Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/344,126

SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE OF CELL ARRAY

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Priority
Aug 01, 2022 — provisional 63/369,981
Examiner
HARRISON, MONICA D
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
888 granted / 967 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
994
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
40.4%
+0.4% vs TC avg
§102
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 967 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lin et al (10,867,101 B1) . Regarding claim 1, Lin et al discloses a semiconductor structure (Figures 1A, 1B, 7C and 7D), comprising: a logic cell (Figures 7C and 7D), comprising: a first transistor (Figure 1B, reference 150) comprising a first gate structure (Figure 1B, reference 127) extending in a first direction and overlapping a first semiconductor fin (Figure 1B, reference 116); and a second transistor (Figure 1B, reference 123), comprising a second gate structure (Figure 1B, reference 124) extending in the first direction and overlapping the first semiconductor fin (Figure 1B, reference 116) and a second semiconductor fin (Figure 1B, reference 120), wherein the first and second semiconductor fins (Figure 1B, references 116 and 120) extend in a second direction that is perpendicular to the first direction, wherein the first and second transistors (Figure 1B, references 123c and 150) share a source/drain region (Figure 1B, reference 114b), and one end of the first gate structure (Figure 1B, reference 150) is formed between the first and second semiconductor fins (Figure 1B, references 116 and 120). Regarding claim 2, Lin et al discloses wherein the first and second transistors (Figure 1B, references 123c and 127) have the same conductivity type (column 5, lines 24-41). Regarding claim 3, Lin et al discloses wherein the first and second semiconductor fins have the same length in the logic cell (Figure 1B, references 116 and 120). Regarding claim 4, Lin et al discloses wherein the logic cell further comprises: a third transistor, comprising the second gate structure extending in the first direction and overlapping a third semiconductor fin, wherein the third semiconductor fin is parallel to the first and second semiconductor fins, and the second and third transistors have different conductivity types (Figures 7C and 7D). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-20 are allowed over the prior of record. Reasons for Allowance The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art does not disclose nor fairly suggest a semiconductor structure, comprising: N-type transistors of the first logic cells disposed in the first row of the cell array share a plurality of second continuous fins, wherein the number of the first continuous fins is different from the number of the second continuous fins in the first row of the cell array (claim 5) and a semiconductor structure, comprising: N-type transistors of the logic cells disposed in the first row of the cell array share a plurality of second semiconductor fins extending in the first direction, wherein a first logic cell in the first row of the cell array comprises a first P-type transistor and a first N-type transistor, wherein the number of the first semiconductor fins overlapping a first gate structure of the first P-type transistor is different from the number of the second semiconductor fins overlapping a second gate structure of the first N-type transistor, wherein the first and second gate structures extend in a second direction that is perpendicular to the first direction, and the first and second gate structures are aligned in the second direction (claim 13) as described in the independent claims and in the context of its recited apparatuses, along with their depending claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Liaw (12,159,872 B2) discloses an IC including a first P-type FinFET and a second P-type FinFET and first source/drain regions of the first P-type FinFET are formed on a discontinuous semiconductor fin, and second source/drain regions of the second P-type FinFET are formed on a continuous semiconductor fin. However, Liaw does not disclose the allowable claimed subject matter as stated above. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA D HARRISON whose telephone number is (571)272-1959. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Benitez can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MONICA D HARRISON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815 mdh April 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
May 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 04, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 19, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772514
GATE-ALL-AROUND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURES HAVING DEPOPULATED CHANNEL STRUCTURES USING MULTIPLE BOTTOM-UP OXIDATION APPROACHES
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772503
THIN FILM TRANSISTOR AND DISPLAY APPARATUS COMPRISING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765339
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757430
LOW-RESISTANCE AND THERMALLY STABLE CONTACTS WITH BORIDE, INDIUM, OR GALLIUM METAL COMPOUND LAYERS
4y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757545
DISPLAY DEVICE AND PRODUCTION METHOD FOR DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+2.7%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 967 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month