Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/341,214

COMPLEMENTARY MOLD FRAME FOR BLUE LIGHT LEAKAGE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 26, 2023
Examiner
APENTENG, JESSICA MCMILLAN
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Dell Products L.P.
OA Round
6 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
636 granted / 969 resolved
-2.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
68 currently pending
Career history
1037
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 969 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-7, 9-16, 18 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao et al. (US 2023/0097447 A1) in view of Qin et al. (US 2022/0413342 A1) and Kamada et al. (US 2018/0046031 A1). Regarding claim 1, Zhao et al. teaches a display device comprising: a backlight assembly with a mini light emitting diode (LED) (see paragraph [0020] where mini-LED is disclosed) that emit blue light (see paragraph [0020] where blue light is disclosed); and PNG media_image1.png 248 706 media_image1.png Greyscale a mold frame (16; figures 4A and 4B) having a yellow phosphor powder (see paragraph [0047] where plastic frame 16 may be polycarbonate material made of yellow quantum dot material. In this way, the entire plastic frame 16 can be yellow.) mixed with a material used to manufacture the mold frame (see paragraph [0047] where plastic frame 16 is made of a yellow quantum dot material.) and enclosing the backlight assembly (12, [0018] “a backlight light source”), wherein an inner portion of the mold frame (16; see figure 4A and 4B) is disposed proximate to an inner portion of the backlight assembly (12), such that a portion of the blue light emitted by the mini-LED (12, [0020] “the backlight light source 12 may be a millimeter light-emitting diode (Mini LED)”) strikes the inner portion of the mold frame (16, see Fig. 4B & Fig. 3 where light emitted from 12 may obviously strike or reach 16), and wherein an outer portion of the mold frame (16) is coupled with an inside portion (1112) of a back cover (11) of the display device. Zhao et al. teaches a mini-LED but does not explicitly teach a plurality of mini LEDs. Qin et al. (US 2022/0413342 A1) teaches a plurality of mini light emitting diodes (light emitting units 202; paragraph [0051] where mini light emitting diodes are disclosed.) It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Zhao et al. to include a plurality of mini LEDs as taught by Qin et al. as an alternative and obvious design choice to achieve a desired illumination output. Zhao et al. modified by Qin et al. does not explicitly teach wherein the mold frame is configured to affix a position of an optical film between a diffuser and a quantum dot sheet. PNG media_image2.png 545 663 media_image2.png Greyscale Kamada et al. teaches a frame (frame 16 and frame portion 161; figure 8; see paragraph [0155] where optical member 15 is supported by the frame portion 161) that is configured to affix a position of an optical film (middle optical member 15 in at least figure 8; paragraph [0160]) between a diffuser (top optical member 15 can be a diffuser; paragraph [0160]) and a quantum dot sheet (phosphor sheet 150; see figure 8 and at least paragraph [0162] where quantum dot phosphors are disclosed). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify Zhao et al. to configure the frame to affix a position of an optical film between a diffuser and a quantum dot sheet as taught by Kamada et al. in order to reduce color unevenness and achieve a desired illumination output (see paragraph [0074] of Kamada et al.). Regarding claim 3, Zhao et al. further teaches the display device wherein an entire outer surface of the mold frame (plastic frame 16; figure 4B) is coated with yellow phosphor (see paragraph [0047] where plastic frame 16 may be polycarbonate material made of yellow quantum dot material. In this way, the entire plastic frame 16 can be yellow.) Regarding claim 4, Zhao et al. further teaches the display device wherein the mold frame (plastic frame 16; figure 4B) encloses the backlight assembly (backlight light source 12; figure 4B). Regarding claim 5, Zhao et al. further teaches the display device wherein a white light (see paragraph [0046 and [0047] where white light is disclosed) is reflected through a gap between the mold frame (16; figure 4A and 4B) and the backlight assembly (12). Regarding claim 6, Zhao et al. further teaches the display device wherein the blue light (see paragraph [0047] where the backlight light source is a blue light source) strikes the mold frame (16; figure 4A and 4B) that is proximate to the backlight assembly (12; figure 4A and 4B). Regarding claim 7, Zhao et al. teaches a backlight assembly, comprising: a light plate (13; figure 4A and 4B); and a mold frame (16; figure 4A and 4B) that is proximate to the light plate (13) enclosing the backlight assembly (see figure 4A and 4B), wherein the mold frame includes a yellow phosphor powder material mixed with a material used to manufacture the mold frame (see paragraph [0047] where plastic frame 16 may be polycarbonate material made of yellow quantum dot material. In this way, the entire plastic frame 16 can be yellow.), wherein an inner portion of the mold frame (16) is proximate to an inner portion of the backlight assembly (light source 12), such that a portion of blue light emitted by a mini light emitting diode (12; see paragraph [0020] where mini-LED is disclosed) of the backlight assembly strikes the inner portion of the mold frame (16; figure 4A and 4B), and wherein an outer portion of the mold frame (16; figure 4A and 4B) is coupled with an inside portion of a back cover (11) of a display device associated with the backlight assembly (see figure 4A and 4B). Zhao et al. does not explicitly teach more than one [mini LED]. Qin et al. teaches a plurality of mini light emitting diodes (light emitting units 202; paragraph [0051] where mini light emitting diodes are disclosed.) It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Zhao et al. to include a plurality of mini LEDs as taught by Qin et al. as an alternative and obvious design choice to achieve a desired illumination output. Zhao et al. modified by Qin et al. does not explicitly teach wherein the mold frame is configured to affix a position of an optical film between a diffuser and a quantum dot sheet. PNG media_image2.png 545 663 media_image2.png Greyscale Kamada et al. teaches a frame (frame 16 and frame portion 161; figure 8; see paragraph [0155] where optical member 15 is supported by the frame portion 161) that is configured to affix a position of an optical film (middle optical member 15 in at least figure 8; paragraph [0160]) between a diffuser (top optical member 15 can be a diffuser; paragraph [0160]) and a quantum dot sheet (phosphor sheet 150; see figure 8 and at least paragraph [0162] where quantum dot phosphors are disclosed). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify Zhao et al. to configure the frame to affix a position of an optical film between a diffuser and a quantum dot sheet as taught by Kamada et al. in order to reduce color unevenness and achieve a desired illumination output (see paragraph [0074] of Kamada et al.). Regarding claim 9, Zhao et al. further teaches the backlight assembly wherein a white light (see paragraph [0046 and [0047] where white light is disclosed) is reflected from the mold frame (16; figure 4A and 4B). Regarding claim 10, Zhao et al. further teaches the backlight assembly wherein the mold frame (plastic frame 16; figure 4B) encloses the backlight assembly (backlight light source 12; figure 4B). Regarding claim 11, Zhao et al. modified by Q in et al. teaches the backlight assembly of claim 7, and Zhao et al. teaches a mini LED (12) but does not explicitly teach wherein the backlight assembly includes a plurality of mini-LEDs. Qin et al. teaches a plurality of mini light emitting diodes (light emitting units 202; paragraph [0051] where mini light emitting diodes are disclosed.) It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Zhao et al. to include a plurality of mini LEDs as taught by Qin et al. as an alternative and obvious design choice to achieve a desired illumination output. Regarding claim 12, Zhao et al. further teaches the backlight assembly wherein an outer surface area of the mold frame (16; figure 4A and 4B) with yellow phosphor (see paragraph [0047]) is disposed proximate to the backlight assembly (light source 12; figure 4A and 4B). Regarding claim 13, Zhao et al. further teaches the backlight assembly wherein a white light (see paragraph [0046 and [0047] where white light is disclosed) is reflected through a gap between the mold frame (16; figure 4A and 4B) and the backlight assembly (12). Regarding claim 14, Zhao et al. further teaches the backlight assembly wherein the blue light that struck the mold frame (16; figure 4A and 4B) was leaked from the backlight assembly (light source 12; figure 4A and 4B). Regarding claim 15, Zhao et al. teaches a display device: a backlight assembly with a micro light emitting diode (LED) that emit blue light see paragraph [0020] where mini-LED is disclosed) that emit blue light (see paragraph [0020] where blue light is disclosed); and a mold frame with yellow phosphor powder mixed with a material used to the mold frame ( see paragraph [0047] where plastic frame 16 may be polycarbonate material made of yellow quantum dot material. In this way, the entire plastic frame 16 can be yellow.) and enclosing the backlight assembly (see paragraph [0047] where plastic frame 16 is made of a yellow quantum dot material.) and enclosing the backlight assembly (light source 12; see figure 4A and 4B), wherein an inner portion of the mold frame (16; see figure 4A and 4B) is disposed proximate to an inner portion of the backlight assembly (light source 12; see at least figure 4A and 4B), such that the blue light emitted by the micro-LED (12, [0020] “the backlight light source 12 may be a millimeter light-emitting diode (Mini LED)”) strikes the inner portion of the mold frame (16; see figure 4A and 4B) and wherein an outer portion of the mold frame (16; see figure 4A and 4B) is coupled with an inside portion of a back cover (11; see figure 4A and 4B) of the display device. Zhao et al. teaches a micro-LED but does not explicitly teach a plurality of micro-LEDs. Qin et al. teaches a plurality of mini light emitting diodes (light emitting units 202; paragraph [0051] where mini light emitting diodes are disclosed.) It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Zhao et al. to include a plurality of mini LEDs as taught by Qin et al. as an alternative and obvious design choice to achieve a desired illumination output. Zhao et al. modified by Qin et al. does not explicitly teach wherein the mold frame is configured to affix a position of an optical film between a diffuser and a quantum dot sheet. PNG media_image2.png 545 663 media_image2.png Greyscale Kamada et al. teaches a frame (frame 16 and frame portion 161; figure 8; see paragraph [0155] where optical member 15 is supported by the frame portion 161) that is configured to affix a position of an optical film (middle optical member 15 in at least figure 8; paragraph [0160]) between a diffuser (top optical member 15 can be a diffuser; paragraph [0160]) and a quantum dot sheet (phosphor sheet 150; see figure 8 and at least paragraph [0162] where quantum dot phosphors are disclosed). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify Zhao et al. to configure the frame to affix a position of an optical film between a diffuser and a quantum dot sheet as taught by Kamada et al. in order to reduce color unevenness and achieve a desired illumination output (see paragraph [0074] of Kamada et al.). Regarding claim 16, Zhao et al. further teaches the display device wherein a surface of the mold frame (16) is coated with yellow phosphor (see paragraph [0047] where plastic frame 16 may be polycarbonate material made of yellow quantum dot material. In this way, the entire plastic frame 16 can be yellow.) . Regarding claim 18, Zhao et al. teaches the display device of claim 15, wherein a white light is reflected from an outer surface area of the mold frame (see paragraph [0046 and [0047] where white light is disclosed) that is coated with yellow phosphor(16; see paragraph [0047] where plastic frame 16 may be polycarbonate material made of yellow quantum dot material. In this way, the entire plastic frame 16 can be yellow.). Regarding claim 19, Zhao et al. further teaches the display device a white light (see paragraph [0046 and [0047] where white light is disclosed) is reflected through a gap between the mold frame (16; figure 4A and 4B) and the backlight assembly (12). Claim(s) 2, 8 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao et al. (US 2023/0097447 A1) in view of Qin et al. (US 2022/0413342 A1) and Kamada et al. (US 2018/0046031 A1) as applied to claims 1, 7 and 15, respectively, above and further in view of Vampola et al. (US 2015/0048395 A1), hereinafter referred to as Vampola’395. Regarding claim 2, Zhao et al. modified by Qin et al. and Kamada et al. teaches the display device of claim 1, but Zhao et al. does not explicitly teach wherein the yellow phosphor is a yttrium aluminum garnet phosphor. Vampola’395 teaches a yellow phosphor that is a yttrium aluminum garnet phosphor (see paragraph [0026] where YAG phosphor may be used in the wavelength converting material). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Zhao et al. to include yellow phosphor that is a yttrium aluminum garnet phosphor as taught by Vampola’395 as an obvious substitution to convert the emitting light to achieve desired illumination output. Regarding claim 8 Zhao et al. modified by Qin et al. and Kamada et al. teaches the display device of claim 7, but Zhao et al. does not explicitly teach wherein the yellow phosphor is a yttrium aluminum garnet phosphor. Vampola’395 teaches a yellow phosphor that is a yttrium aluminum garnet phosphor (see paragraph [0026] where YAG phosphor may be used in the wavelength converting material). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Zhao et al. to include yellow phosphor that is a yttrium aluminum garnet phosphor as taught by Vampola’395 as an obvious substitution to convert the emitting light to achieve desired illumination output. Regarding claim 17, Zhao et al. modified by Qin et al. and Kamada et al. teaches the display device of claim 15, but Zhao et al. does not explicitly teach wherein the yellow phosphor is a yttrium aluminum garnet phosphor. Vampola’395 teaches a yellow phosphor that is a yttrium aluminum garnet phosphor (see paragraph [0026] where YAG phosphor may be used in the wavelength converting material). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Zhao et al. to include yellow phosphor that is a yttrium aluminum garnet phosphor as taught by Vampola’395 as an obvious substitution to convert the emitting light to achieve desired illumination output. Claim(s) 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao et al. (US 2023/0097447 A1) in view of Qin et al. (US 2022/0413342 A1) and Kamada et al. (US 2018/0046031 A1) as applied to claim 1 above and further in view of Kishimoto et al. (US 2013/0329442 A1). Regarding claim 20, Zhao et al. modified by Qin et al. and Kamada et al. teaches the display device of claim 1, but Zhao et al. does explicitly teach wherein the [yellow phosphor powder] is mixed with an amorphous thermoplastic polymer material. Kishimoto et al. teaches a yellow phosphor powder (see paragraph [0078] where YAG:Ce fluorescent substance is disclosed) is mixed with an amorphous thermoplastic polymer material (see paragraph [0078] discloses an amorphous material). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Zhao et al. to include a yellow phosphor powder mixed with an amorphous thermoplastic polymer material as taught by Kishimoto et al. to rapidly release heat, which is generated when the fluorescent substance is excited from the YAG phosphor power to the outside and to prevent sealing material from being notably deteriorated (see paragraph [0078] of Kishimoto et al). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds of rejection necessitated by applicant’s amendment of independent claims 1, 7 and 15. New reference, Kamada et al. (US 2018/0046031 A1), teaches the limitations of the amended claim independent claims. See rejection above. Claims 2-6, 8-14 and 16-20 remain rejected based on dependency on a rejected base claim. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSICA MCMILLAN APENTENG whose telephone number is (571)272-5510. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ABDULMAJEED AZIZ can be reached at 571-270-5046. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSICA M APENTENG/Examiner, Art Unit 2875 /ABDULMAJEED AZIZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 11, 2024
Response Filed
Sep 25, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 26, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 03, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 13, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 24, 2025
Interview Requested
Mar 13, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jul 22, 2025
Interview Requested
Jul 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 20, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 06, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 29, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 30, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585155
BACKLIGHT PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584605
LAMP FOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578576
FRONT LIGHTING OF A DISPLAY FOR A WEARABLE E-READER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570206
AUTOMOBILE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557703
ILLUMINATOR, ILLUMINATOR REPAIRING DEVICE, AND ILLUMINATOR REPAIRING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+18.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 969 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month