Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/341,491

INDUCTOR COMPONENT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR INDUCTOR COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 26, 2023
Priority
Jun 27, 2022 — JP 2022-102971
Examiner
HINSON, RONALD
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
581 granted / 786 resolved
+5.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
817
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
90.0%
+50.0% vs TC avg
§102
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 786 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of group 1/species 1 (figures 1-5, claims 1-4 and 8-9) in the reply filed on 05/18/26 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 1 Claims 1-4 and 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ishima et al. (US 20210012947) in view of Kim et al. (KR 102105389)(English translation). Regarding claim 1, Ishima et al. (figures 1-4 and para 0018-0064) discloses an element body having a rectangular parallelepiped shape having six outer surfaces (figures 1-4); an inductor wiring extending inside the element body (figure 2); a first covering electrode (42) that covers a bottom surface (see figure 4), which is one of the outer surfaces (see figures 1-4), and is electrically connected to a first end of the inductor wiring (see para 0026-0030); and a second covering electrode (52) that covers the bottom surface and is electrically connected to a second end of the inductor wiring (see figure 4 and para 0026-0030), when one of the six outer surfaces of the element body perpendicular to the bottom surface is defined as a main surface (see figures 1-4), and surfaces perpendicular to both the bottom surface and the main surface are defined as a first end surface and a second end surface (see figures 1-4), the first covering electrode and the second covering electrode cover a part of a first virtual line that passes through a geometric center of the bottom surface and is perpendicular to the first end surface (see figure 1), and the first covering electrode covers the first end surface, and the second covering electrode covers the second end surface (see figures 1-4) and when a distance from the first end surface to a surface of the first covering electrode in a direction perpendicular to the first end surface is defined as a thickness of the first covering electrode (see figure 4). Ishima et al. does not expressly disclose a position where the thickness of the first covering electrode is maximum is shifted toward a main surface side with respect to a geometric center of the first end surface on a second virtual line that passes through the geometric center of the first end surface and is perpendicular to the main surface. Kim et al.(figures 4-6 and pages 3-5) discloses a teaching a position where the thickness of the first covering electrode (132) is maximum is shifted toward a main surface side with respect to a geometric center of the first end surface (see figures 4-6 showing the back portion on the drawings 4-6 is the main surface side in regards to the first covering/outer electrode 132) on a second virtual line that passes through the geometric center of the first end surface and is perpendicular to the main surface. (see figures 4-6) Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the applicant claimed invention to design wherein a position where the thickness of the first covering electrode is maximum is shifted toward a main surface side with respect to a geometric center of the first end surface on a second virtual line that passes through the geometric center of the first end surface and is perpendicular to the main surface as taught by Kim et al. to the inductive device of Ishima et al. so as to reduce parasitic coupling, optimize heat dissipation, and control magnetic flux leakage without increasing the component footprint. Regarding claim 2, Kim et al. (figures 4-6 and pages 3-5) discloses wherein when a dimension of the first covering electrode in a direction perpendicular to the bottom surface on the first end surface is defined as a height of the first covering electrode, a position where the height of the first covering electrode is maximum is shifted toward the main surface side with respect to the geometric center of the first end surface. Regarding claim 3, Kim et al. (figures 4-6 and pages 3-5) discloses wherein the inductor wiring includes a plurality of wiring portions arranged in a direction perpendicular to the main surface and a via connecting the wiring portions adjacent to each other in the direction perpendicular to the main surface, and when, among the plurality of wiring portions, the wiring portion extending parallel to the main surface from the first end is defined as a first end wiring portion, the thickness of the first covering electrode on the second virtual line is maximum in a range where the first end wiring portion exists in the direction perpendicular to the main surface. Regarding claim 4, Ishima et al. (figure 4 and para 0034-0040) discloses wherein the element body includes a first buried electrode (41) connected to the first end of the inductor wiring and in direct contact with the first covering electrode (42), and the first buried electrode includes an end surface electrode portion that is exposed to an outside of the element body at the first end surface and is covered with the first covering electrode.(see figure 4). Regarding claim 8, Kim et al. (figures 4-6 and pages 3-5) discloses wherein the thickness of the first covering electrode is 0 on the geometric center of the first end surface. Regarding claim 9, Kim et al. (figures 4-6 and pages 3-5) discloses wherein the inductor wiring includes a plurality of wiring portions arranged in a direction perpendicular to the main surface and a via connecting the wiring portions adjacent to each other in the direction perpendicular to the main surface, and when, among the plurality of wiring portions, the wiring portion extending parallel to the main surface from the first end is defined as a first end wiring portion, the thickness of the first covering electrode on the second virtual line is maximum in a range where the first end wiring portion exists in the direction perpendicular to the main surface. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RONALD HINSON whose telephone number is (571)270-7915. The examiner can normally be reached M to F; 8 -5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RONALD HINSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683069
COIL DEVICE
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683066
COIL COMPONENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676261
COIL COMPONENT
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665125
COIL, PLANAR COIL AND METHOD FOR MAKING COIL
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658356
COIL DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.3%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 786 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month