Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/343,137

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR UNZIPPING POLYMERS FOR ENHANCED ENERGY RELEASE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jun 28, 2023
Examiner
FELTON, AILEEN BAKER
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 6m
To Grant
67%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allow Rate
223 granted / 435 resolved
-13.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
486
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 435 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of invention II in the reply is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 1-9 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/8/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 10-13 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by (6143101). Regarding claims 10-13, Lundstrom discloses heat applied through ignition (col. 2, lines 5-10) to a composition that includes aluminum, nanosized iron oxide (claim 11) (meets claimed nanothermite), and propylene carbonate (see table). The propylene carbonate polymer unzips due to the heat application which meets the limitation of heat near the reaction front since the composition is heated by ignition. Regarding claim 13, the step of sequential monomer depolymerization is met through the heating step as shown by Applicant’s specification para 0018. Regarding clam 16, the composition is used as a propellant. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 10, 12, 14, 15, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tappan (8048242) in view of Lundstrom (6143101). Regarding claim 10, Tappan discloses nanothermite including copper oxide and aluminum (claim 1 and col1, lines 20-25) with a binder as applied by ink for energetic applications that are exposed to heat by ignition (col.1 lines 60-67 and col. 2, lines 1-20). Lundstrom teaches that propylene carbonate is a known binder for use with nanothermite compositions (see table). The propylene carbonate polymer unzips due to the heat application which meets the limitation of heat near the reaction front since the composition is heated by ignition. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made and/or filed to use the binder as taught by Lundstrom with the ink nanothermite of Tappan since Tappan discloses that it is known to use a binder with nanothermite ink compositions and since Lundstrom teaches that propylene carbonate is a known binder for use with nanothermite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 10 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the reaction front”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 16 recites the limitation "the energetic composite”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AILEEN BAKER FELTON whose telephone number is (571)272-6875. The examiner can normally be reached Monday 9-5:30, Thursday 11-3, Friday 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AILEEN B FELTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600688
SENSITIZING COMPOSITION FOR ENERGETIC HYDROGEN PEROXIDE EMULSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595217
THERMITE BLOCK FOR STORED-DATA DESTRUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595174
METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE PENTAZOLATE ANION USING A HYPERVALENT IODINE OXIDANT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12559443
ENERGY-RELEASING COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552729
MECHANICALLY-GASSED EMULSION EXPLOSIVES AND METHODS RELATED THERETO
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
67%
With Interview (+15.5%)
4y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 435 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month