Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/343,169

TWO-STAGE SELF-ORGANIZING OPTIMIZED AGGREGATION METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTED RESOURCES OF VIRTUAL POWER PLANT (VPP)

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 28, 2023
Examiner
PATEL, JIGNESHKUMAR C
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Changsha University Of Science And Technology
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
346 granted / 439 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
467
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 439 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Application 2. Claim 1, 3, 8, 13-16 have been amended and claim 6-7 and 9-12 have been canceled. Claim 1-5, 8, and 13-16 are in pending status. Response to Arguments 3. The specification objection in regard to the title have been withdrawn in light of new title filed on 11/24/25. The claim 6-7 and 9-12 have been canceled, hence the prior 35 U.S.C 112(a), and 35 U.S.C 112(b) rejection have been withdrawn. 35 U.S.C101 rejection for claim 8, and 13-16 have been withdrawn in light of amendment to the claim filed on 11/24/25. 4. The 35 U.S.C 112(b) rejection for claim 1 is maintained as the amended claim language is not clear and still indefinite. Claim Objections 5. Claim 2-4 and 13-15 are objected to because of the following informalities: The claimed equations in respected claim proving difficult to read due to its scanning or resolution issues. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 7. Regarding claim 1, the phrase “operating the wind power, the photovoltaic power and the load, the distributed gas turbines” and “decomposing the optimum powers to obtain first reference powers of the wind power, the photovoltaic power” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). The limitations are indefinite because how one can operate wind power and photovoltaic power? Also how to obtain reference powers of the wind power and photovoltaic power? Based on this the claim is considered to indefinite and rejected under 35 U.S.C 112(b). 8. Claim 2-5, 8, and 13-16 are also rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) to their direct/indirect dependency over the claim 1. Examiner’s Note: Examiner believes it should be claimed as “the wind power stations, the photovoltaic power stations” in both limitation. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIGNESHKUMAR C PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-0698. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth M. Lo can be reached at (571)272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIGNESHKUMAR C PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 24, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603503
Information Processing System and Information Processing Method For Matching A Power-Feeding Vehicle And A Selected Area Selected By A User Of The Power-Feeding Vehicle From A Plurality Of Off-Grid Area
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596337
ELECTRONIC DEVICE TO CONTROL AN APPLICATION BASED ON PREDICTED USE OF THE APPLICATION AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583071
TOOL MEASURING SYSTEM, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585264
WORK MACHINE AND WORK MACHINE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TRANSMITTING INFORMATION ACCORDING TO PRIORITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12566411
CONTROL ASSISTANCE DEVICE, CONTROL SYSTEM, AND FILTER ADJUSTMENT METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 439 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month