as set forth in the Office Action mailed 09/15/2025 second paragraph, are withdrawn in light of the amendments. Applicant's arguments filed 03/16/2026 have been fully considered but they do not apply to the new grounds of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GUSTAVO A HINCAPIE SERNA whose telephone number is (571)272-6018. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Len Tran can be reached at 571-272-1184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GUSTAVO A HINCAPIE SERNA/Examiner, Art Unit 3763 /JENNA M MARONEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 21, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jun 06, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Mar 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595972
HEAT PIPE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590640
FLOW REVERSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12563703
HEAT DISSIPATION FOR AN INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12550298
HEAT SINK AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME, HEAT EXCHANGER, AND GYROID STRUCTURE COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12546542
VAPOR CHAMBER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF VAPOR CHAMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+26.0%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 405 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month