Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/344,396

METHOD AND COMPOSITION FOR LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Priority
Jun 29, 2022 — provisional 63/356,920
Examiner
FIORITO, JAMES A
Art Unit
1731
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Molten Salt Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
508 granted / 718 resolved
+5.8% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
755
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
82.7%
+42.7% vs TC avg
§102
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 718 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I, Species 1 (Chloroform) and Species A (organophosphate comprises liquid phosphine oxide) in the reply filed on 2/18/2026 and in an Interview with the examiner on 4/13/2026. The claims to be examined are 1, 5, 10, and 13-17. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, 10, and 15-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN 108854537. Regarding claim 1 and 10, CN ‘537 teaches a liquid-liquid extraction of lithium (Abstract). The process includes an extraction composition that includes an organic phase (Claim 1). The extraction composition may further include a co-extractant phosphine oxide, which is an organophosphate (Contents of Intention). Regarding claim 5, the organic solvent may be chloroform (Contents of Invention). Regarding claim 15-17, the extraction composition may include a metal lithium salt such as lithium sulfate (Example 1) and ammonia (Claim 10). Claim(s) 1, 5, 10, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN 88101566. Regarding claim 1 and 10, CN ‘566 teaches a liquid-liquid extraction of rare earth metals (Abstract, Claim 1, Claim 23). The process includes an extraction composition that includes an organic phase (Claim 1). The extraction composition may further include a co-extractant phosphine oxide, which is an organophosphate (Claim 7). Regarding claim 5, the organic solvent may be chloroform (Description). Regarding claim 13, the organic phase may include high carbon alcohols with 4-15 carbon atoms (Description). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 88101566. Regarding claim 14, CN ‘566 does not expressly recite 1-pentanol as the alcohol used in the organic phase. However, CN ‘566 teaches the organic phase may include high carbon alcohols with 4-15 carbon atoms (Description). The person having ordinary skill in the art would have understood that 1-pentanol is one of the species of alcohol within the range of alcohols from 4-15 carbon atoms that would provide predictable results because pentanol is has 5 carbon atoms and is the simplest form of an alcohol having a linear carbon chain and the alcohol attached to the end of the chain. Thus, it would have been obvious to the person having ordinary skill in the art to choose 1-pentanol in process of CN ‘566 with predictable results. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES A FIORITO whose telephone number is (571)272-9921. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES A FIORITO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 20, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 13, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12623909
MOLECULAR SIEVE SSZ-121 WITH HIGH ACIDITY, ITS SYNTHESIS AND USE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616963
CHROME-FREE COPPER CATALYSTS FOR FATTY ESTER HYDROGENOLYSIS/HYDROGENATION
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612344
CATALYSTS AND METHODS FOR NATURAL GAS PROCESSES
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12606447
MESOPOROUS SILICA MANUFACTURED IN THE PRESENCE OF WATER-SOLUBLE ODSO
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12600626
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OZONE DEGRADATION FOR A PLASMA TREATMENT SYSTEM
4y 9m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.1%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 718 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month