Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/339,748

RECHARGEABLE BATTERY WITH RESISTIVE LAYER FOR ENHANCED SAFETY

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jun 22, 2023
Priority
Nov 25, 2014 — provisional 62/084,454 +5 more
Examiner
CHMIELECKI, SCOTT J
Art Unit
1729
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
American Lithium Energy Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
606 granted / 764 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
791
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 764 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. § 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. § 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. § 101. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of prior U.S. Patent No. 11,782,523. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. The claims in the instant application are identical to that of U.S. Patent No. 11,782,523, filed as U.S. Application No. 17/068,678, from which the instant application continues. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT J CHMIELECKI whose telephone number is (571)272-7641. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 am to 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ula Ruddock can be reached at (571) 272-1481. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCOTT J. CHMIELECKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 22, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12614776
METHOD FOR PREHEATING A SWITCHABLE BATTERY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12609416
BATTERY MODULE
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12609296
METHOD FOR REDUCING NON-UNIFORM ELECTRODE COATING DEGRADATION AND BATTERY CELLS COMPRISING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12592421
BATTERY PACK, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND VEHICLE
3y 3m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586838
BATTERY PACK
3y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.0%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 764 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month