Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/340,592

Cationic Bottlebrush Polymers for Gene Delivery

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 23, 2023
Priority
Jun 24, 2022 — provisional 63/366,985
Examiner
BOYLE, ROBERT C
Art Unit
1635
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Regents of the University of Minnesota
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
67%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
784 granted / 1127 resolved
+9.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1154
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
77.9%
+37.9% vs TC avg
§102
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1127 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-10, in the reply filed on 4/24/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 11-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 4/24/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the repeating cationic unit is 2-dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate. This is indefinite because 2-dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate is not cationic, but is a neutral monomer. It is suggested that claim 2 be amended to recite the cationic unit is derived from 2-dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 8-9, 21-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huang (CN 110627978). As the CN document is not in English, citations are made to the attached translation. Huang teaches brush polymers (¶ 10-11) where a block PCL and hydrophilic cationic block of PDMAEMA is grafted to a cellulose nanocrystal matrix (¶11) to give CNC-g-PCL-b-PDMAEMA (¶13). The CNC corresponds to the claimed backbone and the PDMAEMA corresponds to a side chain having plurality of repeating cationic units. Huang teaches dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate is a hydrophilic cationic monomer that forms the cationic block (¶ 7, 11) which meets claim 2. Huang teaches the structure PNG media_image1.png 162 240 media_image1.png Greyscale (Formula 3, ¶83). Huang teaches the degree of polymerization of n is 17, x is 5, and m is 300 (¶95). This corresponds to 5 repeating cationic units in each side chain and meets claim 3. This also corresponds to 300 side chains covalently attached to the backbone and meets claim 4. Huang does not provide any indication that a different amount of repeat units is present, and thus the chains have the same amount of repeat units present and meet claim 5. Huang teaches the molecular weight of the polymer is 13024 (¶95) which is 13.024 kDa and meets claim 8. Huang does not expressly recite the pKa of the brush polymer. However, the instant specification teaches that the DMAEMA has a pKa of 8.5 which lowers to around 6.9-7.0 when used in the bottlebrush polymer. See instant specification, pg. 14, ¶ 71, Table 2. Huang teaches using the same monomer, DMAEMA, in a brush polymer (as described above), and thus is expected to have the same pKa discussed by the instant specification, around 6.9-8.5. This meets claim 9. Huang teaches the polymeric materials are used as drug carriers for entry into cells (¶4-6, 121) by using electrostatic interactions (¶ 56). Claim(s) 1-5, 8, 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kageyama (JP 2012-241189). As the JP document is not in English, citations are made to the attached translation. Kageyama teaches a polymer having the structure PNG media_image2.png 209 684 media_image2.png Greyscale where the molecular weight of the MATMAC polymer is 12,000 (¶ 155) where MATMAC is Methacryloyloxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride DMAEMA (¶ 153) which has a molecular weight of 207.70 g/mol. This gives about 57 repeat units of DMAEMA which meets claim 3. Kageyama teaches the moles of the macromonomer, DMAEMA and styrene to form the backbone is about 0.43:0.43:0.43 (¶156) and the amount of initiator is 0.015 mol (¶ 156) which would result in about 28 repeat units of each monomer and macromonomer. This meets the range of claim 4 and would also provide a molecular weight of about 339,000 which is 339 kDa and meets claim 8. Kageyama does not provide any indication that a different amount of repeat units is present, and thus the chains have the same amount of repeat units present and meet claim 5. While Kageyama does not explicitly state the polymer is configured to associate with a biological agent for delivery into a cell, Kageyama teaches the same polymeric structure of a backbone with a plurality of side chains having a plurality of cations as the instant claims. This feature provides the polymer with a configuration to associate with a biological agent for delivery. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-7, 10, 24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 6-7 recite different number of side chain repeat units depending on where the side chains are located. Claim 10 recites a zeta potential of about 25-40 mV. Claim 24 recites the biological agent comprises DNA, RNP or mixtures thereof. Relevant prior art includes Huang (CN 110627978), Huang (CN 110627978), and Hortz, Macromolecules 2015, 48, 2074-2086 (present on the IDS of 3/15/2024). Huang teaches brush polymers (¶ 10-11) where a block PCL and hydrophilic cationic block of PDMAEMA is grafted to a cellulose nanocrystal matrix (¶11) to give CNC-g-PCL-b-PDMAEMA (¶13). The CNC corresponds to the claimed backbone and the PDMAEMA corresponds to a side chain having plurality of repeating cationic units. Huang teaches dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate is a hydrophilic cationic monomer that forms the cationic block (¶ 7, 11). Huang fails to teach the different number of side chain repeat units depending on where the side chains are located, the claimed zeta potential, or the biological agent comprises DNA, RNP or mixtures thereof. Kageyama teaches a polymer having the structure PNG media_image2.png 209 684 media_image2.png Greyscale where the molecular weight of the MATMAC polymer is 12,000 (¶ 155) where MATMAC is Methacryloyloxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride DMAEMA (¶ 153) which has a molecular weight of 207.70 g/mol. Kageyama fails to teach the different number of side chain repeat units depending on where the side chains are located, the claimed zeta potential, or the biological agent comprises DNA, RNP or mixtures thereof. Hortz teaches brush polymers having a polyaminohexylmethacrylamide backbone and polysarcosine side chains where the amino groups on the side chains are cationic (Scheme 1). Horst fails to teach a brush polymer having a repeating cationic units. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT C BOYLE whose telephone number is (571)270-7347. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 10am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arrie (Lanee) Reuther can be reached at (571)270-7026. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT C BOYLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1764
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 23, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674007
Preparation Method for Ethylene-Vinyl Alcohol Copolymer
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668647
Polyethylene Pipe Resin with High Resistance to Slow Crack Growth
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668693
POLYPROPYLENE BASED FILM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658444
NITRO-SUBSTITUTED AROMATIC COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN ELECTRODES
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649844
POLYMER COMPOSITION, MANUFACTURING METHOD OF CROSS-LINKABLE POLYMER AND CROSS-LINKABLE POLYMER
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
67%
With Interview (-2.7%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1127 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month