Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/343,740

BATTERY MODULE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Examiner
FANG, MICHAEL
Art Unit
1784
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Prime Planet Energy & Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-65.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
3 currently pending
Career history
3
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§102
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2025/0079616 (Walter et al., hereinafter, “Walter”). Regarding claims 1, Walter is directed to a battery module consisting of a plurality of battery cells arranged in a first direction (multiplicity of prismatic battery cells combined in succession, with main face to main face (¶ 0018, 0048)), with each of the plurality of battery cells including a housing having a gas-discharge valve and an electrode terminal provided on the housing (each battery cell has a safety valve between the electrical contacts (¶ 0049)). The battery module has a cover member that includes a first region and a second region, the first region is located above at least one of the electrode terminals, and the second region is located above at least one of the gas-discharge valves (an outer module cover lies on the side of the module with the electrical contacts (on top of the battery cells) and has a region with rupture cut-outs positioned above the safety valves, with each safety valve associated with a corresponding rupture cut-out (¶ 0049 - 0050). Each rupture cut-out is closed with a rupture disc that is sufficiently thin that it opens when acted upon by the temperature and pressure of hot gas (¶ 0023, 0060 - 0062)). Regarding claim 2, the second region extends in the direction of the battery cells because the battery cells are stacked main face to main face (¶ 0018, 0048), lining up the safety valves, and the rupture cut-outs are positioned above the safety valves, with each rupture cut-out corresponds to a safety valve (¶ 0049 - 0050). Regarding claim 3, 5, and 7, the second region has rupture cut-outs, and each rupture cut-out is closed with a rupture disc that is sufficiently thin that it opens when acted upon by the temperature and pressure of hot gas (¶ 0023, 0060 - 0062)). This rupture disc is both thin and a lid, and easily breaks before the rest of the outer module cover, thus having a lower strength. Regarding claim 4, the features in claim 4 are outlined in claims 2 and 3 above. Regarding claim 6, the features in claim 6 are outlined in claims 2 and claim 5 above. Regarding claim 8, the features in claim 8 are outlined in claims 2 and claim 7 above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL FANG whose telephone number is (571)272-8815. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 7:30am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Humera Sheikh can be reached at (571)272-0604. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.F./ Examiner, Art Unit 1784 /HUMERA N. SHEIKH/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month